![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From this morning's AVweb:
"Cessna is one of as many as three suitors for Columbia Aircraft, which has been shopped around by the Malaysian government, its principal investors, for about a year. Analysts say acquiring Columbia would give Cessna instant penetration of the luxury touring market that it has all but surrendered to Cirrus and the current incarnation of Columbia...Cessna's interest could be an indication that its high-wing Next Generation Piston project has failed to strike a chord with dealers and potential owners and it has decided to enter the low-wing sweepstakes." Wonder how Columbia owners would feel about being converted to Cessna owners. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote:
From this morning's AVweb: "Cessna is one of as many as three suitors for Columbia Aircraft, which has been shopped around by the Malaysian government, its principal investors, for about a year. Analysts say acquiring Columbia would give Cessna instant penetration of the luxury touring market that it has all but surrendered to Cirrus and the current incarnation of Columbia...Cessna's interest could be an indication that its high-wing Next Generation Piston project has failed to strike a chord with dealers and potential owners and it has decided to enter the low-wing sweepstakes." Wonder how Columbia owners would feel about being converted to Cessna owners. Interesting prospect - I wonder if Lancair would be part of the deal too? I'm sure Cessna would love to have their name on the 330kt Evolution turboprop as they have nothing like it in their lineup. If not, I don't think there's any reason why they couldn't continue to sell the planes still labeled as Columbias. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-09-24 04:22:24 -0700, "Dan Luke" said:
Wonder how Columbia owners would feel about being converted to Cessna owners. Cessna probably has the resources to provide better support. Cessna's only problem has been a lack of planes. Another production facility and a new lineup would make the dealers happy. In return, Cessna's dealer and service network would probably make Columbia owners happy. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote: Cessna's dealer and service network would probably make Columbia owners happy. Since buying an in-warranty Cessna, I've found the factory phone support helpful and easy to access; they even return phone calls. The Cessna Service Center system is less agreeable. My nearest CSC is a shop 50 miles away in Pensacola, and they are not Cessna experts by their own admission. Up until last year, they were a Piper dealer. Fortunately, I don't have to depend on them for avionics warranty work, since there is a Garmin & Bendix/King dealer at BFM. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... From this morning's AVweb: "Cessna is one of as many as three suitors for Columbia Aircraft, which has been shopped around by the Malaysian government, its principal investors, for about a year. Analysts say acquiring Columbia would give Cessna instant penetration of the luxury touring market that it has all but surrendered to Cirrus and the current incarnation of Columbia...Cessna's interest could be an indication that its high-wing Next Generation Piston project has failed to strike a chord with dealers and potential owners and it has decided to enter the low-wing sweepstakes." Wonder how Columbia owners would feel about being converted to Cessna owners. About the same as BMW/Mercedes owners would have felt if the Chrysler-Daimler deal had been reversed. Columbia's aircraft have the quality of workmanship that BMW and Mercedes have long had. It would be nice to have more service centers, but I'd be afraid the bean counters would have the upper hand. IOW, the Cessna centers would also take in Columbias, but whether that would be a "good thing" is questionable. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:22:24 -0500, Dan Luke wrote:
"Cessna is one of as many as three suitors for Columbia Aircraft, Wikipedia (for what it's worth) writes that Cessna closed the deal. Two days later, it was confirmed that Columbia was going to be sold to Cessna.[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Aircraft -- Dallas |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dallas wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:22:24 -0500, Dan Luke wrote: "Cessna is one of as many as three suitors for Columbia Aircraft, Wikipedia (for what it's worth) writes that Cessna closed the deal. Two days later, it was confirmed that Columbia was going to be sold to Cessna.[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Aircraft For a little better cite. http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#196211 The Columbia news release says the sale to Cessna is contingent on the bankruptcy court's approval and a final agreement with Cessna. According to the news release, Cessna has signed a letter of intent to buy certain assets and assume some of Columbia's debt. Carl Young said that the deal ensures that existing owners and position holders will be looked after. "The sale of Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing assets to Cessna offers the best avenue to maximize value for all of Columbia’s stakeholders and existing and future customers. Cessna is excited about the prospect of adding the Columbia products to its product line and will provide additional capabilities, world-class processes and financial strength to effectively serve existing Columbia customers and grow the business. Under the agreement reached with Cessna all product warranty and service issues will continue to be honored post-acquisition and customers should expect an enhanced customer experience once the deal closes," Young said. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wonder how Columbia owners would feel about being converted to Cessna owners. -- Dan T-182T at BFM Although being supported by Cessna maybe removes some of the exclusive cachet of being a Columbia owner, for me it would be a major gain to have an aircraft supported by a company with resources. Columbia has been under-capitalized, and even if I had the $500K at hand I would likely not have bought one simply because of the concern about parts availability down the road since the company appeared not to have staying power. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-09-24 04:22:24 -0700, "Dan Luke" said:
From this morning's AVweb: "Cessna is one of as many as three suitors for Columbia Aircraft, which has been shopped around by the Malaysian government, its principal investors, for about a year. Analysts say acquiring Columbia would give Cessna instant penetration of the luxury touring market that it has all but surrendered to Cirrus and the current incarnation of Columbia...Cessna's interest could be an indication that its high-wing Next Generation Piston project has failed to strike a chord with dealers and potential owners and it has decided to enter the low-wing sweepstakes." Wonder how Columbia owners would feel about being converted to Cessna owners. I suppose the worst thing that could happen would be that Cessna would decide that selling 50 copies of a $700,000 airplane a year is not worth it, shut down the production line, and use the facility for a distribution center and manufacturing plant for the Cessna NG. The fact is, the Mustang has hogged all the production capability of the Independence plant, leaving Cessna completely unable to meet the demand for piston singles. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought Columbia was in trouble when they stopped production and treid to
blame Garmin. "C J Campbell" wrote in message news:2007092707415916807-christophercampbell@hotmailcom... On 2007-09-24 04:22:24 -0700, "Dan Luke" said: From this morning's AVweb: "Cessna is one of as many as three suitors for Columbia Aircraft, which has been shopped around by the Malaysian government, its principal investors, for about a year. Analysts say acquiring Columbia would give Cessna instant penetration of the luxury touring market that it has all but surrendered to Cirrus and the current incarnation of Columbia...Cessna's interest could be an indication that its high-wing Next Generation Piston project has failed to strike a chord with dealers and potential owners and it has decided to enter the low-wing sweepstakes." Wonder how Columbia owners would feel about being converted to Cessna owners. I suppose the worst thing that could happen would be that Cessna would decide that selling 50 copies of a $700,000 airplane a year is not worth it, shut down the production line, and use the facility for a distribution center and manufacturing plant for the Cessna NG. The fact is, the Mustang has hogged all the production capability of the Independence plant, leaving Cessna completely unable to meet the demand for piston singles. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's on your OSH shopping list? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 12 | July 18th 07 09:06 AM |
Plane shopping | Greg Copeland | Owning | 19 | July 31st 06 05:59 PM |
Shopping for intercom | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 9 | April 22nd 05 04:05 AM |
shopping | [email protected] | Simulators | 0 | December 8th 04 07:30 AM |
columbia anyone disciplined? | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 2 | September 15th 03 03:58 AM |