![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AD 2008-06-51 prohibits injected (mostly Lycoming) aircraft owners
from changing their own oil (really makes the plane unairworthy after an oil change until you get an A&P sign off). Talking to AOPA about this I really don't get the impression that they think this is very important. I would encourage everyone to send a quick email to AOPA and let them know that the FAA needs to find another way to do this AD other than restricting oil changes. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Huh? The way I read that AD, it has nothing to do with oil changes. The
repetitive inspection portion of it will be a PITA, which states : At every engine oil change or within every 50 hours of engine run time, whichever occurs first, repeat the inspection and remedial steps specified in paragraphs (f) through (h)(9) of this AD. It in no way makes oil changes by the owner prohibited. If you have other info, please post it. Jim "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ... AD 2008-06-51 prohibits injected (mostly Lycoming) aircraft owners from changing their own oil (really makes the plane unairworthy after an oil change until you get an A&P sign off). Talking to AOPA about this I really don't get the impression that they think this is very important. I would encourage everyone to send a quick email to AOPA and let them know that the FAA needs to find another way to do this AD other than restricting oil changes. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a side note, if you obtain a new updated gasket for the servo plug, your
A&P can install it and eliminated the repetitive portion of that AD. Jim "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ... AD 2008-06-51 prohibits injected (mostly Lycoming) aircraft owners from changing their own oil (really makes the plane unairworthy after an oil change until you get an A&P sign off). Talking to AOPA about this I really don't get the impression that they think this is very important. I would encourage everyone to send a quick email to AOPA and let them know that the FAA needs to find another way to do this AD other than restricting oil changes. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 12:18*pm, "Jim Burns" wrote:
Huh? *The way I read that AD, it has nothing to do with oil changes. *The repetitive inspection portion of it will be a PITA, which states : At every engine oil change or within every 50 hours of engine run time, whichever occurs first, repeat the inspection and remedial steps specified in paragraphs (f) through (h)(9) of this AD. It in no way makes oil changes by the owner prohibited. *If you have other info, please post it. The AD says "At every oil change...". There for when you go out to your plane to change the oil you can no longer fly it and must wait to schedule an A&P to sign the AD. Draining the oil makes the plane unairworthy. -Robert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 12:34*pm, "Jim Burns" wrote:
As a side note, if you obtain a new updated gasket for the servo plug, your A&P can install it and eliminated the repetitive portion of that AD. Jim Legally, the A&P can do it. However, there are two issues with this... 1) The fuel shops say retorquing the nut requires a new flow test. The torque on the nut affects flows. They recommend never allowing an A&P to touch the servo. 2) The safety wire used on the nut has "tamper evident" attachment. If the A&P cuts the wire there is no warranty on the servo. On the Mooney its a major buger of a job to R&R the servo. -Robert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:04:55 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: AD 2008-06-51 prohibits injected (mostly Lycoming) aircraft owners from changing their own oil (really makes the plane unairworthy after an oil change until you get an A&P sign off). Talking to AOPA about this I really don't get the impression that they think this is very important. I would encourage everyone to send a quick email to AOPA and let them know that the FAA needs to find another way to do this AD other than restricting oil changes. The only thing that AD does is require an inspection of a fuel servo plug for security. It takes 10 minutes (most of which is getting at the thing, which if you've already gotten it open for the oil change makes it take 5 seconds) and if you can't get the nearest mechanic to sign an entry saying that they complied with the job then you're not doing something right. It doesn't stop you from changing your oil in any way, shape, or form. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there a new version of the AD? I don't see anything in there under
alternative methods of compliance showing a method other than the inspection to comply. On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:34:14 -0600, "Jim Burns" wrote: As a side note, if you obtain a new updated gasket for the servo plug, your A&P can install it and eliminated the repetitive portion of that AD. Jim "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ... AD 2008-06-51 prohibits injected (mostly Lycoming) aircraft owners from changing their own oil (really makes the plane unairworthy after an oil change until you get an A&P sign off). Talking to AOPA about this I really don't get the impression that they think this is very important. I would encourage everyone to send a quick email to AOPA and let them know that the FAA needs to find another way to do this AD other than restricting oil changes. -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.precisionairmotive.com/Pu...107%20Rev2.pdf
Gives warranty info, including a $100 offer to have the work performed. Precision's website has a warranty claim form. No mention of a flow test being required or recommended, but I don't doubt that your fuel shop would recommend it, certainly can't hurt. The plug serves as a cover to the internal mixture adjustment mechanism of the servo, however, the gasket under the plug also seals the plug hole which is on the "air" side of the servo. If the plug does not seal, it can suck air and the mixture will be leaner than desired, however, it seems Precision feels that an A&P is more than qualified to replace the gasket. Jim "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ... On Apr 1, 12:34 pm, "Jim Burns" wrote: As a side note, if you obtain a new updated gasket for the servo plug, your A&P can install it and eliminated the repetitive portion of that AD. Jim Legally, the A&P can do it. However, there are two issues with this... 1) The fuel shops say retorquing the nut requires a new flow test. The torque on the nut affects flows. They recommend never allowing an A&P to touch the servo. 2) The safety wire used on the nut has "tamper evident" attachment. If the A&P cuts the wire there is no warranty on the servo. On the Mooney its a major buger of a job to R&R the servo. -Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 2:21*pm, Peter Clark
wrote: *It takes 10 minutes (most of which is getting at the thing, which if you've already gotten it open for the oil change makes it take 5 seconds) and if you can't get the nearest mechanic to sign an entry saying that they complied with the job then you're not doing something right. *It doesn't stop you from changing your oil in any way, shape, or form. A couple things you probably have not considered... 1) Before this AD I could change my oil on the weekend or earily AM before work (which is when I usually do it), now you have to coordinate the time when the shop is open (take the AM off work) 2) No A&P is going to bill you for 5 minutes. You'll be billed at least 30 minutes, meaning you might as well have the A&P change the oil. The benefit of changing your own oil is gone. If you don't see the above points as a lose in ability/freedom then I can't help you. If the AD had something to do with oil I would be ok with it but it doesn't. Making the aircraft unairworthy because the pilot changed the oil doesn't in anyway make the AD any more effective. -Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The AD is specific to a specific part numbered gasket. The Precision SB
indicates a new gasket that, if installed, eliminates this AD. Jim "Peter Clark" wrote in message ... Is there a new version of the AD? I don't see anything in there under alternative methods of compliance showing a method other than the inspection to comply. On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:34:14 -0600, "Jim Burns" wrote: As a side note, if you obtain a new updated gasket for the servo plug, your A&P can install it and eliminated the repetitive portion of that AD. Jim "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ... AD 2008-06-51 prohibits injected (mostly Lycoming) aircraft owners from changing their own oil (really makes the plane unairworthy after an oil change until you get an A&P sign off). Talking to AOPA about this I really don't get the impression that they think this is very important. I would encourage everyone to send a quick email to AOPA and let them know that the FAA needs to find another way to do this AD other than restricting oil changes. -Robert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A week ago I became a new co-owner | bdl | Owning | 16 | April 9th 05 12:37 AM |
172RG are any injected or are all carburated? | Daniel L. Lieberman | Piloting | 2 | September 30th 04 02:06 AM |
Corporation or LLC as Owner? | robin | Owning | 1 | March 26th 04 01:05 AM |
Fuel-Injected Continental O-200 | Calvin R. Walker | Home Built | 1 | November 22nd 03 02:50 PM |
Hot Starting Fuel Injected Engines | Peter Duniho | Piloting | 23 | October 18th 03 02:50 AM |