![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WIth 4 hours on the fresh top overhaul I decided it was time to
balance the prop as we removed the weights when sending the props out for new studs... I was delayed a bit at my monthly meeting down in Grand Blanc and got back to the airport at a quarter to one... The Kid was chomping at the bit... He immediately dove into pulling the top cowel and the top plate of the air pressure box around the engine... He bolted the accelerometer to the engine, taped the strobe to the side of the lower cowl, and cleaned the back of the prop with butyrate thinner and put reflective tape on it... (I love the smell of bannana oil - it always makes me remember my dad as one of my earliest memories is following him around a yellow J3 Cub as he was patching the fabric) We pushed back out onto the ramp and did the engine run... It was 24 IPS at 2400 RPM - not good... The engine definitely was putting vibration into the airframe... Even more noticeable with the cowel off when you can see the cylinders vibrating... He then pulled a spinner screw and hung an external weight on the spinner in the amount that the balancer machine calculated and we re- ran the engine... Oops, we were 180 degrees off on placement (Murphy hanging around)... Quickly reversed that and ran it again... Balance was about 0.9 IPS - mucho better... OK, now we are in the ball park... The Kid changed over to internal weights.. He had to calculate the new weight based on the fact that they were closer to the crank centerline than when external, and plus the additional weight that the computer called for the 0.9IPS of unbalance... After mounting the internal weight we put the spinner back on, and did all the safety wire and screws, etc... Took it out and ran it... About 0.7 IPS, acceptable but nothing to write home about... We pulled back in and discussed it... Decided to go to split weights... Took the spinner off again, which is not a trivial job recalculated the weights for the split condition, rehung them, put it all back together (it is 33 degrees and blowing and even with the plane part way in the shop, I am by now shivering)... Pushed back, engine run. 0.6 IPS @ 2400, but we both can tell it is smoother with the split weights at idle than it was with a single weight... Asked the computer for the new (and hopefully final) weight... Once more into the breach we, the light Brigade, go...Take it apart, add one thin little weight, put it together, push it back, run it... Holy shakes, Batman - 0.2 IPS! HIgh fives all around... Two hours of freezing our butts off and wearing the tips off our fingers with lebenty seben screws... ME: Uhh, why is there a film of oil on the back side of the accessory case?" The Kid: "Well, I was hoping you wouldn't notice that." ME: "In your dreams, Tonto." We are both peering at the offending specks of oil (just a dusting really) Looks like the gasket for the oil filter adapter... The Kid sighs, "Well, lets push it in the shop and I'll change the gasket tomorrow. I've got another job I promised to do today." Ah jeez, I wanted to go flying... Does that Murphy guy ever take a day off? denny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny" wrote in message ... WIth 4 hours on the fresh top overhaul I decided it was time to balance the prop as we removed the weights when sending the props out for new studs... You should probably plan on doing this again in about 25 hours. With only four hours on a top your cylinder pressures are nowhere near even; you should expect some vibration. -- *H. Allen Smith* WACO - We are all here, because we are not all there. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 6:21 am, "Allen" wrote:
You should probably plan on doing this again in about 25 hours. With only four hours on a top your cylinder pressures are nowhere near even; you should expect some vibration. But that causes vibration torsionally, which the accelerometer ignores. The accelerometer reads vertical movement of the engine, normally as close as possible behind the prop. Uneven firings will cause the engine to rotate around the crankshaft, with no vertical component. Dan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 6:21*am, Denny wrote:
WIth 4 hours on the fresh top overhaul I decided it was time to balance the prop as we removed the weights when sending the props out for new studs... I was delayed a bit at my monthly meeting down in Grand Blanc and got back to the airport at a quarter to one... The Kid was chomping at the bit... He immediately dove into pulling the top cowel and the top plate of the air pressure box around the engine... *He bolted the accelerometer to the engine, taped the strobe to the side of the lower cowl, and cleaned the back of the prop with butyrate thinner and put reflective tape on it... (I love the smell of bannana oil - it always makes me remember my dad as one of my earliest memories is following him around a yellow J3 Cub as he was patching the fabric) We pushed back out onto the ramp and did the engine run... It was 24 IPS at 2400 RPM - not good... The engine definitely was putting vibration into the airframe... Even more noticeable with the cowel off when you can see the cylinders vibrating... He then pulled a spinner screw and hung an external weight on the spinner in the amount that the balancer machine calculated and we re- ran the engine... Oops, we were 180 degrees off on placement (Murphy hanging around)... Quickly reversed that and ran it again... Balance was about 0.9 IPS - mucho better... OK, now we are in the ball park... The Kid changed over to internal weights.. He had to calculate the new weight based on the fact that they were closer to the crank centerline than when external, and plus the additional weight that the computer called for the 0.9IPS of unbalance... *After mounting the internal weight we put the spinner back on, and did all the safety wire and screws, etc... Took it out and ran it... About 0.7 IPS, acceptable but nothing to write home about... We pulled back in and discussed it... *Decided to go to split weights... Took the spinner off again, which is not a trivial job recalculated the weights for the split condition, rehung them, put it all back together (it is 33 degrees and blowing and even with the plane part way in the shop, I am by now shivering)... *Pushed back, engine run. 0.6 IPS @ 2400, but we both can tell it is smoother with the split weights at idle than it was with a single weight... Asked the computer for the new (and hopefully final) weight... Once more into the breach we, the light Brigade, go...Take it apart, add one thin little weight, put it together, *push it back, run it... Holy shakes, Batman - 0.2 IPS! HIgh fives all around... Two hours of freezing our butts off and wearing the tips off our fingers with lebenty seben screws... ME: *Uhh, why is there a film of oil on the back side of the accessory case?" The Kid: *"Well, I was hoping you wouldn't notice that." ME: "In your dreams, Tonto." We are both peering at the offending specks of oil (just a dusting really) Looks like the gasket for the oil filter adapter... The Kid sighs, "Well, lets push it in the shop and I'll change the gasket tomorrow. I've got another job I promised to do today." Ah jeez, I wanted to go flying... Does that Murphy guy ever take a day off? denny If you are running a ACES balancer it has been my experience if there is any more then a light breeze while running it up it will not settle down and give a perfect reading. Those units are great and very sensitive. I usually don't stop till I get into the .0 something range.As you found out to dial it in perfectly you have to split weight it. Hope the oil leak is a simple fix and hopefully that Murphy guy is gone for good... tailwinds ben |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 6:32 am, Peter wrote:
What suprises me is how few people know about this process. It makes a very noticeable difference to vibration and probably shows through the avionics living longer. Gyros, too. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny" wrote: Does that Murphy guy ever take a day off? Hah! Getting close to an airplane with a wrench is like handing a stripper a credit card. -- Dan T-182T at 4R4 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 8:32 am, Peter wrote:
What also suprises me is how bad brand new props can be, despite having been statically balanced *supposedly* very accurately. In my life I've purchased two brand new McCauley fixed pitch props. Both were substantially out-of-balance as they came out of the box, and both were fixed by a local prop shop. I am amazed the prop shop (Maxwell) could do better given their comparatively crude tools. Must just be skill & attention to detail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
*Must
just be skill & attention to detail. Exactly... Look at the fine cabinetry for the nobility made in the 1700-1800's.... No rulers, no micrometers, no lasers, no power tools, only crude hand tools and skill... denny |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny wrote:
Must just be skill & attention to detail. Exactly... Look at the fine cabinetry for the nobility made in the 1700-1800's.... No rulers, no micrometers, no lasers, no power tools, only crude hand tools and skill... Waaaaait a minute! G I'm a serious woodworker, and the guys who made stuff for nobility back then most certainly did have good tools! 1.) Wooden hand planes, some with metal mechanisms, go back to the Greeks and Romans, as does metallurgy for making cutting tools. There were many fine tool examples made in the 17 and 1800's. Basic tools, like squares, go back thousands of years, and are easily made by the user and calibrated to themselves. 2.) They had rulers back then, but they weren't made by Starrett or Brown & Sharpe. G A ruler is simply an arbitrary measuring device. If you use the same measuring tool to make an item, the tool doesn't need to be accurate to a specific standard. Furniture fits people, items made for specific people (the King), were made to that person's preferences. Parts like doors and drawers are made slightly oversize and hand fitted to specific openings. This is still done today, with fine, very high-quality work. Specific measurements are not important until interchangeability of parts (factory production) becomes a requirement. Much furniture and cabinetry is built with a measuring device called a "story stick". A modern example of a simple story stick are the red 16" and black 19.2" stud spacing markers printed on measuring tapes for framing buildings. 3.) You don't need micrometers for woodworking. They get used for setting up precision machinery, not for measuring the wood. 4.) Water powered machines were available at that time for such tasks as heavy sawing. 5.) Low cost apprentices, and sometimes slaves, were plentiful. Who needs machines when you have 100 helpers? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 17, 6:52*pm, nrp wrote:
On Mar 15, 8:32 am, Peter wrote: What also suprises me is how bad brand new props can be, despite having been statically balanced *supposedly* very accurately. In my life I've purchased two brand new McCauley fixed pitch props. Both were substantially out-of-balance as they came out of the box, and both were fixed by a local prop shop. *I am amazed the prop shop (Maxwell) could do better given their comparatively crude tools. *Must just be skill & attention to detail. This flys in the face of the "FAA certified parts are perfect" theory. One would think after spending several thousand dollars on a piece of forged aluminum that might cost 200 bucks in raw materials that the remaining costs are for the manufacturer to deliver a high quality product. The fact that a local prop shop with crud tools can balance it better then the manufatcturer is laughable......... JMHO.. Ben |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 10:18 PM |
Wierd vibration -- Prop or engine, balance or not??? | Chuck | Owning | 17 | December 1st 04 02:12 PM |
Dynamic prop balance | Ben Jackson | Owning | 18 | June 27th 04 01:45 AM |
dang that Murphy | Mike Z. | Owning | 4 | March 4th 04 02:35 PM |
Hydraulic CS prop converting to Adjustable prop? | Scott VanderVeen | Home Built | 0 | December 5th 03 05:54 PM |