![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, now this is really old information, but as a kid I recall reading
somewhere that the F-16 set a record for single-engine production fighters, with a top speed of Mach 2.32, and that this was (at the time I heard) still a record for single engine production fighters. Is this true, or did it set a record when it first flew that was passed later? I know that an F-16's top speed is lower, but.... Also, I have seen websites saying the -106 was phased out in 1988, but I seem to recall the order being given around then, but the process taking a while, with Atlantic City, NJ featuring them flying/on the ramp up until the Desert Storm timeframe or soon thereafter.... What I wouldn't give for some of the books I read as a kid. The library in town was full of books on the USAF written in the early 1960s. Truly a step into a different perspective on things. Seeing the old school planes and pressure suits, as well as the cheerful prose. (Especially the sections on survival training, with USAF pilots cheerfully cooking alligators caught in the Everglades.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, now this is really old information, but as a kid I recall reading
somewhere that the F-16 set a record for single-engine production fighters, with a top speed of Mach 2.32, and that this was (at the time I heard) still a record for single engine production fighters. Is this true, or did it set a record when it first flew that was passed later? I know that an F-16's top speed is lower, but.... I think F-104, 105, 106 would all be faster than an F-16... I seriously doubt an F-16 ever having a speed record, it just was not designed with top speed in mind. Boyds Fighter Mafia realized fighters rarely ever need to go that fast, but energy maneuvering was important though. Ron Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron" wrote in message
... OK, now this is really old information, but as a kid I recall reading somewhere that the F-16 set a record for single-engine production fighters, with a top speed of Mach 2.32, and that this was (at the time I heard) still a record for single engine production fighters. Is this true, or did it set a record when it first flew that was passed later? I know that an F-16's top speed is lower, but.... I think F-104, 105, 106 would all be faster than an F-16... I seriously doubt an F-16 ever having a speed record, it just was not designed with top speed in mind. Boyds Fighter Mafia realized fighters rarely ever need to go that fast, but energy maneuvering was important though. Ron Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4) Thank you, sir. I mistyped, though - I believe the 106 had the 2.32 Mach speed. F-16 I think is around 1.8 Mach. I read somewhere that the 106's speed was the top one for a production single engine fighter. Sounds pretty good, regardless. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David E. Powell" wrote in message s.com... "Ron" wrote in message ... OK, now this is really old information, but as a kid I recall reading somewhere that the F-16 set a record for single-engine production fighters, with a top speed of Mach 2.32, and that this was (at the time I heard) still a record for single engine production fighters. Is this true, or did it set a record when it first flew that was passed later? I know that an F-16's top speed is lower, but.... I think F-104, 105, 106 would all be faster than an F-16... I seriously doubt an F-16 ever having a speed record, it just was not designed with top speed in mind. Boyds Fighter Mafia realized fighters rarely ever need to go that fast, but energy maneuvering was important though. Ron Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4) Thank you, sir. I mistyped, though - I believe the 106 had the 2.32 Mach speed. F-16 I think is around 1.8 Mach. I read somewhere that the 106's speed was the top one for a production single engine fighter. Sounds pretty good, regardless. 2.3 is what our ANG unit claimed for the F-106. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() From the list of official FAI Air Speed Records: 16 May 1958 Lockheed YF-104A 1404.01 MPH 31 Oct. 1959 Mikoyan E-66 1483.83 MPH 15 Dec. 1959 Convair F-106A 1525.94 MPH 22 Nov. 1961 Mc Donnell F4H-1F 1606.50 MPH Go to http://www.speedrecordclub.com/records/outair.htm for a complete history. Jack "David E. Powell" wrote in message s.com... OK, now this is really old information, but as a kid I recall reading somewhere that the F-16 set a record for single-engine production fighters, with a top speed of Mach 2.32, and that this was (at the time I heard) still a record for single engine production fighters. Is this true, or did it set a record when it first flew that was passed later? I know that an F-16's top speed is lower, but.... Also, I have seen websites saying the -106 was phased out in 1988, but I seem to recall the order being given around then, but the process taking a while, with Atlantic City, NJ featuring them flying/on the ramp up until the Desert Storm timeframe or soon thereafter.... What I wouldn't give for some of the books I read as a kid. The library in town was full of books on the USAF written in the early 1960s. Truly a step into a different perspective on things. Seeing the old school planes and pressure suits, as well as the cheerful prose. (Especially the sections on survival training, with USAF pilots cheerfully cooking alligators caught in the Everglades.) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the Soviets beat the Phantom record with the one-off E-166 (looked
like a fat Mig-21 with a monster motor). Of course, Vought and the Navy never tried it with the F-8U3 which was accelerating rapidly through 2.39 when the canopy started to overheat. R / John "Jack G" wrote in message ... From the list of official FAI Air Speed Records: 16 May 1958 Lockheed YF-104A 1404.01 MPH 31 Oct. 1959 Mikoyan E-66 1483.83 MPH 15 Dec. 1959 Convair F-106A 1525.94 MPH 22 Nov. 1961 Mc Donnell F4H-1F 1606.50 MPH Go to http://www.speedrecordclub.com/records/outair.htm for a complete history. Jack "David E. Powell" wrote in message s.com... OK, now this is really old information, but as a kid I recall reading somewhere that the F-16 set a record for single-engine production fighters, with a top speed of Mach 2.32, and that this was (at the time I heard) still a record for single engine production fighters. Is this true, or did it set a record when it first flew that was passed later? I know that an F-16's top speed is lower, but.... Also, I have seen websites saying the -106 was phased out in 1988, but I seem to recall the order being given around then, but the process taking a while, with Atlantic City, NJ featuring them flying/on the ramp up until the Desert Storm timeframe or soon thereafter.... What I wouldn't give for some of the books I read as a kid. The library in town was full of books on the USAF written in the early 1960s. Truly a step into a different perspective on things. Seeing the old school planes and pressure suits, as well as the cheerful prose. (Especially the sections on survival training, with USAF pilots cheerfully cooking alligators caught in the Everglades.) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 06:55:57 -0600, "John Carrier"
wrote: I think the Soviets beat the Phantom record with the one-off E-166 (looked like a fat Mig-21 with a monster motor). Of course, Vought and the Navy never tried it with the F-8U3 which was accelerating rapidly through 2.39 when the canopy started to overheat. R / John If you have access to "Soviet X-Planes" they have an article on the E-166. ISTR it used the same engine as the Mig-25. Sukhoi also built an E-166 look-alike and both supposedly reached M2.85. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can go here for the story on the speed record:
http://www.f-106deltadart.com/index1.htm It should be noted that the aircraft that set the record was pre-PUP, pre-Pacer Mower, and had the heavy canopy installed. It was identical to those in squadron service and had nothing special done to it to improve its speed (in fact, it was the spare and wasn't even intended to go for the record). This was a production aircraft, not a one-off hybrid or prototype of an MDS never produced. The Six later earned the nickname "Last of the Sports Models". Vygg David E. Powell wrote: OK, now this is really old information, but as a kid I recall reading somewhere that the F-16 set a record for single-engine production fighters, with a top speed of Mach 2.32, and that this was (at the time I heard) still a record for single engine production fighters. Is this true, or did it set a record when it first flew that was passed later? I know that an F-16's top speed is lower, but.... Also, I have seen websites saying the -106 was phased out in 1988, but I seem to recall the order being given around then, but the process taking a while, with Atlantic City, NJ featuring them flying/on the ramp up until the Desert Storm timeframe or soon thereafter.... What I wouldn't give for some of the books I read as a kid. The library in town was full of books on the USAF written in the early 1960s. Truly a step into a different perspective on things. Seeing the old school planes and pressure suits, as well as the cheerful prose. (Especially the sections on survival training, with USAF pilots cheerfully cooking alligators caught in the Everglades.) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That F106 was on display at the USAFA - the heat exposure am=nnealed
the aluminum structure so it no longer possessed design strength and had to be grounded. I also heard the engine's RPM was cranked up way over tech order limits - interesting because a 1% increase on a dual spool engine can be a 5% increase in thrust. Supposedly went from 93% up to 97%. I also had a long phone conversation with an old squadron mate. He mentioned he used to FCF F111s - and had one out to 2.7 in a shallow dive from 50 grand. And I believe him - know him well. Don't bother telling me it's past the red line; that's just a mark on a gauge. Walt BJ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WaltBJ" wrote in message om... That F106 was on display at the USAFA - the heat exposure am=nnealed the aluminum structure so it no longer possessed design strength and had to be grounded. I also heard the engine's RPM was cranked up way over tech order limits - interesting because a 1% increase on a dual spool engine can be a 5% increase in thrust. Supposedly went from 93% up to 97%. That would be a real nice gold plate motor to be running 100% thrust at 93%. I also had a long phone conversation with an old squadron mate. He mentioned he used to FCF F111s - and had one out to 2.7 in a shallow dive from 50 grand. And I believe him - know him well. Don't bother telling me it's past the red line; that's just a mark on a gauge. It was believd around our F-106 squadron that the airframe was aerodynamicly limited to 2.3. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
Edwards air show B-1 speed record attempt | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 146 | November 3rd 03 05:18 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |