![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Posted on Sun, Mar. 14, 2004 San Jose Mercury News Many veterans reject Bush LONG DEPLOYMENTS, BENEFIT CUTS ERODE SUPPORT FOR PRESIDENT By William Douglas Knight Ridder WASHINGTON - When the Bush campaign asked James McKinnon to co-chair its veterans steering committee in New Hampshire -- a job he held in 2000 -- the 56-year-old Vietnam veteran respectfully, but firmly, said no. ``I basically told them I was disappointed in his support of veterans,'' said McKinnon, who served two tours in Vietnam with the Coast Guard. ``He's killing the active-duty military. . . . Look at the reserves call-ups for Iraq, the hardships. The National Guard -- the state militia -- is being used improperly. I took the president at his word on Iraq, and now you can't find a single report to back up or substantiate weapons of mass destruction.'' President Bush is seeking re-election as a ``war president'' whose decisive leadership steered the military to victories in Afghanistan and Iraq. But as guerrilla warfare drags on in both countries, casualties mount and the Army is stretched ever thinner, many voters in or affiliated with the military are no longer saluting the commander in chief. The failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or evidence that Saddam Hussein was in league with Al-Qaida, lengthy deployments of active-duty soldiers and reservists, and proposed cuts in veterans' benefits and perks to military families are threatening to erode Bush's once-strong support among military voters. In the 2000 presidential election, absentee military ballots from overseas helped deliver the narrow margin of victory that sent Bush into the White House. So even a small defection of current and retired military people and their dependents could spell trouble for Bush in 2004. A bipartisan ``Battleground'' poll of likely voters conducted in September found that Bush's approval rating among relatives of military personnel was only 36 percent. Military Families Speak Out, an anti-war group of relatives of deployed troops, plans to observe the Iraq war's first anniversary this week with processions outside Dover Air Force Base in Delaware and at Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington, D.C. ``I voted for Bush in 2000, and I'm not going to vote for him again,'' said Jean Prewitt, a group member from Birmingham, Ala. Her 24-year-old son, Kelley, was in the Army's 3rd Infantry Division when he was killed April 6 south of Baghdad. ``I just feel deceived. He just kept screaming, screaming, weapons of mass destruction, weapons of mass destruction, we've got to get in there. We got in there and now there aren't any.'' Bush campaign officials say they expect military voters to return to the fold because the president has delivered on his 2000 campaign promise that ``help is on the way'' for underfunded, underpaid armed forces. In his 2005 budget, Bush proposed pay increases for armed service members, and the Pentagon has upgraded about 10 percent of its military housing. http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/8184139.htm http://www.nowarforisrael.com http://www.nogw.com/warforisrael.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|