1998 TED lecture by Paul MacCready

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/p...vs_humans.html

On Oct 23, 8:51*am, Pat Russell wrote:
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/p...ture_vs_humans...

Wow.

Thanks for pointing it out.
Larry

Another great issue going in the mail this coming week.

€ Jochen Ewald flies and reports on the LS10

€ First ever * a production chart on sailplane manufacturers for 2005,
2006, 2007

€ An in-depth report on the Australian phenomenal cloud - ³the Morning
Glory²

€ Details on the new high performance trainer that sells for Eur64,000.00

€ The test pilot¹s report on the Sparrowhawk that broke up in mid-air

€ A Canadian¹s view on the Lusse World Championships

€ We provide details on a new soaring site.

€ Ritz de Luy, the European gliding journalist, joins the staff of Gliding
International

€ The report on the sailplane manufacturer that claims another has used his
fuselage design.

€ An interview with Michel Sommer, twice open class world champion.

€ A review of all the evidence relating to the finding of Steve Fossett¹s
Decathlon.


JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR

New subscribers: www.glidinginternational.com/

On 24 Oct, 04:39, wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:51*am, Pat Russell wrote:

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/p...ture_vs_humans...

Wow.

Thanks for pointing it out.
Larry

Me too.

Thanks for that - very interesting.

I found the site tricky to navigate so these may assist -

MacCready main page on TED
http://www.ted.com/index.php/speaker...maccready.html
Two lectures.

All speakers -
http://www.ted.com/index.php/speakers/browse/page/14

MacCready's company - well ex obviously.
http://www.avinc.com/

I can recall following the Gossamer xxx exploits in the
news. It was widely covered in the media in the UK and
the aircraft itself was housed in the Science Museum in
London for many years. I recall that, at the time, it was stated
that a key reason for the success in the original 1 mile over
a figure of eight course prize winning effort was that the
aircraft was designed to be easy to repair.

Previous (mostly British if I recall correctly) efforts
focussed on raw aircraft performance at the expense
of all else and when - inevitably - it crashed in an early
flight there was a years delay in the program while the
aircraft was rebuilt. Of of course a longer delay
wound result if (as it usually had) the money had run out.

MacCready built crashing into the project plan.

I wonder if Richard Noble will do the same thing with
this project?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10...d_car_project/
(maybe not

Sorry a brief "thanks" has turned into a bit of ramble.