![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004May4.html
The report is expected to conclude that the current tanker fleet needs to be modernized and that it would be too expensive to simply put new engines in the 40-year-old airframes, according to sources familiar with the report. But it also says that the Pentagon does not need to decide how to pursue that modernization immediately, the sources said The Pentagon could consider several options, including performing an analysis of alternatives, buying used planes from airlines and turning them into tankers or using a private leasing service to augment the current capacity, according to the sources familiar with the report. -HJC Boeing, Boeing, Gone. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Or buying Airbuses... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:59:26 +0200, Nemo l'Ancien
wrote: Or buying Airbuses... Now what makes me think thats a tad unlikely!, The airbus's are at a huge disadvantage, in Fuel load, Range limit, and Size, they are barely adequate..... At least thats what the request for tenders looked like after Boeing wrote/rewrote it for the USAF, the USAF seem to want a smaller fuel load, over a shorter distance, and don't really want to muck about with all that cargo stuff either, and are quite happy to pay top dollar for that exact sort of capability. Viola!!! Boeing wins... cheers John Cook Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them. Email Address :- Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Cook" wrote in message
... On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:59:26 +0200, Nemo l'Ancien wrote: Or buying Airbuses... Now what makes me think thats a tad unlikely!, The airbus's are at a huge disadvantage, in Fuel load, Range limit, and Size, they are barely adequate..... At least thats what the request for tenders looked like after Boeing wrote/rewrote it for the USAF, the USAF seem to want a smaller fuel load, over a shorter distance, and don't really want to muck about with all that cargo stuff either, and are quite happy to pay top dollar for that exact sort of capability. Viola!!! Viola??? Boeing wins... Airbus wins in Australia. -- The Raven http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3 ** President of the ozemail.* and uunet.* NG's ** since August 15th 2000. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't think so... We shall see |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Or, like you say in English "Wait and see" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Boeing B-767 Tanker case "Virtual Kryptonite" | BJ | Military Aviation | 1 | December 20th 03 05:15 AM |
BAE & Boeing sign £400,000,000 deal | Mycroft | Military Aviation | 9 | November 16th 03 06:41 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
Boeing Set For Huge Profits From Tanker Deal | ZZBunker | Military Aviation | 2 | July 4th 03 03:18 AM |