WAAS GPS vario?

Is anyone working on or studying using WAAS GPS data to make a stand-
alone vario? How would TE be implemented in such a device? Ground
speed change during a pullup? TAS based on circling winds?

Do the current PDA software programs (mSeeYou, Winpilot, etc.) when
used in GPS-only mode provide accurate vario data when hooked up to a
WAAS GPS?

Just curious - seems a 5 hz WAAS GPS could be the basis for a really
nice vario that wouldn't need any pitot-static imputs. I use mSeeYou
and a Themi, non-WAAS, and the "vario" data seems close, but I use it
more for trend and average than instantaneous data.

Winter can't end soon enough!

Kirk
66

On Jan 13, 8:23*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
Is anyone working on or studying using WAAS GPS data to make a stand-
alone vario? *How would TE be implemented in such a device? Ground
speed change during a pullup? *TAS based on circling winds?

Do the current PDA software programs (mSeeYou, Winpilot, etc.) when
used in GPS-only mode provide accurate vario data when hooked up to a
WAAS GPS?

Just curious - seems a 5 hz WAAS GPS could be the basis for a really
nice vario that wouldn't need any pitot-static imputs. *I use mSeeYou
and a Themi, non-WAAS, and the "vario" data seems close, but I use it
more for trend and average than instantaneous data.

Winter can't end soon enough!

Kirk
66

Yes but how does it tell the difference between an increase in wind
and a pull up? How will it handle STF calculations in a strong
headwind/wave where it may be really confused what is going on?

Darryl

On Jan 13, 8:36*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Jan 13, 8:23*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:



Is anyone working on or studying using WAAS GPS data to make a stand-
alone vario? *How would TE be implemented in such a device? Ground
speed change during a pullup? *TAS based on circling winds?

Do the current PDA software programs (mSeeYou, Winpilot, etc.) when
used in GPS-only mode provide accurate vario data when hooked up to a
WAAS GPS?

Just curious - seems a 5 hz WAAS GPS could be the basis for a really
nice vario that wouldn't need any pitot-static imputs. *I use mSeeYou
and a Themi, non-WAAS, and the "vario" data seems close, but I use it
more for trend and average than instantaneous data.

Winter can't end soon enough!

Kirk
66

Yes but how does it tell the difference between an increase in wind
and a pull up? How will it handle STF calculations in a strong
headwind/wave where it may be really confused what is going on?

Darryl

Darryl's right (again).

I don't think there's really a satisfactory way to take wind out of
the equation. You could try to do it with track and drift trends, but
that's not very precise given how much the wind can vary with
altitude, position and over time.

9B

Hi,

Interesting thought.

To answer your 2nd question below, I have flow with SeeYou Mobile with a
WAAS GPS only (CF GPS) and I found the thermal assistant to be pretty much
useless. However, it worked great when connected to a 302.

Good Soaring,

Paul Remde
Cumulus Soaring, Inc.
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com

"kirk.stant" wrote in message
...
Is anyone working on or studying using WAAS GPS data to make a stand-
alone vario? How would TE be implemented in such a device? Ground
speed change during a pullup? TAS based on circling winds?

Do the current PDA software programs (mSeeYou, Winpilot, etc.) when
used in GPS-only mode provide accurate vario data when hooked up to a
WAAS GPS?

Just curious - seems a 5 hz WAAS GPS could be the basis for a really
nice vario that wouldn't need any pitot-static imputs. I use mSeeYou
and a Themi, non-WAAS, and the "vario" data seems close, but I use it
more for trend and average than instantaneous data.

Winter can't end soon enough!

Kirk
66

On Jan 13, 11:03*am, wrote:
On Jan 13, 8:36*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:





On Jan 13, 8:23*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:

Is anyone working on or studying using WAAS GPS data to make a stand-
alone vario? *How would TE be implemented in such a device? Ground
speed change during a pullup? *TAS based on circling winds?

Do the current PDA software programs (mSeeYou, Winpilot, etc.) when
used in GPS-only mode provide accurate vario data when hooked up to a
WAAS GPS?

Just curious - seems a 5 hz WAAS GPS could be the basis for a really
nice vario that wouldn't need any pitot-static imputs. *I use mSeeYou
and a Themi, non-WAAS, and the "vario" data seems close, but I use it
more for trend and average than instantaneous data.

Winter can't end soon enough!

Kirk
66

Yes but how does it tell the difference between an increase in wind
and a pull up? How will it handle STF calculations in a strong
headwind/wave where it may be really confused what is going on?

Darryl

Darryl's right (again).

I don't think there's really a satisfactory way to take wind out of
the equation. You could try to do it with track and drift trends, but
that's not very precise given how much the wind can vary with
altitude, position and over time.

9B- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Cmon, let's think out of the box!

An INS/IMU can measure winds without air data. How accurate (read
"expensive") would an inertial sensor need to be to provide useful
wind data (or just TAS vs GS)?

Or bite the bullet and T into the pitot/static system and provide the
data to the GPS vario - no worse than a TE connection for a
conventional vario.

Question is whether it would be cheaper and/or better than current
mechanical or electronic TE varios? Better or worse at altitude,
faster/slower response, etc?

I'm thinking: One little box with an LCD display. TE vario, audio,
horizontal lift distribution in the current thermal in real time (for
centering), current average, past averages/acheived climbs (trend for
MC settings), logger, GPS output for other devices. Run off ship
power and have a backup rechargeable battery.

Stick in a 68mm hole, hook up pitot/static and power, off you go.
Replaces your backup mechanical or electric, gives you a real backup
when your TE probe falls off! Do it for less than $500 (yeah, right,
I know...) and you stick it in every glider out there (think of all
the crap instruments in club/commercial gliders in the US).

And please don't say "Cambridge 302" - TE probes are soooo 20th
century!

Kirk
66

Kirk - it's about time you came back home to Arizona. We don't need
no stinking varios here!

Mike

On Jan 13, 10:05*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
On Jan 13, 11:03*am, wrote:



On Jan 13, 8:36*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:

On Jan 13, 8:23*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:

Is anyone working on or studying using WAAS GPS data to make a stand-
alone vario? *How would TE be implemented in such a device? Ground
speed change during a pullup? *TAS based on circling winds?

Do the current PDA software programs (mSeeYou, Winpilot, etc.) when
used in GPS-only mode provide accurate vario data when hooked up to a
WAAS GPS?

Just curious - seems a 5 hz WAAS GPS could be the basis for a really
nice vario that wouldn't need any pitot-static imputs. *I use mSeeYou
and a Themi, non-WAAS, and the "vario" data seems close, but I use it
more for trend and average than instantaneous data.

Winter can't end soon enough!

Kirk
66

Yes but how does it tell the difference between an increase in wind
and a pull up? How will it handle STF calculations in a strong
headwind/wave where it may be really confused what is going on?

Darryl

Darryl's right (again).

I don't think there's really a satisfactory way to take wind out of
the equation. You could try to do it with track and drift trends, but
that's not very precise given how much the wind can vary with
altitude, position and over time.

9B- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Cmon, let's think out of the box!

An INS/IMU can measure winds without air data. *How accurate (read
"expensive") would an inertial sensor need to be to provide useful
wind data (or just TAS vs GS)?

Or bite the bullet and T into the pitot/static system and provide the
data to the GPS vario - no worse than a TE connection for a
conventional vario.

Question is whether it would be cheaper and/or better than current
mechanical or electronic TE varios? *Better or worse at altitude,
faster/slower response, etc?

I'm thinking: *One little box with an LCD display. *TE vario, audio,
horizontal lift distribution in the current thermal in real time (for
centering), current average, past averages/acheived climbs (trend for
MC settings), logger, GPS output for other devices. *Run off ship
power and have a backup rechargeable battery.

Stick in a 68mm hole, hook up pitot/static and power, off you go.
Replaces your backup mechanical or electric, gives you a real backup
when your TE probe falls off! *Do it for less than $500 (yeah, right,
I know...) and you stick it in every glider out there (think of all
the crap instruments in club/commercial gliders in the US).

And please don't say "Cambridge 302" - TE probes are soooo 20th
century!

Kirk
66

I am not aware of any IMS/IMU that attempt to calculate wind without
air data input. Do you know of one? It is likely a significant
challenge for rate based systems (vs. position based with GPS). e.g.
"taking a turn" cannot help determine wind with an INS. All the poor
thing can try to do is integrate external accelerations on the
aircraft caused by changes in wind.

While trying to integrate up rate based sensors to determine wind is
likely impractical. Using rate based sensors to filter other rate base
inputs likely makes more sense. I believe accelerometer based
assistance is already used to help improve/filter gusts and other
effects on variometers (wether using TE probe or digitally adjusted TAS
+pitot). I believe the Cambridge 302 uses it's accelerometers for
this, but also have heard rumors that this was never really fully
developed in the software. I am not sure if other vario/computer
systems also do this. I certainly like how the vario in the 302
performs (and I'm using electronic TE compensation with mine).

Paul gives on example of the SeeYou Mobile thermal assistant not
working well with just GPS+WAAS input. In the past other people have
tried to use STF data through PDA software. Finally Naviter had to
warn pilots this can't possibly work, they just don't have enough data
to calculate something useful.

Even if all the above were not show-stopping issues you'd have to look
at the noise spectrum of the altitude signal around a fraction to 1 Hz
to see how bad differentiating (for vertical velocity) and filtering
this is going to be. I just don't have that data handy. And you may
need a sophisticated antenna system to provide a good GPS satellite
sky view when turning tightly. A TE probe, which is just a couple of
holes or a slot cut in a few dollars worth of tube seems a lot easier
way to get basic data. As Dick Johnson kept reminding us, you don't
need a fancy tail mount TE probe a simple home made fuselage mounted
one works great. An electronic pressure sensor to incorporate into a
vario costs a few dollars. The software to make all this work really
well. Priceless. I can't wait to see what Dave Ellis does at
ClearNav...


Darryl

On Jan 13, 12:38*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
I believe the Cambridge 302 uses it's accelerometers for
this, but also have heard rumors that this was never really fully
developed in the software.

More than a rumor I think. My recollection is that it was
experimented with but never implemented in any way. You can read the
accerolemeter values on one of the data pages though.

Andy

On Jan 13, 12:25*pm, Andy wrote:
On Jan 13, 12:38*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:

I believe the Cambridge 302 uses it's accelerometers for
this, but also have heard rumors that this was never really fully
developed in the software.

More than a rumor I think. *My recollection is that it was
experimented with but never implemented in any way. *You can read the
accerolemeter values on one of the data pages though.

Andy

It would be interesting to know what they did and if there is anything
used for gust filtering etc.

The accelerometer (or one axis of it) is used for the slow flight
warning, as can be demonstrated by playing around with the glider near
the low-speed threshold.

Darryl

Darryl,

INS would be like a GPS that had accurate heading info - would still
need TAS to solve the wind triangle, just like on an E6B.

I didn't think it all the way through, obviously!

The trouble with TE probes is that they are fragile have several
failure points. So it's nice to have a backup system (electronic TE
on a 302, for example).

My experience with a non WAAS Themi, which also drives my mSeeYou, is
that the "vario" data, once established in a thermal, is pretty good -
since I'm looking for differences around the circle, not absolute
climb values. And having the GPS show where in the thermal the
stronger lift was located is useful. But it is not a replacement for
a good TE vario.

I'm just curious if the increased accuracy of WAAS can be merged into
an instrument that will present a clearer 3-D picture of a thermal.
The best current vario only tells you how well you were climbing a few
seconds ago, but not where. PDA software is pretty good at showing
historical flight path, but I think there is room for improvement on
how to display a thermal in 3D that is useful for a pilot trying to
dig out of a hole or max out a boomer.

I'm going to have to run some simultaneous traces from a conventional
logger (pressure altitude) and my PDA logger (GPS altitude) and
compare the thermal data in SeeYou.

Fun to what-if...!

Kirk