![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"WASHINGTON, June 22 — Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, a prime
architect of the Bush administration's Iraq policy, said Tuesday that the Pentagon had underestimated the violent tenacity of an insurgency that formed after Baghdad fell, and he acknowledged that the United States may be forced to keep a significant number of troops in Iraq for years to come." -- Today's NY Times That's all very nice, but let's recall that two four star generals (at least) Generals Zinni and Hoar -- both former commanders of Central Command -- have said Iraq was contained, and no invasion was necessary. And let's remember that the Chief of Staff of the Army, General Shinseki said 300K troops were required to settle the security situation. Let's remember that the Bush administration went into Iraq with less than half that number after ensuring the only possible source of significant numbers of other troops -- the UN -- was thoroughly alienated. The Bush adminstration is a miserable failure and the blood of our troops is red on its hands. Walt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WalterM140 wrote:
"WASHINGTON, June 22 - Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, a prime architect of the Bush administration's Iraq policy, said Tuesday that the Pentagon had underestimated the violent tenacity of an insurgency that formed after Baghdad fell, and he acknowledged that the United States may be forced to keep a significant number of troops in Iraq for years to come." -- Today's NY Times That's all very nice, but let's recall that two four star generals (at least) Generals Zinni and Hoar -- both former commanders of Central Command -- have said Iraq was contained, and no invasion was necessary. And let's remember that the Chief of Staff of the Army, General Shinseki said 300K troops were required to settle the security situation. Let's remember that the Bush administration went into Iraq with less than half that number after ensuring the only possible source of significant numbers of other troops -- the UN -- was thoroughly alienated. The Bush adminstration is a miserable failure and the blood of our troops is red on its hands. Walt "But, Daddy, if I fire them, I might embarrass them and make them feel bad!" Is that a boss man with balls, or what??? Yeah, I know.....it sure as hell isn't the first choice, is it. George Z. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... WalterM140 wrote: "WASHINGTON, June 22 - Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, a prime architect of the Bush administration's Iraq policy, said Tuesday that the Pentagon had underestimated the violent tenacity of an insurgency that formed after Baghdad fell, and he acknowledged that the United States may be forced to keep a significant number of troops in Iraq for years to come." -- Today's NY Times That's all very nice, but let's recall that two four star generals (at least) Generals Zinni and Hoar -- both former commanders of Central Command -- have said Iraq was contained, and no invasion was necessary. And let's remember that the Chief of Staff of the Army, General Shinseki said 300K troops were required to settle the security situation. And Shinseki's numbers have proven to be high; you might note that Shinseki himself waffled after his first statement, dropping the number to 200K (still too high)... Let's remember that the Bush administration went into Iraq with less than half that number after ensuring the only possible source of significant numbers of other troops -- the UN -- was thoroughly alienated. The Bush adminstration is a miserable failure and the blood of our troops is red on its hands. Walt "But, Daddy, if I fire them, I might embarrass them and make them feel bad!" Is that a boss man with balls, or what??? Yeah, I know.....it sure as hell isn't the first choice, is it. Tsk, tsk, tsk! And this coming from a yutz who just recently decried the pursuit of off-topic trolls in the NG--shame on you, Georgie (or is it Hal? You get me so confused...one minute you actually have the balls to use your own name, then you revert to using your none-too-witty nom du guerre...). Brooks George Z. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Presidents What Has Been Shot At | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 80 | February 20th 04 02:02 AM |
US to restart nuke testing ...congress signs bill... | MeganJ | Military Aviation | 4 | December 3rd 03 12:18 PM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |
Congress promotes Billy Mitchell to Major General | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 15 | October 14th 03 05:37 AM |
MEDIA ADVISORY ON 767A REPORT TO CONGRESS | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 11th 03 09:30 PM |