![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been looking at the LS-6 gliders lately and noticed that on the
LS-6C the rudder looks almost twice as big at the root chord than on the LS-6A. Is this an optical illusion, or is it real? I am guessing that since the later version of the LS-6 had tip extensions, the rudder was resized to allow for that. Would love to hear from any LS-6 drivers of the "smaller" rudder versions how the bird handles, especially regarding rudder inputs. Regards, Brad |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 10, 7:17*am, Brad wrote:
I've been looking at the LS-6 gliders lately and noticed that on the LS-6C the rudder looks almost twice as big at the root chord than on the LS-6A. Is this an optical illusion, or is it real? I am guessing that since the later version of the LS-6 had tip extensions, the rudder was resized to allow for that. Would love to hear from any LS-6 drivers of the "smaller" rudder versions how the bird handles, especially regarding rudder inputs. Regards, Brad I've been flying my 15M LS6-b for 9 years (about 1200 hours?): Flies great, rudder is sized just big enough to allow full aileron and full rudder to initiate coordinated roll, and is not oversensitive in highspeed cruise or thermalling. Hardly notice the pedals, actually - the glider has surprisingly little adverse yaw for having full span flaperons! Kirk 66 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 10, 8:53*am, "
wrote: On Aug 10, 7:17*am, Brad wrote: I've been looking at the LS-6 gliders lately and noticed that on the LS-6C the rudder looks almost twice as big at the root chord than on the LS-6A. Is this an optical illusion, or is it real? I am guessing that since the later version of the LS-6 had tip extensions, the rudder was resized to allow for that. Would love to hear from any LS-6 drivers of the "smaller" rudder versions how the bird handles, especially regarding rudder inputs. Regards, Brad I've been flying my 15M LS6-b for 9 years (about 1200 hours?): *Flies great, rudder is sized just big enough to allow full aileron and full rudder to initiate coordinated roll, and is not oversensitive in highspeed cruise or thermalling. *Hardly notice the pedals, actually - the glider has surprisingly little adverse yaw for having full span flaperons! Kirk 66 thanks for the report Kirk! Brad |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brad wrote:
I've been looking at the LS-6 gliders lately and noticed that on the LS-6C the rudder looks almost twice as big at the root chord than on the LS-6A. Is this an optical illusion, or is it real? I am guessing that since the later version of the LS-6 had tip extensions, the rudder was resized to allow for that. Yep. Correct, the LS-6C with 17+ meter wingtip extensions got i bigger rudder to give it a bit more bite which is needed when that looong wing starts to generate drag when starting the roll to turn. Would love to hear from any LS-6 drivers of the "smaller" rudder versions how the bird handles, especially regarding rudder inputs. I have an LS-6b and the (smaller) rudder is more than enough on that one. Feels like a sports car to fly, more than ample rudder authority. Our club has an LS-6C which I've flown many times and it is very nice also but doesn't quite have the same roll-rate as the LS-6b when flying with the looong tips. So, what about the LS-6C with short wing tips on ?! Well, when thinking of it, I don't think I have ever flown that one with short tips :-). I have to try next time I get an opportunity, just for the sake of comparison. /Anders P Regards, Brad |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The larger rudder is because of the 17.5/18m tips on the LS6-c.
/Robert AndersP skrev: Brad wrote: I've been looking at the LS-6 gliders lately and noticed that on the LS-6C the rudder looks almost twice as big at the root chord than on the LS-6A. Is this an optical illusion, or is it real? I am guessing that since the later version of the LS-6 had tip extensions, the rudder was resized to allow for that. Yep. Correct, the LS-6C with 17+ meter wingtip extensions got i bigger rudder to give it a bit more bite which is needed when that looong wing starts to generate drag when starting the roll to turn. Would love to hear from any LS-6 drivers of the "smaller" rudder versions how the bird handles, especially regarding rudder inputs. I have an LS-6b and the (smaller) rudder is more than enough on that one. Feels like a sports car to fly, more than ample rudder authority. Our club has an LS-6C which I've flown many times and it is very nice also but doesn't quite have the same roll-rate as the LS-6b when flying with the looong tips. So, what about the LS-6C with short wing tips on ?! Well, when thinking of it, I don't think I have ever flown that one with short tips :-). I have to try next time I get an opportunity, just for the sake of comparison. /Anders P Regards, Brad |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
size comaprison: B-36 & B-29 | centerplace | Aviation Photos | 3 | January 11th 08 10:32 PM |
File size | Maple1 | Aviation Photos | 1 | June 16th 07 03:31 AM |
What size hole saw do I use? | [email protected] | Home Built | 22 | July 16th 05 08:21 AM |
Size does matter | HECTOP | Piloting | 59 | May 13th 04 11:48 PM |
LS4 - LS6 Fuselage size | Mark | Soaring | 15 | November 3rd 03 03:47 AM |