chemtrails

well if anyone knows you guys should! what is this phenomena all about?
we all can see normal contrails but the other sort - the ones that just
hang in the air and spread wider and wider forming fake cirrus clouds,
are we being poisened, are they reflecting back sunlight? and who is
involved with it.
this is a genuine request for information and I would be very grateful
for your comments.

wrote in message
ups.com...
well if anyone knows you guys should! what is this phenomena all about?

http://www.google.com/search?q=chemtrails

http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...ation.piloting

It's amazing how much information is already out there for someone who
bothers to look.

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 03:40:37 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...
well if anyone knows you guys should! what is this phenomena all about?

http://www.google.com/search?q=chemtrails

http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...ation.piloting

It's amazing how much information is already out there for someone who
bothers to look.

Yeah, but is the information true? Most of those hits are kook sites.

I think the Wikipedia might be considered a better source. Sure, the
Wikipedia has its faults, but I think it makes a good-faith effort to
get it right eventually.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrails

I guess a reader could compare all the sites and decide for himself.

RK Henry

"RK Henry" wrote in message
...
It's amazing how much information is already out there for someone who
bothers to look.

Yeah, but is the information true? Most of those hits are kook sites.

As with all things Internet, you need to judge your sources. A person who
can presumably sift the wheat from the chaff in a Usenet newsgroup (if he
can't he has no business asking the question here...we are notoriously
unreliable) should have no trouble figuring out what among the Google search
hits are legitimate information and which are just full of crap.

I think the Wikipedia might be considered a better source. Sure, the
Wikipedia has its faults, but I think it makes a good-faith effort to
get it right eventually.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrails

Wikipedia is usually pretty good. But a person should never trust just one
source, even if that source is something more socially accepted
(Encyclopedia Brittanica, etc.)

I guess a reader could compare all the sites and decide for himself.

Well, yes. Any reader asking for information on the Internet needs to be
able to do that. Furthermore, one of the two links I provided was a search
in this very newsgroup. It's highly unlikely this thread will generate
subsantially different information today than it did the several times it's
already come up before.

Pete

Thank you all who replied to my post, of course i have spent time
looking at many sites claiming to know about chemtrails and some of
your posts were really quite believable but the question i put to you
now is, given that the laws of physics are set ,why have C.T's only
been seen in the last few years ( since the mid nineties) surley they
should have been seen for as long as we have had jets in the sky- what
has changed ??
RK Henry wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 03:40:37 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...
well if anyone knows you guys should! what is this phenomena all about?

http://www.google.com/search?q=chemtrails

http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...ation.piloting

It's amazing how much information is already out there for someone who
bothers to look.

Yeah, but is the information true? Most of those hits are kook sites.

I think the Wikipedia might be considered a better source. Sure, the
Wikipedia has its faults, but I think it makes a good-faith effort to
get it right eventually.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrails

I guess a reader could compare all the sites and decide for himself.

RK Henry

wrote:

Thank you all who replied to my post, of course i have spent time
looking at many sites claiming to know about chemtrails and some of
your posts were really quite believable but the question i put to you
now is, given that the laws of physics are set ,why have C.T's only
been seen in the last few years ( since the mid nineties) surley they
should have been seen for as long as we have had jets in the sky- what
has changed ??

I routinely saw them in the 60s and 70s. Where have you been?

Matt

wrote in message
oups.com...
Thank you all who replied to my post, of course i have spent time
looking at many sites claiming to know about chemtrails and some of
your posts were really quite believable but the question i put to you
now is, given that the laws of physics are set ,why have C.T's only
been seen in the last few years ( since the mid nineties) surley they
should have been seen for as long as we have had jets in the sky- what
has changed ??

It's starting to sound like you *want* to believe in "chemtrails."

Condensation trails have been around since airplanes have been flying high
enough to make them--since World War Two at least.

You're chasing a unicorn.

--
Dan
C-172RG at BFM

"Dan Luke" wrote in news:128qofdqg1fe2f0
@news.supernews.com:


wrote in message
oups.com...
Thank you all who replied to my post, of course i have spent time
looking at many sites claiming to know about chemtrails and some of
your posts were really quite believable but the question i put to you
now is, given that the laws of physics are set ,why have C.T's only
been seen in the last few years ( since the mid nineties) surley they
should have been seen for as long as we have had jets in the sky- what
has changed ??

It's starting to sound like you *want* to believe in "chemtrails."

Condensation trails have been around since airplanes have been flying high
enough to make them--since World War Two at least.

You're chasing a unicorn.

Or perhaps a carnicom? Chemtrailers will get the joke.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

On 12 Jun 2006 03:08:20 -0700, wrote:

................................................. ......................,why have C.T's only
been seen in the last few years ( since the mid nineties) surley they
should have been seen for as long as we have had jets in the sky- what
has changed ??


The ozone layer was originally created to conceal the true nature of
Chemtrails in the past. One of the unforseen benefits of global
warming/cooling that is not reported by Al Gore was the opening of the
hole in the ozone layer. The protective ozone shield was breached
allowing gamma nutrino waves to reveal the chemtrails as they were
spread.

"Alan" wrote in message
...

The protective ozone shield was breached
allowing gamma nutrino waves to reveal the chemtrails as they were
spread.

This is true, but think of chemtrails as the thread binding the ozone holes
back together. Sort of a cross between the way a flesh wound heals, a
surgeon's stitching and a can of Fix-A-Flat.

They don't want to tell people 'cause it would cause the vast latenight talk
radio conspiracy constituency to panic 'cause they're whacked and they're
legion.

Fortunately, it's for a good cause.

-c