If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ka6e vs Foka4
Is there anyone who has experience with both of these sailplanes? They seems at the same price range but I don't know what would be the difference during xc flights. What about the maintenance, handling and any other issues? Thanks for your advice! /Janos |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is there anyone who has experience with both of these sailplanes?
Yes! USA Sports Class National Champion Dave Stevenson, who has won contests with both these 1960s ships in just the past few years. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I've heard he had bought a Cobra.
Built by the same guys who had tried to screw in a lightbulb (and I wonder why does that ship scored second in WGC 1970 at Marfa). Regards, -- Janusz Kęsik I believe Dave still has one of each, so he might be good person to talk to. Perhaps he'd be willing to sell one... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
See George Moffatt's "Winning on the Wind" for a more considered
comparison - no references to lightbulbs "Janos Bauer" wrote in message . .. Is there anyone who has experience with both of these sailplanes? They seems at the same price range but I don't know what would be the difference during xc flights. What about the maintenance, handling and any other issues? Thanks for your advice! /Janos |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Janos - They are both wonderful sailplanes - it comes down to personal
preference. Performance wise, the Foka is probably 5 to 10 kmh faster in cruise (which is not significant in overall xc speed), and even faster above 130. They both climb well in weak conditions with an edge to the "E" with it's lighter wing loading and "feel" for the air. The Foka enjoys a steep bank angle. They both have legendary handling characteristics - Foka has a solid/steady feel with firm ailerons, the Ka-6E a lighter, more agile feel. I prefer the reclined seating of the Foka - confortable on long flights but a narrow cockpit (I wear a bandage on my flying arm to protect from rubbing). Both have excellent airbrakes for short field landings. I prefer the sliding canopy of the Foka as it stays attached to the aircraft. The off-center CG tow release on the "E" can make for an interesting take-off if the wing runner isn't attentive! My experience on assembly is - take the K6. The Foka wings are heavier and the main pin (at least on my ship) is always a problem. Either way, you won't be disappointed. David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Ships like the K-6e are an excellent first ship for any new pilot.
Just to make sure they do not get the wrong idea from Frank's comments, I will say that in my 5 years and 600 hrs of flying my K-6e, I NEVER experienced a wing drop. Frank may be referring to the right swinging tendency caused by the left low CG tow hook. This is an entirely different issue from a wing drop and is easily handled by having the wing runner hold back appropriately on the left side wing for the first few feet of the takeoff run. Bob On 23 Jul 2003 04:35:37 -0700, (Frank Dobbs) wrote: Personally, I fly a Zugvogel IIIa. This has very similar performance, with the extra L/D of the Foka. It doesn't drop a wing on takeoff ground run like the K6e. It has loads of room in the cockpit (I can barely fit into a K6e being 6 foot 2 and a half inches tall). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|