![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What are the current regulations in regard to this? A friend of mine
in Chicago said while he was at lunch the other day he saw a Navy officer in uniform and his G-1 at a fast food joint. He was suprised to the see the flight jacket, because he was under the impression they weren't allowed to be worn off base. I figure since the guy was in uniform and the G-1 doesn't really get used in the air much anymore, that it was fine to be wearing it. Thanks, ~Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nomex (green) jacket can only be worn on flight line. You can wear it
coming on base, or leaving base but can only be "seen" in it on the flight line and the O'club. (Or entering and leaving quarters to or from the flightline.) That may be written down somewhere, but I never had a problem wearing the nomex jacket ANYWHERE on base in my entire career ... going back over thirty years. That includes the infamous era at Miramar when Field Day Fellows would post squadron XO's at the main gate to bust anyone wearing their flight jacket in their car. These days I wear one anywhere I please. R / John |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
This has happened in the last 2 or 3 years. I think it was part of the give and take that allowed us to wear flightsuits anywhere. Something had to give. Just a guess as most of it never made sense to me. JD (I like the one that allows black shoes to wear brown shoes because the women complained so much that black shoes didn't go with their khakis. (PLEASE NOTE - that reason is only rumor. What a world!) "John Carrier" wrote in message ... Nomex (green) jacket can only be worn on flight line. You can wear it coming on base, or leaving base but can only be "seen" in it on the flight line and the O'club. (Or entering and leaving quarters to or from the flightline.) That may be written down somewhere, but I never had a problem wearing the nomex jacket ANYWHERE on base in my entire career ... going back over thirty years. That includes the infamous era at Miramar when Field Day Fellows would post squadron XO's at the main gate to bust anyone wearing their flight jacket in their car. These days I wear one anywhere I please. R / John |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jake Donovan" wrote in message news:%OKjb.80113$AH4.25335@lakeread06...
Woody, You almost got it right. Leather jackets can be worn any where in khakis or flight suit. Nomex (green) jacket can only be worn on flight line. You can wear it coming on base, or leaving base but can only be "seen" in it on the flight line and the O'club. (Or entering and leaving quarters to or from the flightline.) There is some leeway made for transient pilots with downed aircraft. I honestly had a black shoe Chief quote me the regs in an on base Navy Exchange while waiting on repairs (went and had lunch). I told him "this is what I arrived in, I wasn't sitting in 40 deg weather for hours in the transient shack and if he would like, he could accompany me to the Base CO and discuss it." Backed down and said, "I guess they allow that, Capt" and walked off. JD Thanks for the answer JD. And Woody, this wasn't something I was "worried" about, just something I wondered about. I've got zero problem with a flyer wearing his G-1 off base, rules permitting or not. Thanks, ~Michael "Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote in message ... On 10/16/03 4:38 PM, in article , "Michael" wrote: What are the current regulations in regard to this? A friend of mine in Chicago said while he was at lunch the other day he saw a Navy officer in uniform and his G-1 at a fast food joint. He was suprised to the see the flight jacket, because he was under the impression they weren't allowed to be worn off base. I figure since the guy was in uniform and the G-1 doesn't really get used in the air much anymore, that it was fine to be wearing it. Thanks, ~Michael There are more important things to worry about but... My understanding of the current regulations is: Leather jackets may be worn either with khakis or with a flight suit on or off base. The green flight jacket may be worn only with the flight suit or with the "working khakis" and then only on base. Of course, I don't get spun up about it since I believe that pilots should dress like pilots and a flight suit in town (jacket or no) expresses a positive image to the public. --Woody |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/17/03 8:36 AM, in article
, "Michael" wrote: Thanks for the answer JD. And Woody, this wasn't something I was "worried" about, just something I wondered about. I've got zero problem with a flyer wearing his G-1 off base, rules permitting or not. Thanks, ~Michael "Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote in message ... On 10/16/03 4:38 PM, in article , "Michael" wrote: What are the current regulations in regard to this? A friend of mine in Chicago said while he was at lunch the other day he saw a Navy officer in uniform and his G-1 at a fast food joint. He was suprised to the see the flight jacket, because he was under the impression they weren't allowed to be worn off base. I figure since the guy was in uniform and the G-1 doesn't really get used in the air much anymore, that it was fine to be wearing it. Thanks, ~Michael There are more important things to worry about but... My understanding of the current regulations is: Leather jackets may be worn either with khakis or with a flight suit on or off base. The green flight jacket may be worn only with the flight suit or with the "working khakis" and then only on base. Of course, I don't get spun up about it since I believe that pilots should dress like pilots and a flight suit in town (jacket or no) expresses a positive image to the public. --Woody The "worried about" comment wasn't meant to be pointed directly at you, Michael. In 17 years of doing this stuff, I'm a bit frustrated at the folks who *do* make a big deal of it (for various reasons). I can understand your curiosity factor... Which is why I made the attempt at answering the question instead of ending the post after the top line. But since my nerve has been inadvertently touched, allow me a small rant... The black shoe Navy (and some senior Flag aviators who have forgotten what it was like to be a JO) have gone a two different ways with flight clothing. (a) In the past, hold the aviators down by banning them from wearing the flight suit/jackets anywhere off base. Mighty frustrating having to change out of the flight suit to get gas while USAF dudes were having lunch at Burger King in theirs... Thank goodness those days are over. (b) Currently, they have proliferated it and made it something less "special" or unique to aviation. Not that I wear khakis very often, but when I do, I am proud to be a "brown shoe." Nowadays, the black shoes have the option of wearing brown shoes too (though honestly most don't for the same reason I don't wear the black ones) BUT many of them opt for the green Nomex flight jacket (which used to be an "aviators only item) instead of the (standard) khaki jacket. It's all part of the blending and melding that's so prevalent in the military today. Rant over. I feel better. --Woody |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting contrast at Fallon and at Andrews AFB:
At Fallon, where there is barely a shoe to be found, bags off-base are a big no-no. At Andrews, where you would think you might find a few more regulation-quoters (albeit USAF ones), no problem. The Andrews situation is explained by a) a different Service culture and b) the realization that seeing guys in organizational clothing in and around the area is *good* for PR. Don't know if it's consistent across the USAF though. -Jim C. Doug \"Woody\" and Erin Beal wrote: On 10/17/03 8:36 AM, in article , "Michael" wrote: Thanks for the answer JD. And Woody, this wasn't something I was "worried" about, just something I wondered about. I've got zero problem with a flyer wearing his G-1 off base, rules permitting or not. Thanks, ~Michael "Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote in message ... On 10/16/03 4:38 PM, in article , "Michael" wrote: What are the current regulations in regard to this? A friend of mine in Chicago said while he was at lunch the other day he saw a Navy officer in uniform and his G-1 at a fast food joint. He was suprised to the see the flight jacket, because he was under the impression they weren't allowed to be worn off base. I figure since the guy was in uniform and the G-1 doesn't really get used in the air much anymore, that it was fine to be wearing it. Thanks, ~Michael There are more important things to worry about but... My understanding of the current regulations is: Leather jackets may be worn either with khakis or with a flight suit on or off base. The green flight jacket may be worn only with the flight suit or with the "working khakis" and then only on base. Of course, I don't get spun up about it since I believe that pilots should dress like pilots and a flight suit in town (jacket or no) expresses a positive image to the public. --Woody The "worried about" comment wasn't meant to be pointed directly at you, Michael. In 17 years of doing this stuff, I'm a bit frustrated at the folks who *do* make a big deal of it (for various reasons). I can understand your curiosity factor... Which is why I made the attempt at answering the question instead of ending the post after the top line. But since my nerve has been inadvertently touched, allow me a small rant... The black shoe Navy (and some senior Flag aviators who have forgotten what it was like to be a JO) have gone a two different ways with flight clothing. (a) In the past, hold the aviators down by banning them from wearing the flight suit/jackets anywhere off base. Mighty frustrating having to change out of the flight suit to get gas while USAF dudes were having lunch at Burger King in theirs... Thank goodness those days are over. (b) Currently, they have proliferated it and made it something less "special" or unique to aviation. Not that I wear khakis very often, but when I do, I am proud to be a "brown shoe." Nowadays, the black shoes have the option of wearing brown shoes too (though honestly most don't for the same reason I don't wear the black ones) BUT many of them opt for the green Nomex flight jacket (which used to be an "aviators only item) instead of the (standard) khaki jacket. It's all part of the blending and melding that's so prevalent in the military today. Rant over. I feel better. --Woody |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug \"Woody\" and Erin Beal" wrote in message ...
The "worried about" comment wasn't meant to be pointed directly at you, Michael. In 17 years of doing this stuff, I'm a bit frustrated at the folks who *do* make a big deal of it (for various reasons). I can understand your curiosity factor... Which is why I made the attempt at answering the question instead of ending the post after the top line. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I wasn't sure if you felt I was one of the uptight people that worried about stuff like that. But since my nerve has been inadvertently touched, allow me a small rant... The black shoe Navy (and some senior Flag aviators who have forgotten what it was like to be a JO) have gone a two different ways with flight clothing. (a) In the past, hold the aviators down by banning them from wearing the flight suit/jackets anywhere off base. Mighty frustrating having to change out of the flight suit to get gas while USAF dudes were having lunch at Burger King in theirs... Thank goodness those days are over. (b) Currently, they have proliferated it and made it something less "special" or unique to aviation. Not that I wear khakis very often, but when I do, I am proud to be a "brown shoe." Nowadays, the black shoes have the option of wearing brown shoes too (though honestly most don't for the same reason I don't wear the black ones) Why are they given the option of wearing brown shoes now?! BUT many of them opt for the green Nomex flight jacket (which used to be an "aviators only item) instead of the (standard) khaki jacket. Hmm, that's no good. The Nomex should remain an aviator only garment. ~Michael |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug- It's all part of the blending and melding that's so prevalent in the
military today. Rant over. I feel better. BRBR After spending an exchange tour with the USAF, and seeing that there wasn't much the USN could learn from the USAF...One thing the USN could learn is how to 'view' a zoom bag..as a uni or as 'flight gear'..the USAF sure has this one right... P. C. Chisholm CDR, USN(ret.) Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
100 years of flight - Special coverage by The Cincinnati Enquirer | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 1 | March 14th 04 02:42 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |