SR-71

"Glenn" wrote in message
...


Great shot! What kind of camera and lens were you using?

"Glenn" wrote in message
...

In this picture, a couple feet back on the chine on both sides, there is a
blunted, pushed in area on the chines. Almost looks like the nose ran into
a round hole in a wall, and dented the chines. Of course, I doubt that
happened.

What is the story with that? I had never noticed that on other models of
the 71. Is that damage, or a feature, and if it is a feature, what is it
designed to do - if you or someone knows?
--
Jim in NC

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Glenn" wrote in message
...

In this picture, a couple feet back on the chine on both sides, there is a
blunted, pushed in area on the chines. Almost looks like the nose ran
into a round hole in a wall, and dented the chines. Of course, I doubt
that happened.

What is the story with that? I had never noticed that on other models of
the 71. Is that damage, or a feature, and if it is a feature, what is it
designed to do - if you or someone knows?
--
Jim in NC

The original aircraft from which the SR-71 sprang was the Lockheed A-11. It
then morphed into the YF-12. Finally, it became the SR-71. The A-11 and the
YF-12A sported a different nose/chine configuration than what you finally
got to see on the SR_71.

Nick

Not that one it is an sr71 I believe that is a later modification


Canuck wrote:

"Morgans" wrote in message
...


"Glenn" wrote in message
...


In this picture, a couple feet back on the chine on both sides, there
is a blunted, pushed in area on the chines. Almost looks like the
nose ran into a round hole in a wall, and dented the chines. Of
course, I doubt that happened.

What is the story with that? I had never noticed that on other models
of the 71. Is that damage, or a feature, and if it is a feature, what
is it designed to do - if you or someone knows?
--
Jim in NC


The original aircraft from which the SR-71 sprang was the Lockheed A-11.
It then morphed into the YF-12. Finally, it became the SR-71. The A-11
and the YF-12A sported a different nose/chine configuration than what
you finally got to see on the SR_71.

Nick

"Maple1" wrote in message
...

Not that one it is an sr71 I believe that is a later modification

What is the story with that? I had never noticed that on other models
of the 71. Is that damage, or a feature, and if it is a feature, what
is it designed to do - if you or someone knows?
--
Jim in NC


The original aircraft from which the SR-71 sprang was the Lockheed A-11.
It then morphed into the YF-12. Finally, it became the SR-71. The A-11
and the YF-12A sported a different nose/chine configuration than what you
finally got to see on the SR_71.

Nick


Hmmmm....curious/strange. I went and had a look and you are right. My foggy
memory failed me. The A-11/YF-12A nosecones were different but not like what
is present in that image. It almost seems like an intermediate morph between
the A-11/YF-12A and the SR-71.

The other possibility is that someone bent it.

Nick

"Canuck" wrote in

Hmmmm....curious/strange. I went and had a look and you are right. My
foggy memory failed me. The A-11/YF-12A nosecones were different but
not like what is present in that image. It almost seems like an
intermediate morph between the A-11/YF-12A and the SR-71.

The other possibility is that someone bent it.

Nick


Attachment decoded: YF-12A.jpg
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01CADF55.58129EF0--


This photo is the YF-12A and the chine mod is for the ASG-18 fire
control radar. to insure directional stability for the chine being cut
three small fins were added to the rear of the underside of the YF-12A

"Morgans" wrote in
:


"Glenn" wrote in message
...

In this picture, a couple feet back on the chine on both sides, there
is a blunted, pushed in area on the chines. Almost looks like the
nose ran into a round hole in a wall, and dented the chines. Of
course, I doubt that happened.

What is the story with that? I had never noticed that on other models
of the 71. Is that damage, or a feature, and if it is a feature, what
is it designed to do - if you or someone knows?


Those "dents" are the modification for the ECM antennas.
(Electronic counter measures)

In message , John Szalay
writes
"Morgans" wrote in
:


"Glenn" wrote in message
...

In this picture, a couple feet back on the chine on both sides, there
is a blunted, pushed in area on the chines. Almost looks like the
nose ran into a round hole in a wall, and dented the chines. Of
course, I doubt that happened.

What is the story with that? I had never noticed that on other models
of the 71. Is that damage, or a feature, and if it is a feature, what
is it designed to do - if you or someone knows?


Those "dents" are the modification for the ECM antennas.
(Electronic counter measures)

I thought they were where the ground crew were supposed to push if the
brakes failed...
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!

Peter Twydell wrote in news:NuUUztCC0FzLFwd3
Those "dents" are the modification for the ECM antennas.
(Electronic counter measures)

I thought they were where the ground crew were supposed to push if the
brakes failed...


Only if they are wearing asbestos gloves, it takes a while for the airframe
of the Blackbird to cool after flight..