![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Over the years (30 or so) Caesar Creek Soaring Club has vacillated
with setting the altimeter to zero or MSL. Last year the Board decided to put the Club ships on an MSL basis (private gliders exempted). There are however a number of members who are continuing to make it an issue. I would be interested in your thought and comments. Thanks Rolf Hegele CCSC President |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/31/2010 7:07 PM, Rolf wrote:
Over the years (30 or so) Caesar Creek Soaring Club has vacillated with setting the altimeter to zero or MSL. Last year the Board decided to put the Club ships on an MSL basis (private gliders exempted). There are however a number of members who are continuing to make it an issue. I would be interested in your thought and comments. Thanks Rolf Hegele CCSC President It seems to me it would make a lot more sense to use MSL, as then the elevation on the altimeter will correspond to the elevations on the sectionals and other charts and maps. What is the rationale for using AGL? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
York Soaring in Ontario, Canada just switched over to MSL for the club
operations after using AGL for so many years. It was hotly debated with arguments on both sides. AGL is great for basic training. We teach the circuit based on AGL: 800'-1000' at the IP to start the circuit, turn base at 400'-600' and turn final at 300'-500'. Real quick and simple, just read it off the altimeter with no math conversion. Minimises the mental load on a student pilot. Causes minor problems in operations, though: - xc pilots work on MSL but the club ships were AGL, so moving the dials back and forth - pilots confusing MSL vs AGL readings - power pilots are on MSL, people would confuse heights given over the radio, thinking it was AGL As a concession to those firmly entrenched with AGL, we've put printed stick-on rings around the altimeters that has AGL markings specific for our club. The thousands pointer indicates zero AGL when set to field elevation. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 7:28*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 5/31/2010 7:07 PM, Rolf wrote: Over the years (30 or so) Caesar Creek Soaring Club has vacillated with setting the altimeter to zero or MSL. Last year the Board decided to put the Club ships on an MSL basis (private gliders exempted). There are however a number of members who are continuing to make it an issue. I would be interested in your thought and comments. Thanks Rolf Hegele CCSC President It seems to me it would make a lot more sense to use MSL, as then the elevation on the altimeter will correspond to the elevations on the sectionals and other charts and maps. *What is the rationale for using AGL? There is absolutly no rationale for setting the altimeter to AGL.The only excuse I am willing to accept, and it is a rather poor one, if he or she would NEVER EVER be willing to be out of glide to their home field. And how many glider pilots were NEVER EVER in that position? 6PK |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 8:22*pm, PK wrote:
There is absolutly no rationale for setting the altimeter to AGL.The only excuse I am willing to accept, and it is a rather poor one, if he or she would NEVER EVER be willing to be out of glide to their home field. And how many glider pilots were NEVER EVER in that position? 6PK Not even that! What if the pilot hears a radio call such as "Airport XYZ traffic, Cessna 1234, 2 miles south crossing midfield at 2500"? Where will he be looking? Up? Down? When I flew at CCSC 18 or so years ago, I would set the club ship's altimeter to the CORRECT setting, and let the next pilot deal with it. -Tom |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rolf wrote:
Over the years (30 or so) Caesar Creek Soaring Club has vacillated with setting the altimeter to zero or MSL. Last year the Board decided to put the Club ships on an MSL basis (private gliders exempted). There are however a number of members who are continuing to make it an issue. I would be interested in your thought and comments. Thanks Rolf Hegele CCSC President The English way is (or at least was) to set QFE for landings and takeoffs, and to set QNH at (if I remember) 3000 ft. The station baro setting for QFE was transmitted on arrival at destination. En-route, the forecast QNH was used. Both settings were provided in millibars. Oh, I should translate QNH to mean a baro setting = 0 ft "Altitude" at mean sea level and QFE baro setting reads 0 ft "height" at station elevation. The American way is to use QNH until at flight level altitudes the pressure altitude setting of 29.92 inHg comes into play. The American way minimizes screwing around with baro settings: a current QNH value may be obtained by tuning ATIS, AWOS etc. frequencies en route. The English way can I suppose lead to better pattern altitudes ( = circuit heights) because they can always be 500 ft, 1000 ft, or 400 ft., 800 ft indications. The American way involves descending to a pattern altitude as given by elevation (from the chart) + pattern height. At Altus for example, that would be 1433 + 1000 ft For what it's worth... Brian W |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They must all decide if they wish to be airmen or mere pilots. Those
wishing to select zero are lazy and don't want to think or maintain an acceptable level of airmenship. Those who allow such practice are tired of beating a dead dog to fetch a bone. Here's the thing.... when the canopy closes, who's to know. The individual is still responsible for his performance. The club should establish the level of expected performance and standard operating procedures. This level must be high knowing that some individuals will slack off 20+%. Training to 95% - 20% is just within acceptable levels. But train to 80% , well now you have to have good insurance and extra gliders. The good side of weak requirements is the increase demonstration of Darwins theory of Evolution and the improvement to the gene pool. Wait till someone has to tell the old geezers they fly like crap and no longer are allowed. They won't be thinking MSL anymore. 30 years to decide, huh? All of you should go back to school. Who the hell is in charge? R |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rolf,
From the inception of the club to about 5 years ago, we flew and taught AGL only. No self respecting power pilot would fly AGL. Flying AGL is a crutch intended to help new pilots. But It is better to learn it right from the get-go than to have to relearn it later and maybe getting into an accident. So about 5 years ago my Club's flight chair said that flying AGL was wrong, dangerous and (if I am not mistaken) illegal. So the board made an edict and we changed overnight at the start of a season. We marked all altimeters in club ships "MSL Only Club Policy". There was some, but not a tremendous amount of, consternation ... such as "But it is so flat around here." or "But I always land back home." We did have one incident related to the AGL/MSL switch that might be a good to read about. One day yours truly flew a club ship and set the altimeter to MSL. The next pilot was an die hard AGL'er. The AGL'ers were used to finding the altimer not quite at zero due to barometric changes and would "tweak" the altimeter to zero at the start of each flight. Our field elevation is 888 feet. So the next pilot tweaks the altimeter to "zero" but instead of subtracting 888 feet (by moving the hands CCW), he tweaks it CW and adds 112 feet! Can you see where this is going? He then takes a tow to what he thinks is 3,000 feet AGL but is only really at 2,000 feet AGL. The tow pilot doesn't think much about it as people get off tow early all the time. About to enter the pattern the AGL'er thinks, "Gee, the ground seems to be kind of large today ... but I am still at 1500 feet AGL so I'm must be OK." He then almost lands short as he was 1,000 feet lower than he thought. End of story? Nah. The AGL'er gets back on the ground and complains that the altimeter must be wrong. We look at the altimer and see that it is showing 1,000 feet. Putting 2+2 together we figured out what he did. So get this ... an old timer CFIG says it was my fault as I should have reset the altimeter to zero when I got out. Sorry, wrong-o. Who was the PIC on the second flight? The AGL'er of course. It is his responsibility to ensure that the instrumentation is set correctly, not mine. Can you tell that it still grates a bit? Ok, I feel better now. Anyway, my suggestions are to; 1) Do it! 2) Convert "big bang" all at once, not by dribs and drabs or over a "transition" period. 3) Mark the altimeter with an "MSL Only" sign to reenforce the new policy each time a pilot climbs into the cockpit. Good luck, John DeRosa PS Early in my soaring career, I remember flying at a commercial operation while on a business trip and was told to set the altimeter to MSL. I started sweating worrying about all the math I would need to calculate in my head. Luckily I was in Miami at the time and the field elevation was all of 20 feet - not much of a problem. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/31/2010 8:06 PM, ContestID67 wrote:
He then takes a tow to what he thinks is 3,000 feet AGL but is only really at 2,000 feet AGL. The tow pilot doesn't think much about it as people get off tow early all the time. About to enter the pattern the AGL'er thinks, "Gee, the ground seems to be kind of large today ... but I am still at 1500 feet AGL so I'm must be OK." He then almost lands short as he was 1,000 feet lower than he thought. End of story? Nah. The poor guy couldn't tell the difference between 500' AGL and 1500' AGL by looking out the window? Sounds like it was time to retire his wings. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 11:22*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 5/31/2010 8:06 PM, ContestID67 wrote: He then takes a tow to what he thinks is 3,000 feet AGL but is only really at 2,000 feet AGL. *The tow pilot doesn't think much about it as people get off tow early all the time. *About to enter the pattern the AGL'er thinks, "Gee, the ground seems to be kind of large today ... but I am still at 1500 feet AGL so I'm must be OK." *He then almost lands short as he was 1,000 feet lower than he thought. *End of story? *Nah. The poor guy couldn't tell the difference between 500' AGL and 1500' AGL by looking out the window? *Sounds like it was time to retire his wings.. Here's a good one. I usually fly out of a busy general aviation airport right on the edge of Class C airspace. We are surrounded by mountains, talk to power planes and controllers, and fly cross country a lot, so we always use MSL. Recently I spent a sunny afternoon down at the local gliderport where they do a lot of training. I took a tow to the ridge and got off at about 3,200 (MSL). Much later that afternoon, the owner was up flying so I asked someone what I owed for the tow. They asked me how high I went and I said "3,200 feet." A quick look at the handy chart on the wall told me what I owed them for "3,200 feet" and I happily paid and left. On the drive home I was musing about how the price of tows was always going up, but who cares when the planes and gadgets cost so damned much. Then it hit me WHY they were going up. The gliderport uses AGL for training AND to calculate the tows to simplify the billing, and I hadn't deducted the field elevation when I told him "3,200 feet." I had bought about 800 feet of it sitting at the end of the runway waiting to hook up. All I could do was laugh at myself, and they are welcome to the tip for all they do for all of us. At least I hadn't scratched around cross country for two hours with my gear down like I usually do... Now THAT ****es me off! Don |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: used 57mm Altimeter OR swap for 80mm Altimeter | joesimmers | Soaring | 0 | November 3rd 09 11:59 AM |
setting up a Garmin 296 | Cub Driver | Piloting | 10 | October 29th 04 08:43 PM |
Altimeter setting != Sea Level Pressure - Why? | JT Wright | Piloting | 5 | April 5th 04 01:04 AM |
Setting QNH | BTIZ | Piloting | 31 | March 12th 04 04:29 PM |
Setting up the workshop.... | Evan Batchelor | Restoration | 3 | March 4th 04 02:54 PM |