![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am attempting to get this group back on subject by requesting those
with infomation and comments on the U.S. Navy reconnaissance aircraft known as the RA-5C to make them. This group has moved way beyond the intended subject matter. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/7/2010 12:21 PM, Nikon wrote:
I am attempting to get this group back on subject by requesting those with infomation and comments on the U.S. Navy reconnaissance aircraft known as the RA-5C to make them. This group has moved way beyond the intended subject matter. The Vig was an interesting aircraft with great flight performance. Originally designed as a bomber, the integral bomb bay between the engines was never made to work. On the other hand, North American marketed a variant to the Air Force as a long range interceptor, inserting a third J-79 into the bomb bay. I never read the estimate flight characteristics but rate of climb should have been phenomena. The maximum mach number wouldn't change because the airplane would get soft above Mach 2 or so. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
North American O-47 | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 1st 09 09:47 AM |
North American Trojan VH-ZSH | TacAN | Aviation Photos | 13 | August 13th 09 04:16 AM |
North American AT 6F Texan | Gene Park | Aviation Photos | 0 | May 21st 08 07:46 AM |
North American F-100A | J.F. | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 6th 07 02:30 AM |