![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A question for you racing rules makers out the
Does the closed airspace rule (loss of all points plus 100 pt penalty) apply if, following a task abort on course (with enough distance on task to score for the day), a pilot then overflies class C airspace (legally, and in contact with approach, etc), enroute to a safe recovery back at the home base? The question really boils down to: Are you still "on task" after you make a decision to abandon the declared task for reasons of safety - say weather blocking other routes - or to avoid a landout, or both, then legally overfly airspace on the way home? Since the task scoring ends where you abandon the task and assuming you abort outside closed airspace, one could argue that the return flight is the same as an aero retrieve, where the penalty wouldn't apply, since it's perfectly legal and easy to overfly lots of airspace out here in the west. As currently interpreted, this rule makes you potentially fly a riskier and/or longer route when you are probably trying to get home late in the day, which seems counter productive and potentially unsafe. And there is precedent in the airfield landout bonus for rewarding a safer decision over "pushing on regardless". I have no objection to the closed airspace rule while still on task, although the 500 ft minor and 100 ft major violation vertical distances seem a bit draconian and encourage "clock watching" a bit too much - not a good idea if everyone is blasting along under a cloudstreet at 17499'. Perhaps we should look at the FAI rules and see how they handle it? Anyway, enough sniveling... Cheers, Kirk 66 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 10:22*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
A question for you racing rules makers out the Does the closed airspace rule (loss of all points plus 100 pt penalty) apply if, following a task abort on course (with enough distance on task to score for the day), a pilot then overflies class C airspace (legally, and in contact with approach, etc), enroute to a safe recovery back at the home base? I really don't understand why US has to have a different set of contest rules from the rest of the world. The FAI rules seem far more sensible when it comes to handling airspace. Andy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy" wrote in message : On Sep 7, 10:22*am, "kirk.stant" wrote: A question for you racing rules makers out the Does the closed airspace rule (loss of all points plus 100 pt penalty) apply if, following a task abort on course (with enough distance on task to score for the day), a pilot then overflies class C airspace (legally, and in contact with approach, etc), enroute to a safe recovery back at the home base? I really don't understand why US has to have a different set of contest rules from the rest of the world. The FAI rules seem far more sensible when it comes to handling airspace. Andy OTOH, I don't know why the FAI has to use a different set of contest rules from the US... But that's just me I guess... Larry "01" USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 11:28*am, "Larry Goddard" wrote:
"Andy" wrote in message : On Sep 7, 10:22*am, "kirk.stant" wrote: A question for you racing rules makers out the Does the closed airspace rule (loss of all points plus 100 pt penalty) apply if, following a task abort on course (with enough distance on task to score for the day), a pilot then overflies class C airspace (legally, and in contact with approach, etc), enroute to a safe recovery back at the home base? I really don't understand why US has to have a different set of contest rules from the rest of the world. The FAI rules seem far more sensible when it comes to handling airspace. Andy OTOH, I don't know why the FAI has to use a different set of contest rules from the US... *But that's just me I guess... Larry "01" USA The CD and scorer's interpretation of the rules was that if a contestant had taken a legal start and flown on course, the whole flight must be conducted under contest rules, even after you have abandoned the task. I agree with Kirk, flying legally above closed airspace should not be penalized after the task is abandoned. Mike |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 2:58*pm, Mike the Strike wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:28*am, "Larry Goddard" wrote: "Andy" wrote in message : On Sep 7, 10:22*am, "kirk.stant" wrote: A question for you racing rules makers out the Does the closed airspace rule (loss of all points plus 100 pt penalty) apply if, following a task abort on course (with enough distance on task to score for the day), a pilot then overflies class C airspace (legally, and in contact with approach, etc), enroute to a safe recovery back at the home base? I really don't understand why US has to have a different set of contest rules from the rest of the world. The FAI rules seem far more sensible when it comes to handling airspace. Andy OTOH, I don't know why the FAI has to use a different set of contest rules from the US... *But that's just me I guess... Larry "01" USA The CD and scorer's interpretation of the rules was that if a contestant had taken a legal start and flown on course, the whole flight must be conducted under contest rules, even after you have abandoned the task. I agree with Kirk, flying legally above closed airspace should not be penalized after the task is abandoned. Mike For any flight for which you must turn in a log (i.e. any launch taken from the contest site after grid time and before the day is canceled) you may not enter closed airspace. You can violate closed airspace and incur the penalty whether you start or not and whether the day is canceled or not. The SSA rationale is simple - great emphasis is placed on avoiding any (even inadvertent) B, C, P, R violations within the context of a sanctioned SSA contest. Although this was implemented before I was elected to the Rules Committee, I understand that the thinking was to avoid drawing FAA actions as a result of SSA sanctioned activities. Others before me can provide additional background. Another consideration here is that scorers already have enough work to do without arbitrating "was the task clearly abandoned and when." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 5:50*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)" wrote:
For any flight for which you must turn in a log (i.e. any launch taken from the contest site after grid time and before the day is canceled) you may not enter closed airspace. *You can violate closed airspace and incur the penalty whether you start or not and whether the day is canceled or not. No doubt that this is what SSA rules require but the rules really need a review and I'd suggest bringing the airspace violation rules in line with FAI. In this case the FAI rules would have scored 66 (the OP) to the point of furthest progress and there would have been no penalty. The stupidity of the situation is that 66 would be 100 points better off if he had a logger failure than if he announced his intention to abandon the task, made a completely legal class C overflight, and then turned in his log. I hope 66 was not depending on the prize money to buy groceries this week. Andy (the scorer in this instance) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think QT is right, though it took some puzzling over the rules for
me to see it. Actually, I think that having a mysterious flight log failure will not get you out of trouble. A valid log has to show takeoff, path of flight and landing (see below), and if there are any gaps, the cd is supposed to assume you went real fast right to the prohibited space. That says "path of flight and landing" not just "task." Now should we change it? The event -- you abandon the task, want to fly home, and the only way to do it safely is go over a class C, and you have a radio and transponder -- seems pretty remote. Was it really unsafe to go around, or was it just extra gas for a motorglider? 10.5.2 Flight Log requirements 10.5.2.1 A valid Flight Log is one that: • Was produced by a Flight Recorder that meets the provisions of Rule 6.7.4 • Shows the takeoff, the path of the flight, and the landing. • Has a typical interval between fixes of 15 seconds or less. • Between takeoff and landing, shows no interval between fixes exceeding 15 minutes (See Rule 6.3.3.2 for motorized sailplanes constraint). 10.12.5 Gaps in a Flight Log longer than one minute shall be interpreted unfavorably to the pilot. During each such gap: • the closest horizontal approach to or from the nearest closed airspace shall be calculated assuming a speed of 100 mph • if in the judgment of the CD there was any realistic possibility of a vertical airspace violation, the closest vertical approach to the nearest closed airspace shall be calculated based on a climb rate of 1000 feet per minute John Cochrane |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 11:28*am, "Larry Goddard" wrote:
"Andy" wrote in message : On Sep 7, 10:22*am, "kirk.stant" wrote: A question for you racing rules makers out the Does the closed airspace rule (loss of all points plus 100 pt penalty) apply if, following a task abort on course (with enough distance on task to score for the day), a pilot then overflies class C airspace (legally, and in contact with approach, etc), enroute to a safe recovery back at the home base? I really don't understand why US has to have a different set of contest rules from the rest of the world. The FAI rules seem far more sensible when it comes to handling airspace. Andy OTOH, I don't know why the FAI has to use a different set of contest rules from the US... *But that's just me I guess... Larry "01" USA Perhaps looking at the number of participant in each area would give you a clue? Perhaps looking a what rules are applied when a World Championship is held in USA would provide another? Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fed: Planes flying in "commercial" airspace must get GPS | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 66 | June 4th 10 12:54 PM |
(USA) US/Mexico "airspace" (boundary) files available | Tuno | Soaring | 4 | March 27th 10 07:17 PM |
On Sharing airspace with "non-rated UAV "pilots" | vaughn | Piloting | 15 | March 15th 09 04:08 PM |
"Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace" | Ron Wanttaja | Piloting | 27 | September 5th 07 08:30 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 02:42 PM |