![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frode Berg wrote:
The plane I co-own is IFR ready, but has no autopilot or stormscope, no de-ice (no options for it either I think, Arrow 180) and a Garmin 95 VFR GPS. What would be the most immediate need to safely fly IFR single pilot, single engine? The autopilot (would get a one-axis S-tec which easily upgrades to two axis later), a Garmin 300 or 430 GPS, or a WX-900 stormscope. Single pilot IFR? My vote would go to the autopilot, hands down. I suppose you have much less need for it than I do, because the Arrow is a more stable plane, but even so, it's nice to have the ability to look at a chart, write down a clearance, or eat a snack momentarily without having to recover from a rapidly steepening bank. As for other upgrades, what you get the most use out of really depends upon what kind of flying you do. I'm not familiar with the aviation rules where you fly, but someone in US who flies mostly into busy airports and in radar environments doesn't have much need for an IFR GPS IMO. He can still fly direct by radar vectors backed up by VFR GPS. Most of the airports he's using are served by an ILS or at worst, a LOC or on-field VOR, so he isn't getting a lot of extra utility out of an approach GPS. OTOH, we fly a lot where there isn't radar coverage once one descends for approach and the only choice to get into the airport is NDB or GPS or a VOR 30 miles off the field. Stormscope, similar kind of thing. What are the wx patterns where you fly? We want it because there are wx patterns where we fly where if for some reason one must go VFR, it's harder to figure out the best routing and because sometimes IMC, it's supposed to be benign but we get there and whups, there are isolated tstorms embedded, Beam Me Up Scotty. It's at the top of my "want" list currently, but we already have an IFR GPS and a wing-leveler autopilot. Cheers, Sydney |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depends where you are flying. If in the NE, I'd opt for the stormscope over the
A/P. Stormscope will give you peace of mind in the typical 3-4 nm visibility in haze. A/P is handy for checking maps etc, but you can do that without an A/P without compromising your mission availability. I put both in mine last fall after flying 7 years without either. I use the stormscope far more than the A/P. Frode Berg wrote: Hi! I am hoping to commence IR training sometime this fall. The plane I co-own is IFR ready, but has no autopilot or stormscope, no de-ice (no options for it either I think, Arrow 180) and a Garmin 95 VFR GPS. What would be the most immediate need to safely fly IFR single pilot, single engine? The autopilot (would get a one-axis S-tec which easily upgrades to two axis later), a Garmin 300 or 430 GPS, or a WX-900 stormscope. All at once is not an option financially, since only one more pilot is IR rated anyway. Also, anyone with any experience with a WX-900 stormscope, what are your opinions on this? Thanks Frode Berg -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An STEC A/P is a reasonable substitute for a backup electric AI. It is a rate
based system that runs on the trun coordinator gyro, so if you AI or vacuum system goes T-U, George can keep the shiny side up and even track nav-aids for you while you monitor the partial panel. Richard Kaplan wrote: "Frode Berg" wrote in message ... What would be the most immediate need to safely fly IFR single pilot, single engine? Where will you fly? If thunderstorms will be present at all then the Stormscope is clearly first to get utility out of your plane. Second is a backup electric AI. Third is an autopilot. Last is an IFR GPS -- this allows you to fly direct but does not otherwise add more utility or safety that you do not have with your existing equipment. -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GNS 480 means no GNS 430 upgrade ? | Scott Moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | September 4th 04 04:05 AM |
Confusion Surrounds F/A-22 Upgrade Program | John Cook | Military Aviation | 11 | March 23rd 04 06:30 PM |
CF-105 AVRO Arrow etc. | Ed Majden | Military Aviation | 4 | February 22nd 04 07:00 PM |
"What if" questions regarding TSR.2, Avro Arrow | M. Santoro | Military Aviation | 12 | January 27th 04 09:42 PM |
FS: Upgrade Compaq iPaq H3650 | Juan Jimenez | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | October 3rd 03 09:39 PM |