![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All.
I'm contemplating building a float plane - west coast of Canada. I've flown mostly C-180 and C-185 on floats, so I have a pre-conception that aluminum is a good material for the salt water environment. Murphy's a good choice and local too. I like Zenair's 801 as well. Been intrigued for years with the Bearhawk - now in kit form. Seems to be a good balance of cost, utility and mission. Am I prejudiced to think that steel frame and fabric is just bad around salt water? Thanks, Ed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05 Dec 2003 02:41 PM, Ed Bryant posted the following:
Hello All. I'm contemplating building a float plane - west coast of Canada. I've flown mostly C-180 and C-185 on floats, so I have a pre-conception that aluminum is a good material for the salt water environment. Murphy's a good choice and local too. I like Zenair's 801 as well. Been intrigued for years with the Bearhawk - now in kit form. Seems to be a good balance of cost, utility and mission. Am I prejudiced to think that steel frame and fabric is just bad around salt water? If it is not properly protected, aluminum will be destroyed in a corrosive environment just as certainly as tube and fabric will. Your Cessnas most likely had the factory seaplane option which included corrosion proofing not found on the standard models. At least with a tube fuselage, if it rusts you can cut out the bad parts and weld in new tubing. With an all aluminum bird getting rid of corrosion might be a real headache. I'm building my Bearhawk for exactly the use you propose: Flying the Alaska coast with landings in the salt water. The all-aluminum wings will be alodined and primed prior to assembly, and the steel tube parts will be either powder coated or epoxy primed and then covered with modern polyester fabric. I don't anticipate any problems over and above what you would expect from an all-aluminum airplane. I will most likely be in my mid to late 30s when I finish it, and I expect to pass it down to my kids someday. ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Del Rawlins" wrote in message
... I'm building my Bearhawk for exactly the use you propose: Flying the Alaska coast with landings in the salt water. The all-aluminum wings will be alodined and primed prior to assembly, and the steel tube parts will be either powder coated or epoxy primed and then covered with modern polyester fabric. I don't anticipate any problems over and above what you would expect from an all-aluminum airplane. I will most likely be in my mid to late 30s when I finish it, and I expect to pass it down to my kids someday. I remember when I was in my mid 30's and landed at Half Moon Bay; just because it was mentioned as an alternate airport in "The High and the Mighty". My buddy and I were stretching our legs walking the tiedowns when we came across what could have been a nice looking Cessna 170 B. The tires were low on air and the windows were clouded with age. Sitting in the salt air next to the Pacific Ocean had evidently taken its toll. I bent to avoid the flap and tried to peer in the cabin, but the Plexiglas obscured my view. I happened to look up at the underside of the wing and noticed a mold spot on the paint. I pointed it out to my flying partner while pressing my forefinger on the spot. It went through the aluminum up to my knuckle, making a ragged 3/4" hole in the skin. What a shame. Oh - not the airplane. It's a shame that it was thirty years ago. I suppose youth is being wasted on Del, just like it was on me. At least I take a whiz every morning at 6:00 and a dump at 7:00. I just wish I could get out of bed before 8:00. Rich |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05 Dec 2003 04:02 PM, Rich S. posted the following:
I bent to avoid the flap and tried to peer in the cabin, but the Plexiglas obscured my view. I happened to look up at the underside of the wing and noticed a mold spot on the paint. I pointed it out to my flying partner while pressing my forefinger on the spot. It went through the aluminum up to my knuckle, making a ragged 3/4" hole in the skin. That sounds like an Alaskan airplane for sure. The salt air on the coast just destroys any metal that isn't well protected. For example, in my driveway there sits a 30 year old truck with no original body panels except for the hood, which I was able to save. Price of living and working less than 100 yards from the ocean, in the rain capital of the world. What a shame. Oh - not the airplane. It's a shame that it was thirty years ago. I suppose youth is being wasted on Del, just like it was on me. At least I take a whiz every morning at 6:00 and a dump at 7:00. I just wish I could get out of bed before 8:00. LOL. I'm not sure exactly how to respond to that. ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05 Dec 2003 02:41 PM, Ed Bryant posted the following:
Hello All. I'm contemplating building a float plane - west coast of Canada. I've flown mostly C-180 and C-185 on floats, so I have a pre-conception that aluminum is a good material for the salt water environment. Murphy's a good choice and local too. I like Zenair's 801 as well. As an afterthought, the ONLY reason I would consider the Zenair 801 is because, IIRC, it is constructed primarily of 6061T6 alloy which has a much higher corrosion resistance than the 2024 used in the Bearhawk wings and your Cessnas. I just don't think I could tolerate the terrible looks or the lack of speed. Shoot, with a Bearhawk or a C-180 you would probably save enough time just on account of the cruising speed difference to build another airplane after the first one corrodes away. 8^) ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just checked the Murphy site and they use 6061-T6 as well.
"Del Rawlins" wrote in message ... On 05 Dec 2003 02:41 PM, Ed Bryant posted the following: Hello All. I'm contemplating building a float plane - west coast of Canada. I've flown mostly C-180 and C-185 on floats, so I have a pre-conception that aluminum is a good material for the salt water environment. Murphy's a good choice and local too. I like Zenair's 801 as well. As an afterthought, the ONLY reason I would consider the Zenair 801 is because, IIRC, it is constructed primarily of 6061T6 alloy which has a much higher corrosion resistance than the 2024 used in the Bearhawk wings and your Cessnas. I just don't think I could tolerate the terrible looks or the lack of speed. Shoot, with a Bearhawk or a C-180 you would probably save enough time just on account of the cruising speed difference to build another airplane after the first one corrodes away. 8^) ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|