![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seeing the thread about a DE who seemed to have the wrong idea about
communication frequency areas on a chart made me think of something that's been bugging me since my check ride. The DE asked, "What kind of oil do you put in the airplane we're going to fly?" I told him the plane used 50 weight ashless dispersant oil. He replied that the plane actually used 100 weight oil. I was pretty sure he was wrong but I let it go. Later, I grabbed a pint out of the box in the office and it said "50W" but also had a "100" above that. I see why he made the mistake. Or did he? I dug around on the AeroShell web site and found products labeled similary: OIL W 100 SAE 50 - ASHLESS DISPERSANT Looking through their FAQ, it appears that this a multi-viscosity oil. Is that right? 50-100 multi-weight? Why is the label different from automotive oil (e.g, "5W-30")? What's really confusing is the W in front of the 100, followed by SAE. Maybe there's an organization other than the SAE that sets the standards for aviation oil? -Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Lowrey wrote: Maybe there's an organization other than the SAE that sets the standards for aviation oil? You've got it. 100W aviation oil is 50W SAE. George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scott Lowrey" wrote in message
news:xGEic.24898$IW1.1210282@attbi_s52... [...] Later, I grabbed a pint out of the box in the office and it said "50W" but also had a "100" above that. I see why he made the mistake. Or did he? I dug around on the AeroShell web site and found products labeled similary: OIL W 100 SAE 50 - ASHLESS DISPERSANT Just to clarify beyond George's answer... The oil you looked at was NOT multi-weight. It simply had both kinds of units printed on the bottle. Like your soda bottle showing fluid ounces and liters. It happens that the two measurements are exactly different by a factor of 2, making conversion easy. ![]() Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article xGEic.24898$IW1.1210282@attbi_s52,
Scott Lowrey wrote: The DE asked, "What kind of oil do you put in the airplane we're going to fly?" I told him the plane used 50 weight ashless dispersant oil. He replied that the plane actually used 100 weight oil. I was pretty sure he was wrong but I let it go. Shell has a lot of publications about aviation oil on their website. Among other things their FAQ mentions that you can mix any of their oils, so you don't have to know what's in the plane, you can put in anything suitable. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ben Jackson" wrote in message
news:iM0jc.36507$w96.2637433@attbi_s54... In article xGEic.24898$IW1.1210282@attbi_s52, Shell has a lot of publications about aviation oil on their website. Among other things their FAQ mentions that you can mix any of their oils, so you don't have to know what's in the plane, you can put in anything suitable. That still didn't make me feel better when I put that quart of 60 weight oil in with the 15W50 when it was 15F outside. Man, did THAT ever take a long time to pour. In hindsight, maybe running a quart low for the 30 minute flight would have been a better idea? Well, it was only 1 quart out of 10... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mike O'Malley wrote: That still didn't make me feel better when I put that quart of 60 weight oil in with the 15W50 when it was 15F outside. Man, did THAT ever take a long time to pour. In hindsight, maybe running a quart low for the 30 minute flight would have been a better idea? Well, it was only 1 quart out of 10... Oil sumps are sized to allow maximum duration flights at maximum oil burn without getting below the minimum quantity needed for safe operation. The IO-540 requires some tiny amount (2.75qt sticks in my mind, but I don't know if that includes the oil cooler and filter volume) but holds up to 12qt. It will blow out most anything above about 10qt. The Lycoming formula for maximum burn works out to be on the order of 1qt/hr. So if you get 6-7 hours of endurance that would allow you to start at 10-12qt and end up in a safe (but low!) range. So if your engine is one quart low, and it's not burning oil very fast, you probably don't need to add any. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
Did we win in Viet Nam? | Lisakbernacchia | Military Aviation | 89 | July 12th 04 06:03 AM |