![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted a new article on the theory of course deviations.
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john....asp#maccready or directly http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...viations_I.pdf (If the links don't work google john cochrane soaring and you'll find it under MacCready theory) I'll try to get some magazine to publish it. Comments and improvements welcome in the meantime. Yes, the daydreaming about soaring at the office season has begun John Cochrane BB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 6:19*pm, John Cochrane
wrote: I posted a new article on the theory of course deviations. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...ndex.asp#maccr... or directly http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...ocs/deviations... (If the links don't work google john cochrane soaring and you'll find it under MacCready theory) I'll try to get some magazine to publish it. Comments and improvements welcome in the meantime. Yes, the daydreaming about soaring at the office season has begun John Cochrane BB Well done! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Helge |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 22:19 30 September 2011, John Cochrane wrote:
I posted a new article on the theory of course deviations. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john....asp#maccready or directly http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...viations_I.pdf (If the links don't work google john cochrane soaring and you'll find it under MacCready theory) I'll try to get some magazine to publish it. Comments and improvements welcome in the meantime. Yes, the daydreaming about soaring at the office season has begun John Cochrane BB Brilliant! I knew I was doing it all wrong. Jim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the Dale Bush rule which states, "follow the Cu's, unless they
are way off course.....................then follow them anyway". Many times I have followed this rule and the reward was worth the risk. Cheers, JJ PS, Winter soaring isn't officially open until someone askes, "what's the best wax to use". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 6:29*am, JJ Sinclair wrote:
I like the Dale Bush rule which states, "follow the Cu's, unless they are way off course.....................then follow them anyway". Near the end of Sunship Game, there's that scene where Wally drives the ASW12 straight across the blue hole, and George takes his Cirrus along the cu around the edge. George later observed, "I thought it would be faster the long way around," and of course he was right. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
That was an awesome, awesome article. Thanks for taking the time to write that. I can't wait to get back in the air soon to try out some new ideas you wrote about. Scott Alexander |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 3:19*pm, John Cochrane
wrote: I posted a new article on the theory of course deviations. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...ndex.asp#maccr... or directly http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...ocs/deviations... (If the links don't work google john cochrane soaring and you'll find it under MacCready theory) I'll try to get some magazine to publish it. Comments and improvements welcome in the meantime. Yes, the daydreaming about soaring at the office season has begun John Cochrane BB Hello John: I am sure that you will have no difficulty finding ready publication for the paper, which in my opinion is the most important one you have written in this genre. I did a similar analysis several years back to quantify the key relationships. Some of this was shared in lectures given at SSA Conventions and EAS (formerly SHA) gatherings in the late 90's and early 2000's. Themes & phrases such as "When Slower is Faster" and "The Shortest 'Distance' Between Two Points is Convoluted"- not implying curved space/time and speaking metaphorically about "distance", of course. :-) Whereas MacCready theory as normally applied matches cruising speeds for straight glides in response to variable air masses, the approaches your paper explores introduce what is often a more useful variable- that of the varied course line. The other grand regime for piloting strategy in a discontinuous atmosphere is dynamic maneuvering. This places the focus on when, how quickly, how frequently and in what manner to make changes from one cruising speed or another and one heading to another, optimized to harvest energy or minimize it's losses. This strategy, for example, could allow for counterintuitive results when applied to Graph 1 of your paper with Pilot B arriving at his destination much more quickly than Pilot A when dynamic maneuvering is properly applied. This assumes that both pilots had a *reason* to make deviations where they did, according to your paper's impetus. As usual, you have written in a clear, concise, and cogent manner. Again, I think this is the most important and useful paper on soaring strategies that you have addressed and wish to thank you for taking to time to do it and sharing it as you have. Bravo, John! Best Regards, Gary Osoba |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 6:19*pm, John Cochrane
wrote: I posted a new article on the theory of course deviations. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...ndex.asp#maccr... or directly http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...ocs/deviations... (If the links don't work google john cochrane soaring and you'll find it under MacCready theory) I'll try to get some magazine to publish it. Comments and improvements welcome in the meantime. Yes, the daydreaming about soaring at the office season has begun John Cochrane BB Hats off to a most excellent work, Professor! The math and charts explain the concepts very well while sitting in the living room chair but I abandon them when I fly and tend to react a bit more intuitively, being a creature of habit as much as being a creature of reason. So, to develop good habits based on your analyses, are there "rehearsals" or "repetitive exercises" that pilots could take advantage of with a soaring simulator such as Condor? Engineering the soaring simulator for a series of such exercises, allowing the computer pilot to "retake the test", much like a student does when taking a multiple choice question on an exam, would really be fun and allow the principles, analyzed in your paper to become more intuitive. It would be interesting if such "exercises" could be added to the popular soaring simulators, much like examinations are given to students during their progression in their studies. Again, John, thank you for enlightening us. It was a joy to read! John Iacobucci |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very much enjoyed the article John.
I was surfing the online Soaring archive and came across another article that seems to address the same question. I haven't had a chance to read through it very thoroughly but SSA members or others with piles of Soaring Magazines laying around the house might check out the April 1981 edition. Article named "Course Deviations During Cross-Country Soaring" on Page 34. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Theory Exam | Alan Erskine[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 24th 08 02:55 PM |
The 777 crash - another theory | D Ramapriya | Piloting | 82 | January 25th 08 03:27 PM |
[Q] Strikefinder Theory of Operation | [email protected] | Home Built | 11 | September 19th 07 04:47 PM |
Theory Q: Cold Air, Lower Fuel Consumption? | john smith | Piloting | 30 | February 7th 07 04:14 PM |
so much for the big sky theory | soxinbox | Piloting | 5 | April 24th 06 08:07 PM |