![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Jodel has the pitot and static under the wing, it is built
according to plans and is just two pieces of aluminum tubing taped together which gets bumped fairly regularly, enough so that the previous owner built a little stick jig to adjust the bend. The front of the pitot is in line with the leading edge and when it rains it drips onto the pitot and with cold and wet it froze so I have been flying all winter with out an airspeed indicator, which is no problem but annoying,,,, Soooooo,,,, Why not install the pitot on the top of the rudder, the Jodel has a full flying rudder so it would always be pointing into the relative wind. Would this be enough of an advantage to offset the possible disadvantage of having the pitot in the prop wash? Also why not terminate the static line inside the wing, seems to me the air inside the wing would be relatively static. Your comments will be appreciated Thanks Ray Toews |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray wrote:
hy not install the pitot on the top of the rudder, the Jodel has a full flying rudder so it would always be pointing into the relative wind. Would this be enough of an advantage to offset the possible disadvantage of having the pitot in the prop wash? Run a seperate tube from your proposed location to a spot where you can Y the connection into your pitot system and have both lines exposed in the cockpit. Take the bird up and clamp off each in turn. If the airspeed changes dramatically, it may not be a good idea. Try the test in different flight regimes. Also why not terminate the static line inside the wing, seems to me the air inside the wing would be relatively static. It may be static but not at ambient pressure. The wing creates a slight vacuum behind it that will throw off your altitude measurements. -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray Toews wrote:
Why not install the pitot on the top of the rudder, the Jodel has a full flying rudder so it would always be pointing into the relative wind. Pitot tubes remain reasonably accurate within the alphas and betas encountered in normal flight. It is the static port that typically suffers accuracy in beta (with attendant ASI errors). Best to mount your pitot tube on the fixed airframe, not your full-flying rudder. Also why not terminate the static line inside the wing, seems to me the air inside the wing would be relatively static. Bad idea. The pressure inside your wing could vary widely with both airspeed and lift depending on where the various air gaps in your wing are. Use a well-placed static port or combo pitot-static head. -- UA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canard static port location | Paul Lee | Home Built | 1 | July 12th 03 02:55 AM |