![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The following is one (high end audio) manufacturer's warning
boilerplate: OK, You've been warned. This is a special experimental and/or developmental product that does not belong in the hands of an ordinary consumer. If you incur damage by ignoring this advice, just remember that you're dealing with Nevada corporations with no assets and no insurance. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Love it!... Yes, if more businesses structured this way ATLA would have
to lower it's annual membership dues to stay in business... True story: Stanley, is a person I know well enough to be privy to the inside information... He manufactures and markets custom audio products (primarily stereo amps, CB audio equipment, etc.) for retailers to sell under private labels... Got served with a subpoena with a claim for damages: severe injury, defective design, can't get it up anymore, loss of consortium, yadda, yadda, etc... Stanley advised the attorney and the judge that the product could not cause any injury unless horribly misused, that the offshore corporation which actually owned the product (legally he was merely an employee) had no insurance and no assets, and did not intend to appear for deposition or court... Got served multiple notices to court which 'the corporation' ignored... The judge awarded a default judgement of many hundreds of thousands of dollars (Stanley was told later that judge was literally in a rage over being ignored - no sense of humor, tsk, tsk).. At this point the plaintiff must have seen the handwriting on the wall because he bailed out, signing over his part of the 'windfall' to the attorney as payment of his fee... When the attorney tried to collect he was again informed that there were no assets... The attorney marched into the factory with a squad of deputy sheriffs and a paper stating that he owned the company... Fine, the production foreman said, smiled, put on his coat, and walked out... The majority of the workers took one look at the big city, weasel, lawyer - who was standing on a crate and yelling that they now worked for him - put on their coats and followed the foreman... Within hours the attorney found that the building was leased on a monthly basis (8 days left to the next lease payment, bubba!) - the machinery was leased (ditto) - the employees were from a national temp-labor company (ditto)... There was not a scrap of paper, blue print, production manual, order sheet, customer list, bills, etc., in the factory - all this was performed by a separate corporation and transmitted to work stations in the factory... When the foreman made a single phone call from his car as he left (computers were also leased), the internet connection hung up and the attorney was left with nothing but blank screens.. The machined/molded/stamped parts and circuit boards were made in Taiwan under an exclusive contract to a Bahamian Corporation and not available to anyone else... In the end all the plaintiff's attorney got was a bunch of bills and and a few dozen completed amplifiers; as the new owner under the law (heh heh) he inherited the assets (essentially zero) and the liabilities (lease and labor bills now due), and no way to manufacture new product... Within weeks Stanley had another factory up and running under another corporation, producing an identical line of amplifiers for his private label customers... Denny |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Denny wrote: Love it!... Yes, if more businesses structured this way ATLA would have to lower it's annual membership dues to stay in business... True story: (SNIP) Within weeks Stanley had another factory up and running under another corporation, producing an identical line of amplifiers for his private label customers... Denny Yea... its a shame that Cessna, Piper and Grumman dont operate that way, eh? (sardonic grin) Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course, a big ticket manufacturer is in a different ball game... Non
the less, if more businesse in the Untied States were structured so that there are no deep pockets to go after, there would be a marked diminishment in frivolous suits, including against the big guys... There are attorneys who make a career out of looking for deep pockets to sue - for a huge chunk of the judgement of course - knowing that they will lose 9 suits out of every 10... But, that tenth suit is like winning the lottery, Christmas, and having your rich uncle leave you everything, all rolled into one... If the first nine deep pockets aren't there the tenth suit is going to be fewer and farther between... Grin right back at ya... Denny |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Denny wrote: Of course, a big ticket manufacturer is in a different ball game... Non the less, if more businesse in the Untied States were structured so that there are no deep pockets to go after, there would be a marked diminishment in frivolous suits, including against the big guys... We're working on it. It's called "offshoring." George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the real world, Stanley would have lost all his private label customers as
soon as I filed a motion-under any of half a dozen pretexts-that allowed me to deposition his customers' employees. Once he (and more importantly, they) learned that the customers of any enterprise vaguely related to his previous business were going to have their employees subjected to interrogatories and depositions, he'd have to go to work at McDonalds. Judges really, really, really hate being ignored. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny" wrote in message ups.com... Of course, a big ticket manufacturer is in a different ball game... Non the less, if more businesse in the Untied States were structured so that there are no deep pockets to go after, there would be a marked diminishment in frivolous suits, including against the big guys... It could be solved just as easily by changing the law as it is in the U.K. Loser Pays. There are attorneys who make a career out of looking for deep pockets to sue - for a huge chunk of the judgement of course - knowing that they will lose 9 suits out of every 10... But, that tenth suit is like winning the lottery, Christmas, and having your rich uncle leave you everything, all rolled into one... If the first nine deep pockets aren't there the tenth suit is going to be fewer and farther between... Grin right back at ya... Denny California just had a ballot initiative to get rid of a law that the hippies in Sacramento wouldn't repeal. It allowed lawyers to on behalf of the public, while all they really did was line their own pockets. One firm, The Trevor Law Group was put out of business and it's lawyers disbarred because of the way they used this law to go after small businesses and threaten them with a law suit for some minor infraction or other. Is it any wonder so many politicians are lawyers and that the Trial Lawyers are such big contributors to the Democrats? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny" wrote in message oups.com... Love it!... Yes, if more businesses structured this way ATLA would have to lower it's annual membership dues to stay in business... True story: Stanley, is a person I know well enough to be privy to the inside information... He manufactures and markets custom audio products (primarily stereo amps, CB audio equipment, etc.) for retailers to sell under private labels... Got served with a subpoena with a claim for damages: severe injury, defective design, can't get it up anymore, loss of consortium, yadda, yadda, etc... Stanley advised the attorney and the judge that the product could not cause any injury unless horribly misused, that the offshore corporation which actually owned the product (legally he was merely an employee) had no insurance and no assets, and did not intend to appear for deposition or court... Got served multiple notices to court which 'the corporation' ignored... The judge awarded a default judgement of many hundreds of thousands of dollars (Stanley was told later that judge was literally in a rage over being ignored - no sense of humor, tsk, tsk).. At this point the plaintiff must have seen the handwriting on the wall because he bailed out, signing over his part of the 'windfall' to the attorney as payment of his fee... When the attorney tried to collect he was again informed that there were no assets... The attorney marched into the factory with a squad of deputy sheriffs and a paper stating that he owned the company... Fine, the production foreman said, smiled, put on his coat, and walked out... The majority of the workers took one look at the big city, weasel, lawyer - who was standing on a crate and yelling that they now worked for him - put on their coats and followed the foreman... Within hours the attorney found that the building was leased on a monthly basis (8 days left to the next lease payment, bubba!) - the machinery was leased (ditto) - the employees were from a national temp-labor company (ditto)... There was not a scrap of paper, blue print, production manual, order sheet, customer list, bills, etc., in the factory - all this was performed by a separate corporation and transmitted to work stations in the factory... When the foreman made a single phone call from his car as he left (computers were also leased), the internet connection hung up and the attorney was left with nothing but blank screens.. The machined/molded/stamped parts and circuit boards were made in Taiwan under an exclusive contract to a Bahamian Corporation and not available to anyone else... In the end all the plaintiff's attorney got was a bunch of bills and and a few dozen completed amplifiers; as the new owner under the law (heh heh) he inherited the assets (essentially zero) and the liabilities (lease and labor bills now due), and no way to manufacture new product... Within weeks Stanley had another factory up and running under another corporation, producing an identical line of amplifiers for his private label customers... Denny Another one for Snopes.com although not quite as well-concocted or believable. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another one for Snopes.com although not quite as well-concocted or
believable ************************************************** ********************* Interesting how the real world is never neat and perfect, eh... Cheers ... Denny |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Citizens for Honest Fighter Pilots Open Letter To Media | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 3 | September 18th 04 10:42 AM |
Citizens for Honest Fighter Pilots - Anyone in Lt Bush's Moody AFB UPT Class | Roger Helbig | Military Aviation | 5 | August 13th 04 05:15 PM |
Garmin GNS-530 for sale - Honest ! | Dan Karshin | Aviation Marketplace | 3 | July 19th 04 12:20 AM |
Attitude indicators | R&A Kyle | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | December 10th 03 06:56 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |