![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My strong belief is that most pilots fly for fun and because of that
they do not need fully certified flight recorders (where the price is at least 5 times higher). They would either like to improve their flying, share flights with other pilots, attend on-line competitions or simply record their flights. But from the beginning I have received several suggestions that device could be also certified as position recorder with NAC (National Air Sport Control). Several people helped me and now flyWithCE Flight Recorders are certified by NAC in Australia, Canada, Slovenia, United Kingdom and United States. The device could be then used as position recorder for Silver and Gold FAI badges. On 2nd and 3rd of March there was and IGC Plenary Meeting in South Africa where they decided that for Silver and Gold badges you do not need extra altitude recorder and that GPS altitude will be accepted. The difference with fully certified flight recorders is that pilot should account 100 meter altitude margin for possible GPS altitude error (for instance 1100 meter gain of height for Silver badge). The new rule will be applied when updated Sporting Code will be published. If you wild like to know more about flyWithCE Flight Recorder and flyWithCE Logbook software (which ships together with the device) please visit http://www.flywithce.com. Best regards Uros Podlogar www.flywithce.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 2:05*pm, urosp wrote:
My strong belief is that most pilots fly for fun and because of that they do not need fully certified flight recorders (where the price is at least 5 times higher). They would either like to improve their flying, share flights with other pilots, attend on-line competitions or simply record their flights. But from the beginning I have received several suggestions that device could be also certified as position recorder with NAC (National Air Sport Control). Several people helped me and now flyWithCE Flight Recorders are certified by NAC in Australia, Canada, Slovenia, United Kingdom and United States. The device could be then used as position recorder for Silver and Gold FAI badges. On 2nd and 3rd of March there was and IGC Plenary Meeting in South Africa where they decided that for Silver and Gold badges you do not need extra altitude recorder and that GPS altitude will be accepted. The difference with fully certified flight recorders is that pilot should account 100 meter altitude margin for possible GPS altitude error (for instance 1100 meter gain of height for Silver badge). The new rule will be applied when updated Sporting Code will be published. If you wild like to know more about flyWithCE Flight Recorder and flyWithCE Logbook software (which ships together with the device) please visithttp://www.flywithce.com. Best regards Uros Podlogarwww.flywithce.com Any idea when the Sporting Code will be printed, so that we can start, officially using the Position Recorders? Another question, in the above post, it says that you might want to use an 1,100 meter gain for the Silver Badge to make sure for GPS errors; how is the SSA Badge Dude going to know what the "real" altitude is, if the only reported data will be the GPS altitude?? Fred Blair |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 8:54*pm, fredblair wrote:
On Mar 8, 2:05*pm, urosp wrote: My strong belief is that most pilots fly for fun and because of that they do not need fully certified flight recorders (where the price is at least 5 times higher). They would either like to improve their flying, share flights with other pilots, attend on-line competitions or simply record their flights. But from the beginning I have received several suggestions that device could be also certified as position recorder with NAC (National Air Sport Control). Several people helped me and now flyWithCE Flight Recorders are certified by NAC in Australia, Canada, Slovenia, United Kingdom and United States. The device could be then used as position recorder for Silver and Gold FAI badges. On 2nd and 3rd of March there was and IGC Plenary Meeting in South Africa where they decided that for Silver and Gold badges you do not need extra altitude recorder and that GPS altitude will be accepted. The difference with fully certified flight recorders is that pilot should account 100 meter altitude margin for possible GPS altitude error (for instance 1100 meter gain of height for Silver badge). The new rule will be applied when updated Sporting Code will be published. If you wild like to know more about flyWithCE Flight Recorder and flyWithCE Logbook software (which ships together with the device) please visithttp://www.flywithce.com. Best regards Uros Podlogarwww.flywithce.com Any idea when the Sporting Code will be printed, so that we can start, officially using the Position Recorders? Another question, in the above post, it says that you might want to use an 1,100 meter gain for the Silver Badge to make sure for GPS errors; how is the SSA Badge Dude going to know what the "real" altitude is, if the only reported data will be the GPS altitude?? Fred Blair You almost start to feel like glider pilots are a bunch of cheaters that will stop at nothing to win or get a badge: they need an AH in their panels so they can cloud fly, or they use secret apps on their I- phones that they'll load once airborne.........now they're gonna jigger their GPS trace to get extra altitude................jeez, I'm glad I'm just a lowly blue circle OLC pilot! Brad |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 10:15*pm, Brad wrote:
On Mar 9, 8:54*pm, fredblair wrote: On Mar 8, 2:05*pm, urosp wrote: My strong belief is that most pilots fly for fun and because of that they do not need fully certified flight recorders (where the price is at least 5 times higher). They would either like to improve their flying, share flights with other pilots, attend on-line competitions or simply record their flights. But from the beginning I have received several suggestions that device could be also certified as position recorder with NAC (National Air Sport Control). Several people helped me and now flyWithCE Flight Recorders are certified by NAC in Australia, Canada, Slovenia, United Kingdom and United States. The device could be then used as position recorder for Silver and Gold FAI badges. On 2nd and 3rd of March there was and IGC Plenary Meeting in South Africa where they decided that for Silver and Gold badges you do not need extra altitude recorder and that GPS altitude will be accepted. The difference with fully certified flight recorders is that pilot should account 100 meter altitude margin for possible GPS altitude error (for instance 1100 meter gain of height for Silver badge). The new rule will be applied when updated Sporting Code will be published. If you wild like to know more about flyWithCE Flight Recorder and flyWithCE Logbook software (which ships together with the device) please visithttp://www.flywithce.com. Best regards Uros Podlogarwww.flywithce.com Any idea when the Sporting Code will be printed, so that we can start, officially using the Position Recorders? Another question, in the above post, it says that you might want to use an 1,100 meter gain for the Silver Badge to make sure for GPS errors; how is the SSA Badge Dude going to know what the "real" altitude is, if the only reported data will be the GPS altitude?? Fred Blair You almost start to feel like glider pilots are a bunch of cheaters that will stop at nothing to win or get a badge: they need an AH in their panels so they can cloud fly, or they use secret apps on their I- phones that they'll load once airborne.........now they're gonna jigger their GPS trace to get extra altitude................jeez, I'm glad I'm just a lowly blue circle OLC pilot! Brad The extra 100 meters allows for the GPS error compared to pressure altitude. I do not think it has anything to do with trust. My GPS alt is always reading higher than my pressure altitude when both are are shown in XCSOAR. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 9:21*pm, Mike C wrote:
On Mar 9, 10:15*pm, Brad wrote: On Mar 9, 8:54*pm, fredblair wrote: On Mar 8, 2:05*pm, urosp wrote: My strong belief is that most pilots fly for fun and because of that they do not need fully certified flight recorders (where the price is at least 5 times higher). They would either like to improve their flying, share flights with other pilots, attend on-line competitions or simply record their flights. But from the beginning I have received several suggestions that device could be also certified as position recorder with NAC (National Air Sport Control). Several people helped me and now flyWithCE Flight Recorders are certified by NAC in Australia, Canada, Slovenia, United Kingdom and United States. The device could be then used as position recorder for Silver and Gold FAI badges. On 2nd and 3rd of March there was and IGC Plenary Meeting in South Africa where they decided that for Silver and Gold badges you do not need extra altitude recorder and that GPS altitude will be accepted.. The difference with fully certified flight recorders is that pilot should account 100 meter altitude margin for possible GPS altitude error (for instance 1100 meter gain of height for Silver badge). The new rule will be applied when updated Sporting Code will be published. If you wild like to know more about flyWithCE Flight Recorder and flyWithCE Logbook software (which ships together with the device) please visithttp://www.flywithce.com. Best regards Uros Podlogarwww.flywithce.com Any idea when the Sporting Code will be printed, so that we can start, officially using the Position Recorders? Another question, in the above post, it says that you might want to use an 1,100 meter gain for the Silver Badge to make sure for GPS errors; how is the SSA Badge Dude going to know what the "real" altitude is, if the only reported data will be the GPS altitude?? Fred Blair You almost start to feel like glider pilots are a bunch of cheaters that will stop at nothing to win or get a badge: they need an AH in their panels so they can cloud fly, or they use secret apps on their I- phones that they'll load once airborne.........now they're gonna jigger their GPS trace to get extra altitude................jeez, I'm glad I'm just a lowly blue circle OLC pilot! Brad The extra 100 meters allows for the GPS error compared to pressure altitude. I do not think it has anything to do with trust. My GPS alt is always reading higher than my pressure altitude when both are are shown in XCSOAR. GPS altitude errors are generally small compared to pressure altimetry errors, the extra 100 meters is actually intended to make up for the latter. We measure altitude according to an abstract pressure/ altitude model based on a specific atmospheric temperature gradient defined by the International Standard Atmosphere, in reality the real world atmosphere *never* matches the model. On cold days pressure altimeters typically read higher than the actual elevation, on hot days they read lower, and the error generally increases with increasing altitude... Marc |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 9:15*pm, Brad wrote:
You almost start to feel like glider pilots are a bunch of cheaters that will stop at nothing to win or get a badge: they need an AH in their panels so they can cloud fly, or they use secret apps on their I- phones that they'll load once airborne.........now they're gonna jigger their GPS trace to get extra altitude................jeez, I'm glad I'm just a lowly blue circle OLC pilot! Well, how would you suggest we deal with the fact that a 1000 meter gain measured by the GPS may physically place the glider either higher or lower than a 1000 meter gain measured by a pressure altimeter on the same day? We traditionally measured height and gain by using pressure differentials mapped to an abstract model of the atmosphere, allowing both methods of measurement requires some sort of compromise... Marc |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 9:40*pm, Marc wrote:
On Mar 9, 9:15*pm, Brad wrote: You almost start to feel like glider pilots are a bunch of cheaters that will stop at nothing to win or get a badge: they need an AH in their panels so they can cloud fly, or they use secret apps on their I- phones that they'll load once airborne.........now they're gonna jigger their GPS trace to get extra altitude................jeez, I'm glad I'm just a lowly blue circle OLC pilot! Well, how would you suggest we deal with the fact that a 1000 meter gain measured by the GPS may physically place the glider either higher or lower than a 1000 meter gain measured by a pressure altimeter on the same day? *We traditionally measured height and gain by using pressure differentials mapped to an abstract model of the atmosphere, allowing both methods of measurement requires some sort of compromise... Marc Marc, It was a tongue in cheek comment...........sorry......... ![]() Brad |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 10:02*pm, Brad wrote:
Well, how would you suggest we deal with the fact that a 1000 meter gain measured by the GPS may physically place the glider either higher or lower than a 1000 meter gain measured by a pressure altimeter on the same day? *We traditionally measured height and gain by using pressure differentials mapped to an abstract model of the atmosphere, allowing both methods of measurement requires some sort of compromise... Marc Marc, It was a tongue in cheek comment...........sorry......... ![]() You, I, and others may know that, but not everyone is in on the joke. You really want to risk starting another 200 message thread? ;^) Marc |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 10, 12:15*am, Brad wrote:
On Mar 9, 8:54*pm, fredblair wrote: On Mar 8, 2:05*pm, urosp wrote: My strong belief is that most pilots fly for fun and because of that they do not need fully certified flight recorders (where the price is at least 5 times higher). They would either like to improve their flying, share flights with other pilots, attend on-line competitions or simply record their flights. But from the beginning I have received several suggestions that device could be also certified as position recorder with NAC (National Air Sport Control). Several people helped me and now flyWithCE Flight Recorders are certified by NAC in Australia, Canada, Slovenia, United Kingdom and United States. The device could be then used as position recorder for Silver and Gold FAI badges. On 2nd and 3rd of March there was and IGC Plenary Meeting in South Africa where they decided that for Silver and Gold badges you do not need extra altitude recorder and that GPS altitude will be accepted. The difference with fully certified flight recorders is that pilot should account 100 meter altitude margin for possible GPS altitude error (for instance 1100 meter gain of height for Silver badge). The new rule will be applied when updated Sporting Code will be published. If you wild like to know more about flyWithCE Flight Recorder and flyWithCE Logbook software (which ships together with the device) please visithttp://www.flywithce.com. Best regards Uros Podlogarwww.flywithce.com Any idea when the Sporting Code will be printed, so that we can start, officially using the Position Recorders? Another question, in the above post, it says that you might want to use an 1,100 meter gain for the Silver Badge to make sure for GPS errors; how is the SSA Badge Dude going to know what the "real" altitude is, if the only reported data will be the GPS altitude?? Fred Blair You almost start to feel like glider pilots are a bunch of cheaters that will stop at nothing to win or get a badge: they need an AH in their panels so they can cloud fly, or they use secret apps on their I- phones that they'll load once airborne.........now they're gonna jigger their GPS trace to get extra altitude................jeez, I'm glad I'm just a lowly blue circle OLC pilot! Brad My question had nothing to do with 'cheating'. I am an Instructor and I will be responsible for teaching members how to properly use these new devices to obtain their badges. My question was just a question of fact: if the GPS altitude shown in the IGC file is going to be accepted as the altitude of the flight, then why do we worry about pressure altitude? I thought the whole idea of approving the 'position recorders' was to eliminate the need for the more expensive units that include a calibrated pressure sensor. A couple of posts after this, makes a statement that we will still need pressure altitude, since that is what is in Sporting Code 3. Isn't the new Sporting Code going to be re-written to eliminate the pressure altitude requirement. Fred |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 10, 10:52*am, fredblair wrote:
My question had nothing to do with 'cheating'. *I am an Instructor and I will be responsible for teaching members how to properly use these new devices to obtain their badges. *My question was just a question of fact: if the GPS altitude shown in the IGC file is going to be accepted as the altitude of the flight, then why do we worry about pressure altitude? *I thought the whole idea of approving the 'position recorders' was to eliminate the need for the more expensive units that include a calibrated pressure sensor. A couple of posts after this, makes a statement that we will still need pressure altitude, since that is what is in Sporting Code 3. Isn't the new Sporting Code going to be re-written to eliminate the pressure altitude requirement. The Sporting Code currently in effect through September 30, 2012 still requires that pressure altitude evidence be provided along with GPS- derived position data for Silver and Gold badges. If a badge flight is to be flown using a local NAC approved "position recorder" which does not record pressure altitude, then a barograph must also be carried, and both the GPS flight data and the barograph trace must be submitted for any badge legs. As of October 1, 2012, IGC flight data from an approved position recorder containing GPS position data and GPS altitude will be all that is required for these badge legs, no more barograph. Again, due to concerns that during a normal summer soaring day a gain of height measured by pressure altitude requires climbing to a higher actual elevation, than the (more accurate) GPS altitude measurement, an extra margin was added in an effort to equalize things. So, as of October 1, a climb to 1100M (as measured by GPS) will suffice for claiming Silver altitude using a GPS-only position recorder, no need to worry about pressure altitude. 1000M (as measured by pressure altitude) will continue to be acceptable when using an approved flight recorder, a position recorder which records pressure altitude, or a position record and barograph. I know this is a bit confusing, but believe me, getting Silver and Gold badges will be easier and cheaper from October on... Marc |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flyWithCE tip #2: flyWithCE Flight Recorder and OLC | urosp | Soaring | 0 | February 16th 11 05:28 PM |
flyWithCE tip #1: How can you view flights in flyWithCE Logbook? | urosp | Soaring | 0 | February 11th 11 06:39 AM |
flyWithCE Flight Recorder | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 4 | November 13th 09 07:10 PM |
FlyWithCe recorder woes | Ferstlesque | Soaring | 3 | June 29th 09 06:23 AM |
New flight recorder - flyWithCE Flight Recorder | uros | Soaring | 12 | May 5th 09 08:31 PM |