![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Being newly licenced (yesterday), I've started thinking about the type
of VFR flight-planning I'll do in the real, post-student world, and what tools I'll use. As a student, of course, I did everything by hand, and meticulously, and eschewed GPS navigation as well. Some of my observations from my brief XC experience thus far: 1) Winds aloft forecasts are never right- usually not close. 2) There's no need to produce a nav log, etc. with checkpoints when the route is familiar. So, for a route that is now familiar to me- say, Timmmerman (MWC) to Appleton (ATW) (about 75nm), of course I get a briefing, and check the winds aloft, but I'm not going to produce a nav log. I'm going to fly by pilotage with my GPS to back me up and with a VOR receiver to back that up. And, of course, if I encounter particularly unexpected weather, I'm going to turn back. For new routes, I am going to produce a nav log, knowing full well that my heading will not likely match the precomputed values due to differing winds aloft. No matter. But, of course, for such flights, I'm not going to be doing things the old-fashioned way anymore. I want some good software to make it easy. So, I think I have two questions: 1) Does this make sense? and 2) What's the best flight-planning software out there? I've used AOPA's tool and I like it, but I don't really know what's out there (and yeah I can do a google search but then you don't know if you're hearing about the latest & greatest). I do have a Palm 5 device so PC software that has a Palm component too would be a plus. ~Paul P.S. Hope this isn't too much of a "newbie" post for this forum. Thought it was more appropriate here than over at .student. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:43:42 GMT, Paul Folbrecht
wrote: So, I think I have two questions: 1) Does this make sense? and 2) What's the best flight-planning software out there? I've used AOPA's tool and I like it, but I don't really know what's out there (and yeah I can do a google search but then you don't know if you're hearing about the latest & greatest). I do have a Palm 5 device so PC software that has a Palm component too would be a plus. I suggest you get familiar with DUATS (www.duats.com). For the Palm I recommend AOPA eAFD for airport data, and Copilot. Copilot will not provide automatic routing, but it is a good method of putting together route information when you don't have access to the internet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AOPA's tool is a crippled form of FliteStar, which is arguably the most
complete package available even though it does not download anything to your handheld. It will download routes to your GPS. Flitesoft also works well, although the routing routines are not as sophisticated as those in FliteStar. PocketFMS is shareware. www.pocketfms.com. It is still a little rough around the edges, but it does work with both your PC and your handheld. The latest version appears to have added some more color graphics. There is no Palm version available at the moment. ControlVision's software works on your handheld only, but is not Palm compatible. My personal opinion is that having to fly without your handheld is like having to hike without your bathtub. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heh. Point taken. Do it on the PC at home and there's no real need for
the Palm. My hiking did become way more enjoyable when I stopped lugging the damn bathtub everywhere. I even leave the accordian behind most trips now. My personal opinion is that having to fly without your handheld is like having to hike without your bathtub. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Paul Folbrecht said:
Heh. Point taken. Do it on the PC at home and there's no real need for the Palm. Ok, just one small plug for CoPilot (see http://xcski.com/~ptomblin/CoPilot/), even though the other posters have been doing it for me. A few months ago I was coming back from Muskegeon. That's a long trip for me, and since I'm flying club planes I haven't "calibrated" the fuel flow exactly. So I like get on the ground after 3.5 hours, even though theoretically I could probably get 4.5 hours out of the tanks. I'd done the flight plan earlier, and put all the appropriate waypoints into CoPilot. With no wind, I would be nudging my comfort zone, so I made sure I had the Buffalo approach plates on my knee board on top of the Rochester ones, and figured I might have to make a refueling stop in Buffalo. That morning, I called up flight service from my motel room, and got the weather and winds aloft. Plugging the winds aloft into CoPilot, and I could see that it would still be 3.6 hours to Rochester, so I filed to Buffalo. All the time aloft, I was watching the ETAs in CoPilot and comparing them to reality, and found I was getting better winds than forecast. I recalculated the winds, found I could make it to Rochester, so I asked ATC for a diversion to Rochester, and went home. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Usenet is a co-operative venture, backed by nasty people - follow the standards. -- Chris Rovers |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to do wonderful flight-plans when I was a student, with
waypoints every few miles, and winds aloft, and ground speeds, and fuel consumption, and times to the nearest minute, and so on. It's a useful skill, because it crops up on the FAA written tests. Since getting my PPL, I haven't done it once (well, except for my Instrument written). I use DUATS all the time. -- winds aloft forecasts are, as you note, pretty much useless -- my plane can fly for 6.3 hours with full tanks. The longest I've done is about 4.5, and I was VERY glad to land -- if I'm in VMC, I do check my route by pilotage regardless of my principal navigation means (which is GPS), but I just figure it out as I go with the sectional on my lap - actually that's one of the most enjoyable bits of xc flying, for me John "Paul Folbrecht" wrote in message ink.net... Being newly licenced (yesterday), I've started thinking about the type of VFR flight-planning I'll do in the real, post-student world, and what tools I'll use. As a student, of course, I did everything by hand, and meticulously, and eschewed GPS navigation as well. Some of my observations from my brief XC experience thus far: 1) Winds aloft forecasts are never right- usually not close. 2) There's no need to produce a nav log, etc. with checkpoints when the route is familiar. So, for a route that is now familiar to me- say, Timmmerman (MWC) to Appleton (ATW) (about 75nm), of course I get a briefing, and check the winds aloft, but I'm not going to produce a nav log. I'm going to fly by pilotage with my GPS to back me up and with a VOR receiver to back that up. And, of course, if I encounter particularly unexpected weather, I'm going to turn back. For new routes, I am going to produce a nav log, knowing full well that my heading will not likely match the precomputed values due to differing winds aloft. No matter. But, of course, for such flights, I'm not going to be doing things the old-fashioned way anymore. I want some good software to make it easy. So, I think I have two questions: 1) Does this make sense? and 2) What's the best flight-planning software out there? I've used AOPA's tool and I like it, but I don't really know what's out there (and yeah I can do a google search but then you don't know if you're hearing about the latest & greatest). I do have a Palm 5 device so PC software that has a Palm component too would be a plus. ~Paul P.S. Hope this isn't too much of a "newbie" post for this forum. Thought it was more appropriate here than over at .student. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Several points I see here...
A couple of months ago one of the GA magazines did an article about what the FAA regs required as far as the location of a pilot's certificate. From what I remember, the regs previously required the certificate be on the pilots person (billfold, etc). Again, from what I remember, it is now permissible to have the certificate in the aircraft (flight bag, etc). The next point is: it's 2003 and there is a terrorist under every rock. Which means you are dealing with some non-FAA regulations on airport property. I would not be surprised if a cop pulled over someone driving around a non-terminal area and asking for some verifiable reason for the person being there. Which creates a problem: as is noted elsewhere, an A & P must be posted in the area where the holder performs most of his/her work. And it would not be unreasonable for a pilot to leave his flight bag, containing his certificate, in the airplane when he leaves the airport to conduct business, go shopping, whatever (Hey, Deputy Dawg, this guy is trying to convince me you can make business trips in those little Piper Cub airplanes!). I tend to take the line of least resistance: I've found that I can frequently spend 15 seconds complying with an idiotic regulation/request, or I can spend 30 minutes arguing about it. If it's not a huge civil liberties issue, I'll comply with the idiotic request and be on my way. Consequently, it would seem to be a reasonable idea to make a copy of my certificate and stick it in my billfold/purse. I doubt if it would satisfy the FAA, but for your average Bozo cop out there cruising the airport hoping to stop a car with Osama in it, it would probably be satisfactory. Just an opinion... "Paul Folbrecht" wrote in message ink.net... Being newly licenced (yesterday), I've started thinking about the type of VFR flight-planning I'll do in the real, post-student world, and what tools I'll use. As a student, of course, I did everything by hand, and meticulously, and eschewed GPS navigation as well. Some of my observations from my brief XC experience thus far: 1) Winds aloft forecasts are never right- usually not close. 2) There's no need to produce a nav log, etc. with checkpoints when the route is familiar. So, for a route that is now familiar to me- say, Timmmerman (MWC) to Appleton (ATW) (about 75nm), of course I get a briefing, and check the winds aloft, but I'm not going to produce a nav log. I'm going to fly by pilotage with my GPS to back me up and with a VOR receiver to back that up. And, of course, if I encounter particularly unexpected weather, I'm going to turn back. For new routes, I am going to produce a nav log, knowing full well that my heading will not likely match the precomputed values due to differing winds aloft. No matter. But, of course, for such flights, I'm not going to be doing things the old-fashioned way anymore. I want some good software to make it easy. So, I think I have two questions: 1) Does this make sense? and 2) What's the best flight-planning software out there? I've used AOPA's tool and I like it, but I don't really know what's out there (and yeah I can do a google search but then you don't know if you're hearing about the latest & greatest). I do have a Palm 5 device so PC software that has a Palm component too would be a plus. ~Paul P.S. Hope this isn't too much of a "newbie" post for this forum. Thought it was more appropriate here than over at .student. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
The next point is: it's 2003 and there is a terrorist under every rock. So what about 2004? ![]() To the original poster: DUATS gives me every thing I could need. Aeroplanner.com give me everything I need and then some with the added benefit of storing frequent routes. When I'm ready to fly a particular route, I simply load up Aeroplanner and update the route for new weather the print the thing. -- Jim Fisher |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... | | The next point is: it's 2003 and I wish people would not say this. While your own post was pretty good, there is an incredible amount of silliness that is being justified just because "it is 2003" (or 4, or whatever). Whenever someone starts out this way I am 99% certain that some wretched, silly statement is about to follow. Yours was an exception, but a rare one. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Folbrecht wrote:
Being newly licenced (yesterday), I've started thinking about the type of VFR flight-planning I'll do in the real, post-student world, and what tools I'll use. [zip] So, I think I have two questions: 1) Does this make sense? and 2) What's the best flight-planning software out there? I've used AOPA's tool and I like it, but I don't really know what's out there (and yeah I can do a google search but then you don't know if you're hearing about the latest & greatest). I do have a Palm 5 device so PC software that has a Palm component too would be a plus. Paul, WingX from http://www.hiltonsoftware.com runs on a Pocket PC and let's you quickly do route planning with wind calculations, it'll do W&B and a whole lot more including having Parts 1, 61, 91, 119, and 141 of the FARs right on your PDA. It's pretty cool if I say so myself (ahem...) Disclaimer: Should be obvious. ![]() Try it, you'll like it - it's free to download and try. Hilton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Want simple flight planning software | marc | Home Built | 13 | December 20th 04 04:36 AM |
Do you flight plan? | Nasir | Piloting | 120 | December 16th 03 07:15 PM |
Flight Simulator for Real Pilots | Charles Talleyrand | Piloting | 29 | November 29th 03 03:10 PM |
Flight Planning software | PA28Rdrvr | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 12th 03 12:18 AM |