![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought this was a joke when I first read this, from the AOPA win a twin
sweepstakes official rules: "...In compliance with Canadian law, if winner is a Canadian resident, he or she must first correctly answer a mathematical skill-testing question before the prize will be awarded. If the potential winner is unable to correctly answer the question, AOPA will select an alternate winner." Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is this to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't say "officially" where this law came from but any/all "free" or
giveaway prizes in Canada have this silly attachment to them. Almost always the question is mah related and looks like. What is 33 x 3 /9 = In this case, 11. also i've noticed o nthese that the BEDMAS principles generally do not apply. I've seen questions with () in them but the answer is only "correct" if you do the math in sequence and ignore the BEDMAS rules. I'm sure someone else can give you more details eh? ![]() "Brad Z" wrote in message news:wrwRb.125923$Rc4.979896@attbi_s54... I thought this was a joke when I first read this, from the AOPA win a twin sweepstakes official rules: "...In compliance with Canadian law, if winner is a Canadian resident, he or she must first correctly answer a mathematical skill-testing question before the prize will be awarded. If the potential winner is unable to correctly answer the question, AOPA will select an alternate winner." Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is this to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Brad Z wrote: Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is this to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft? Sounds like a poorly worded law against games of chance. That type of law is the reason behind some of the things you have to do to enter sweepstakes like the Publisher's Clearing House. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article wrwRb.125923$Rc4.979896@attbi_s54, Brad Z wrote:
Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is this to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft? It's a lot easier to register your sweepstakes as a game of skill than a game of chance. So they make it into a game of skill by asking a mathematical question. I think that there has to be at least 3 operations in the question for it to be skill-testing. Someone else wrote something about Canadians all carrying around calculators all the time (presumably on the off chance that we'll win a sweepstakes?). I certainly don't know anyone who does.. - awh |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |