![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Washington State Department of Transportation
Aviation News Service March 3, 2004 Bad Weather Hampers Search for Missing Aircraft BREMERTON - Washington Air Search and Rescue and Civil Air Patrol volunteers continue in the search today for a missing 1948 Cessna 170 aircraft, carrying pilot David Verstrate and passenger Harold Bennett, at the Bremerton National Airport. The aircraft was reported missing on Sunday evening when it had failed to return from a private strip in Diamond Point to Auburn. Tom Peterson, WSDOT Air Search and Rescue Coordinator, commented that gusty winds and low ceilings are hampering today's search efforts. Two aircraft are searching the air while three remain on the ground. Peterson said that forecasts indicate better weather later this afternoon, around 3pm. Peterson expects about 10 more aircraft to join in the search when the weather improves. Verstrate, an experienced pilot, departed from Auburn on Sunday afternoon and landed at Diamond Point, near Sequim, with Bennett. A witness reports seeing the Cessna single-engine plane, N2534V, leave Diamond Point around 4pm on Sunday. Yesterday's search effort included 21 aircraft, 68 volunteers and 92 hours of flying time. Family members have gathered at the search site and expressed their appreciation for the volunteer search effort. Peterson described yesterday's mission as "very productive." He adds, "We accomplished a lot in the time we had - thanks to the volunteers. As soon as the weather permits today, we will be back up there in full force working just as hard." Yesterday was a bright sunny day. I spent most of the day teaching ground reference maneuvers to student pilots, not knowing what was going on. These search planes were everywhere. I had to really watch out for them. Unfortunately, the plane is still missing. The terrain between Sequim and Auburn is heavily forested, rugged and mountainous, and broken up by numerous inlets and fjords on Puget Sound. There are also a lot of lakes in the region. Some areas are still covered in snow. Still, the area also has a lot of people living in it. You would think someone would have seen something. I don't know if this plane had an ELT or not, but nothing has been picked up. Aircraft from the Washington State Pilots Association, the Civil Air Patrol, and the Coast Guard have been participating in the search. The search has been very dangerous, conducted at extremely low level in bad weather. There are a lot of uncharted power lines, towers, and other obstructions. -- Christopher J. Campbell World Famous Flight Instructor Port Orchard, WA If you go around beating the Bush, don't complain if you rile the animals. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... [...] The terrain between Sequim and Auburn is heavily forested, rugged and mountainous, and broken up by numerous inlets and fjords on Puget Sound. There are also a lot of lakes in the region. Some areas are still covered in snow. Still, the area also has a lot of people living in it. You would think someone would have seen something. While it's true that there are mountains and forests between Sequim and Auburn, I would expect most pilots flying that route to stay over the better-populated low-lands. Especially given the hassle of trying to climb up over the mountains right after taking off from Sequim in a Cessna 170. I think it's unlikely that in yesterday's weather, assuming the pilot made no diversion (and in that case, the search is probably hopeless), the route would have been over the mountains, or over any lakes. On the other hand, a popular route between the two airports might well be to fly down Hood Canal, cut over to Tacoma, and then back up the valley to Auburn. The wife was shown on the evening news last night saying that her husband was in the habit of "skimming the water" while flying that route. It wouldn't surprise me to find out he sunk his airplane, either by accidently flying too low or by having a sudden engine failure and no where to glide to. With the wind and the rain today, I think there's a decent chance that the main problem is no one's been able to see the oil slick on the water from the crash. Obviously it's a little early to be making judgments about what actually happened, but so far it sounds like a pilot who insisted on taking unnecessary risks had those risks finally catch up with him. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You never know he and the passenger could still be alive there is a chance.
Think positive! "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... [...] The terrain between Sequim and Auburn is heavily forested, rugged and mountainous, and broken up by numerous inlets and fjords on Puget Sound. There are also a lot of lakes in the region. Some areas are still covered in snow. Still, the area also has a lot of people living in it. You would think someone would have seen something. While it's true that there are mountains and forests between Sequim and Auburn, I would expect most pilots flying that route to stay over the better-populated low-lands. Especially given the hassle of trying to climb up over the mountains right after taking off from Sequim in a Cessna 170. I think it's unlikely that in yesterday's weather, assuming the pilot made no diversion (and in that case, the search is probably hopeless), the route would have been over the mountains, or over any lakes. On the other hand, a popular route between the two airports might well be to fly down Hood Canal, cut over to Tacoma, and then back up the valley to Auburn. The wife was shown on the evening news last night saying that her husband was in the habit of "skimming the water" while flying that route. It wouldn't surprise me to find out he sunk his airplane, either by accidently flying too low or by having a sudden engine failure and no where to glide to. With the wind and the rain today, I think there's a decent chance that the main problem is no one's been able to see the oil slick on the water from the crash. Obviously it's a little early to be making judgments about what actually happened, but so far it sounds like a pilot who insisted on taking unnecessary risks had those risks finally catch up with him. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | July 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | October 2nd 03 12:17 AM |
A Good Story | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 15 | September 3rd 03 03:00 PM |