![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to see how many points the motorglider guys would end up scoring if their motor was rendered unavailable after launch. A friend of mine couldn't get his motor started one day, so he took an aero tow, and his flying was much different that day. It's just not the same when you know you can crank up that iron thermal an motor home any time you want. It's definitely not a level playing field.
Boggs |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 29, 8:30*am, Waveguru wrote:
I would like to see how many points the motorglider guys would end up scoring if their motor was rendered unavailable after launch. * A friend of mine couldn't get his motor started one day, so he took an aero tow, and his flying was much different that day. *It's just not the same when you know you can crank up that iron thermal an motor home any time you want. It's definitely not a level playing field. Boggs Boy, there's a troll if I ever heard one. I disagree. That's as much of a nibble as you're going to get out of me. You should know better Gary. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 29, 2013 10:13:48 AM UTC-5, 4Z wrote:
On Apr 29, 8:30*am, Waveguru wrote: I would like to see how many points the motorglider guys would end up scoring if their motor was rendered unavailable after launch. * A friend of mine couldn't get his motor started one day, so he took an aero tow, and his flying was much different that day. *It's just not the same when you know you can crank up that iron thermal an motor home any time you want. It's definitely not a level playing field. Boggs Boy, there's a troll if I ever heard one. I disagree. That's as much of a nibble as you're going to get out of me.. You should know better Gary. probably no more of an advantage than a pilot who has a crew ready and willing to come get them if they land out. perhaps OLC needs a "crewless" category ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 29, 2013 11:25:14 AM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
On Monday, April 29, 2013 10:13:48 AM UTC-5, 4Z wrote: On Apr 29, 8:30*am, Waveguru wrote: I would like to see how many points the motorglider guys would end up scoring if their motor was rendered unavailable after launch. * A friend of mine couldn't get his motor started one day, so he took an aero tow, and his flying was much different that day. *It's just not the same when you know you can crank up that iron thermal an motor home any time you want. It's definitely not a level playing field. Boggs Boy, there's a troll if I ever heard one. I disagree. That's as much of a nibble as you're going to get out of me. You should know better Gary. probably no more of an advantage than a pilot who has a crew ready and willing to come get them if they land out. perhaps OLC needs a "crewless" category ![]() I owned a PIK20E for a few years. I took huge risks that I wouldn't have without the motor (as far as landing out, and some stupid ones also). I learned more about XC soaring than I did in 20 years. You have to commit to a airport or a good field at a higher altitude than without a motor, and the glider climbed slow in weak conditions. I definitely fly more conservative (as far as risking landing out) without a motor. In competition a motor is probably not as much of an advantage because of the higher altitude commitment for landing out. But, for recreational flying it sure was nice. Ed |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I was hoping to start a discussion. If that's trolling, then I guess I'm guilty as charged. I do think it is not even close to the same thing psychologically. There is a BIG difference between cranking up the motor, as opposed to landing In a field, and having a crew come and get you. Landing out is a much bigger deterrent, and keeps us from stretching as far as we might if we had a motor. I saw it clearly in my buddy that couldn't get his motor to start, and had to take a tow. And how many of us fly with a "crew" waiting to come and get us? I think I would look forward to landing out if I had Ramy's beautiful wife to come and get me!...
Flame retardant ready... Boggs |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 29, 2013 9:30:09 AM UTC-5, Waveguru wrote:
I would like to see how many points the motorglider guys would end up scoring if their motor was rendered unavailable after launch. Blah blah blah. It's definitely not a level playing field. Boggs You are right, Gary. The playing field isn't level. And my flights in mid-west thermals can't compete on a level playing field with Ely thermals, Minden Wave Days, Parowan thermal days, or east coast ridge days, either. Now, when I go to Moriarty... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/29/2013 12:28 PM, Steve Leonard wrote:
On Monday, April 29, 2013 9:30:09 AM UTC-5, Waveguru wrote: I would like to see how many points the motorglider guys would end up scoring if their motor was rendered unavailable after launch. Blah blah blah. It's definitely not a level playing field. Boggs You are right, Gary. The playing field isn't level. And my flights in mid-west thermals can't compete on a level playing field with Ely thermals, Minden Wave Days, Parowan thermal days, or east coast ridge days, either It's true that having an easy retrieve, whether it's by an eager crew person or a motor, will make a pilot bolder. But the performance of the glider will also change how you fly. For example, would a pilot's flying change if he was plucked from a Blanik and dropped into an ASG 29? Or from Nimbus 4 into a 1-26? Oh, you betcha! And how about launch methods? Would what the pilot could achieve change if he had aero-tows available instead of a 1000' car launch? Suppose the pilot is retired and can fly any day, lives 2 miles from the airport instead 150 miles, and so on? Equipment does make a difference, as do life circumstances and location. Even though it's the OLC is a handicapped contest, there is no way for the handicap system to provide a level playing field for all variations in circumstances. So, for people that think the retrieve problem is holding them back, get a glider with a motor. No cash? Follow Henry Combs example, and burnish your personality to a warm glow that convinces people to crew for you every weekend, week after week, year after year, which is what allowed Henry to amass 200+ 500K straight out distance flights! -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 29, 2013 4:02:50 PM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 4/29/2013 12:28 PM, Steve Leonard wrote: On Monday, April 29, 2013 9:30:09 AM UTC-5, Waveguru wrote: I would like to see how many points the motorglider guys would end up scoring if their motor was rendered unavailable after launch. Blah blah blah. It's definitely not a level playing field. Boggs You are right, Gary. The playing field isn't level. And my flights in mid-west thermals can't compete on a level playing field with Ely thermals, Minden Wave Days, Parowan thermal days, or east coast ridge days, either It's true that having an easy retrieve, whether it's by an eager crew person or a motor, will make a pilot bolder. But the performance of the glider will also change how you fly. For example, would a pilot's flying change if he was plucked from a Blanik and dropped into an ASG 29? Or from Nimbus 4 into a 1-26? Oh, you betcha! And how about launch methods? Would what the pilot could achieve change if he had aero-tows available instead of a 1000' car launch? Suppose the pilot is retired and can fly any day, lives 2 miles from the airport instead 150 miles, and so on? Equipment does make a difference, as do life circumstances and location. Even though it's the OLC is a handicapped contest, there is no way for the handicap system to provide a level playing field for all variations in circumstances. So, for people that think the retrieve problem is holding them back, get a glider with a motor. No cash? Follow Henry Combs example, and burnish your personality to a warm glow that convinces people to crew for you every weekend, week after week, year after year, which is what allowed Henry to amass 200+ 500K straight out distance flights! -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) There's a very lengthy discussion going on the Segelflug.de/forum (in German) regarding the question if motorglider and sustainer pilots should get an automatic handicap and how much of it. Since they have at least a factor of 10 or maybe 20 a multiple of these gliders vs. the US, the discussion is surely justified. They are pointing to the adventurous pilot who motors from the Bavarian flatlands into the Alps above the inversion to get an early start. Any honest motorglider pilot will tell you that they can take more risks in trying that really long task, flying till sunset but with the assurance of the aluminum thermal behind them. Especially in the OLC, there is doubtless a severe bonus for having an engine. Herb |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 29, 2013 2:02:50 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 4/29/2013 12:28 PM, Steve Leonard wrote: On Monday, April 29, 2013 9:30:09 AM UTC-5, Waveguru wrote: I would like to see how many points the motorglider guys would end up scoring if their motor was rendered unavailable after launch. Blah blah blah. It's definitely not a level playing field. Boggs You are right, Gary. The playing field isn't level. And my flights in mid-west thermals can't compete on a level playing field with Ely thermals, Minden Wave Days, Parowan thermal days, or east coast ridge days, either It's true that having an easy retrieve, whether it's by an eager crew person or a motor, will make a pilot bolder. But the performance of the glider will also change how you fly. For example, would a pilot's flying change if he was plucked from a Blanik and dropped into an ASG 29? Or from Nimbus 4 into a 1-26? Oh, you betcha! And how about launch methods? Would what the pilot could achieve change if he had aero-tows available instead of a 1000' car launch? Suppose the pilot is retired and can fly any day, lives 2 miles from the airport instead 150 miles, and so on? Equipment does make a difference, as do life circumstances and location. Even though it's the OLC is a handicapped contest, there is no way for the handicap system to provide a level playing field for all variations in circumstances. So, for people that think the retrieve problem is holding them back, get a glider with a motor. No cash? Follow Henry Combs example, and burnish your personality to a warm glow that convinces people to crew for you every weekend, week after week, year after year, which is what allowed Henry to amass 200+ 500K straight out distance flights! -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) I predict this thread will set a record number of posts and views. I’ll confess upfront that I consider the term “motor-glider” an oxymoron, so you know my bias. That said, I believe there are several competitive advantages to having a motor for big OLC flights in the Great Basin. First, pilots often arrive back at base an hour or more before sunset, close their triangle, then try and decide how hard to push in the remaining lift. If you miscalculate, there is a world of difference between flipping a switch and motoring home and a ground retrieve way out in the desert even if you are lucky enough to have that magical “eager crew”. Second, and perhaps even worse, the best days often come back-to-back so an all-night retrieve can mean that the pure glider will miss some of the best conditions and the fat score that comes with it. I can personally attest to the extreme disappointment that come with that. Clearly OLC cannot completely level the playing field in all respects ( geography, the life circumstances of the pilot, launch methods, etc.) But they could very easily handicap the motorglider vs. the pure glider for the distance portion of the OLC (not league, speed, etc.). The only real issue is by how much. As long as we’re opening a can of worms, here’s another—glider flights utilizing class A airspace vs. glider flights below 18K. Michael |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It makes sense that the motor is an advantage as I usually don't have a crew but I haven't flown my motor glider as far as I've flown my pure sailplanes. Hope to change that this year. I really like self launching from places where there's no towplane or not having to wait in a long line for a tow.
I'm not too worried about a motor glider handicap, if it happens. I like flying thermals and can't compete with the wave guys anyway. Jim Dingess |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3 motorgliders go to Detroit | Brad | Soaring | 0 | December 7th 04 03:14 AM |
Motorgliders and TE Probes | Paul Remde | Soaring | 18 | November 29th 04 08:59 PM |
Motorgliders (long) | M B | Soaring | 1 | September 23rd 03 09:15 PM |
Gliders and motorgliders | Mike Borgelt | Soaring | 0 | September 22nd 03 10:57 PM |
Motorgliders and gliders in US... | M B | Soaring | 1 | September 22nd 03 10:33 PM |