![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting that many have not defined the origin of the placement of
the "red line" on the tachometer. I don't know where to look it up, but I suspect it has something to do with prop tip speed (as one poster mentioned). Shorten the prop, lengthen the prop, change the pitch and you will necessisarily change the placement of the redline on the tach. Change the pistons (bore); change the rods (stroke); change the rings (compression); change the induction system; change the exhaust (back pressure) and you change the torque of the engine, again altering the redline. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shorten the prop, lengthen the prop, change the pitch and you will
necessisarily change the placement of the redline on the tach. Doesn't this imply that redline RPM isn't related to engine limitations? Why would (just for example) shortening the prop allow one to raise the RPM limit of the engine? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Doesn't this imply that redline RPM isn't related to engine limitations? I believe it's both. Why would (just for example) shortening the prop allow one to raise the RPM limit of the engine? It's bad to allow the prop tip to go supersonic. I believe that this is because the shock wave reduces the efficiency of the prop. Others can chime in on this. Shortening the prop "slows" the linear speed that the prop tip is experiencing at a given RPM. -- __!__ Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___ http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! ! http://www.oceancityairport.com http://www.oc-adolfos.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why would (just for example) shortening the prop allow one to raise the
RPM limit of the engine? It's bad to allow the prop tip to go supersonic. Understood. However, how is it that you can up the RPM limit of a given engine simply because you want to keep the prop tips subsonic? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
However, how is it that you can up the RPM limit of a given engine simply because you want to keep the prop tips subsonic? You would decrease the RPM limit, not increase it, to keep the tips subsonic. -- __!__ Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___ http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! ! http://www.oceancityairport.com http://www.oc-adolfos.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
However, how is it that you can up the RPM limit of a given engine
simply because you want to keep the prop tips subsonic? You would decrease the RPM limit, not increase it, to keep the tips subsonic. Understood. If you lengthened the prop, you'd have to decrease the RPM redline to keep the tips subsonic. However, the part of the question I was referring to was if you *shortened* the prop. Part of the original post implied that you would be able to simply *increase* the engine's redline RPM if you shortened your prop, regardless of engine limitations. I don't believe this is true. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "EDR" wrote in message ... Interesting that many have not defined the origin of the placement of the "red line" on the tachometer. I don't know where to look it up, but I suspect it has something to do with prop tip speed (as one poster mentioned). It can have something to do with it, but the same engine in different airplanes will have a different redline. The thing that changes is TBO. The propeller chosen for that installation will be consistent with the engine service life desired. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , C J Campbell
wrote: "EDR" wrote in message ... Interesting that many have not defined the origin of the placement of the "red line" on the tachometer. I don't know where to look it up, but I suspect it has something to do with prop tip speed (as one poster mentioned). It can have something to do with it, but the same engine in different airplanes will have a different redline. The thing that changes is TBO. The propeller chosen for that installation will be consistent with the engine service life desired. That's right. Some airplanes have prohibited operation in the middle of the RPM range because of harmonics. Certain models of Cessna 210's, for example. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shorten the prop, lengthen the prop, change the pitch and you will
necessisarily change the placement of the redline on the tach. No you won't. Redline is engine speed related only. Redline has a fixed rpm no matter what you attach or change at the output shaft (in our case a propeller). Take the prop off and use full throttle... the engine will most certainly reach redline, the same redline you had before you removed the prop. Redline speed does not change. The engine has a point where spinning it faster starts floating valves and causing damage. This is a constant speed. If you change the pitch and/or increase size of the prop, the engine won't be able to spin the large prop up to redline. This doesn't mean the engine won't have huge amount of stress on it trying to do so. It won't reach redline, but redline remains at the same speed. Richard "EDR" wrote in message ... Interesting that many have not defined the origin of the placement of the "red line" on the tachometer. I don't know where to look it up, but I suspect it has something to do with prop tip speed (as one poster mentioned). Change the pistons (bore); change the rods (stroke); change the rings (compression); change the induction system; change the exhaust (back pressure) and you change the torque of the engine, again altering the redline. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are You Flying a "Beater?" | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 90 | June 16th 04 11:38 AM |
Contract Tower Program - Discussion Thread | running with scissors | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | April 22nd 04 04:04 AM |
Baby Bush will be Closing Airports in California to VFR Flight Again | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 119 | March 13th 04 02:56 AM |
Fuel line thread sealant | Paul Lee | Home Built | 7 | February 26th 04 12:44 AM |
recovery from inverted IMC (a propos of "backup gyros" thread) | Sydney Hoeltzli | Piloting | 4 | July 15th 03 02:00 PM |