1959 C175 for sale

Wings For Christ, an aviation ministry in Waco, TX is selling our 1959
Cessna 175 so we can move up to a larger aircraft to meet our mission
transport needs. You can see the aircraft at www.wings-for-christ.org.
Please contact me if you're interested.

If you or your company would like to help our ministry or are just looking
for a nice tax deduction, we would be interested in a C206, Cherokee 6, or
similar aircraft, even if they need some work.

Mike
remove the Zs in the email to reply

selling our 1959 Cessna 175

I've lost track of the 175 series numbering system, but the one (175C?) we
owned had a constant speed prop and was a fine airplane. Early versions (which
this one may be) had a fixed pitch prop and was not a particularly 'popular'
model.

But that 175 hp (geared GO-300 at 3200 rpm, I believe) and the constant speed
prop we owned provided everything the 172 is famous for, plus added
performance. I believe their asking price is just under $30K, and may be a
bargain for what could be a nice, low time (2100TT airframe, 190 smoh)airplane.

CVBreard wrote:

selling our 1959 Cessna 175

I've lost track of the 175 series numbering system, but the one (175C?) we
owned had a constant speed prop and was a fine airplane. Early versions (which
this one may be) had a fixed pitch prop and was not a particularly 'popular'
model.

But that 175 hp (geared GO-300 at 3200 rpm, I believe) and the constant speed
prop we owned provided everything the 172 is famous for, plus added
performance. I believe their asking price is just under $30K, and may be a
bargain for what could be a nice, low time (2100TT airframe, 190 smoh)airplane.

It looks fixed pitch to me. There are issues in regards to parts
availability for the gearbox. One listed on Barnstormers, includes 2
engines... There are STC's to replace the entire firewall forward with
more commonly available equipment... But 175hp has got to be alot better
than 145...

It looks fixed pitch to me. There are issues in regards to parts
availability for the gearbox. One listed on Barnstormers, includes 2
engines... There are STC's to replace the entire firewall forward with
more commonly available equipment... But 175hp has got to be alot better
than 145...

Agree.

Too bad the owner didn't consider the STC to a different engine "190 hours" ago
(smoh).

And yep, the 175 hp (with constant speed prop) wasn't that much faster in
cruise (10K?) but accelerated and got off the ground quicker/less runway and
faster ROC. In the 172s, 145 hp was 'adequate', the extra 30 hp was a delight.