![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to get my multi rating and then buy a light twin. I have done
some research (very little actualy) but it seems from what I have read and been told that the piper aztec is a fairly easy twin to learn to fly, not too much of a maintenance hog and is a good solid aircraft. Not to mention that some of the older ones are not that expensive to buy. I would use it for personal use only, kinda like a family air wagon so I don't want to be spending oodles of money just to use it. Does anyone have any suggestions as to the cost of using a aircraft such as this? Or would I be better off looking at a good 6 place single? I kinda have this thing about twin engine planes although I also realize 2 engines = double the cost. Thanks for your input! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Burns" writes:
Been there, done that. Bought a 1966 C model last month. email me with any questions and I can tell you everything we've learned (so far) Hey! Don't hide that info! I'll be happy to share about my 1966 C model too. There's been lots of info posted here (and in rec.aviation.owning) already but fire away with new questions. --kyler |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyler Laird" wrote in message ... Hey! Don't hide that info! Ok, my partners and I were looking or a 6 place that would haul significantly more than the 182RG we'd been leasing. 2 of us had recently gotten our multi rating and had a friend that is a CFII/AI owned an Aztec. Through him we'd learn how to research the different models and years and what to really look for. We flew with him several times and he really showed us how amazing this airplane is. Remember, it's got the same airfoil as a SuperCub, now strap on two 250hp engines and you can make it do some remarkable things. Although it's a twin and has more complex systems than complex/hi performance singles, the systems are "relatively" simple for a twin. We narrowed our search down to a 66 C model or newer. The C model came standard with fuel injected engines and the 66 was the first year with the larger rear baggage door/compartment. The 66 also has center stack radios but didn't come with a standard T instrument configuration. So far this hasn't been a problem. Things to look for: Fuel bladder condition and age If the plane has sat for awhile, make sure the bladders have been full, or pickled. Check them for leaks when they are completely full. AD's and SB's The latest expensive AD is the flap torque tube AD, requiring an inspection every 500 hours or replacement. Our plane had the tube replaced, now the AD is not applicable. Depending on the props and hubs, they can be effected by some nasty Harzell prop AD's. Ours was not effected. Depending on when the engines were rebuilt, they may or may not be effected by the Lycoming crankshaft retaining bolt AD. Ours were not. There is an AD on the heater to have it pressure tested every 100 hours of operation, so a separate hobbs meter on the heater will pay for itself. Owner assisted maintenance is a must if you want to keep the bills down. The Aztec is easy to work on and if you keep up with it, nothing will get to big. We've replaced a few drain and overflow hoses, the cabin door lock, and are currently installing new fuel cover gaskets and oil cooler braces. The flaps and gear are hydraulic and operated through a mutual "power pac". The pack is full of poppet valves and O-rings that need to be fresh. If your power pac hasn't been overhauled recently, insist on it or a replacement before purchasing. Figure $2000. The hydraulic pump is an engine driven pump on the left engine, so if you loose your left (critical) engine, you'll be pumping the flaps and gear up and down by hand. A nice add-on would be an electric hydraulic pump. Avoid the old Altimatic II autopilots, they are no longer serviceable. We looked at one plane that had one and had to right off the plane simply because it had a non working Altimatic II. Autopilots Central informed us that it wasn't worth even looking at and we couldn't afford to put a new S-Tec into that particular plane for what the owner was asking. The 66 that we bought actually has an S-Tec 60-2 in it. It would have cost us over $11,000 to replace the Altimatic II in the other plane. Look for planes that were corporate owned or part 135 operated. They typically have better maintenance, but beware, there are still things to watch out for. Remember you can always fix things by throwing money at them, but money will never make your airplane any newer. Shop smart. There were over 10,000 Aztecs made over the years. The E model is most numerous, followed by the C, then the F. We couldn't afford anything newer than a C. The A's and B's are airplanes of a different era. When you get into a C, the systems and especially the electrical system are greatly improved and modernized including alternators rather than generators. There are very few D's and the differences from a C are mostly cosmetic. The E get's you a longer pointed nose but not much more front baggage. Due to the pointed nose the E and F also was forced to come with an elevator down spring (bungee) that gives more pitch stability. We installed one in our C and it makes holding altitude and trimming much easier. No more porpoiseing. This Piper kit cost us $600 installed. All Aztecs are basically overgrown Apaches. Tube fuselage, which needs to be inspected thoroughly during a pre-purchase. There are all kinds of mods and STC's available. You can take a C model and turn it into a look-alike F model if you want. You can get speed kits, casket doors, extended noses, wing tips and tip tanks, you name it. As far as expenses, we've been flying ours at around 165mph at reduced power settings and have found the fuel burn to be around 22 gallons per hour, total. Push everything to the wall, lean it out, and 25-28 gallons is typical at about 200mph. Most of our partners and our family members are small people so filling the seats, the tanks and the baggage isn't a problem, so we typically load and go. We're looking at replacing the bench seat in the rear with two captains chairs, then extending the rear baggage compartment into the tail section. This will make a cavernous rear baggage area with the rear seats removed. Take off and landing performance is awesome with a little practice. Accelerate stop distances are around 2200 feet and if you don't have any obstacles, you can get in and out of 1/2 that length if you need to. Climb rates around 1400 fpm will get you up through the haze or overcast in no time with plenty of extra power. We found a plane that was owned by a man who was meticulous about replacing worn items with new parts. So what we found was that during the previous 3 annuals, over $25,000 had been spent. It was spent on items that we won't have to replace in the near future, infact, he even pulled the gyro instruments before our purchase and had them rebuilt, "just to be sure" nothing was wrong. There are a lot of Aztecs for sale. You'll find a good one, just be patient and wait for one that you won't have to dump your life savings into. We compared 3 Aztecs all in the $85,000 to $90,000 range and the one we bought stood out like a rose. Look for one that has all the electronics and radios that you want. Because there are so many, there are a lot of Aztecs that have been upgraded. Jim --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.756 / Virus Database: 506 - Release Date: 9/8/2004 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Burns" writes:
As far as expenses, we've been flying ours at around 165mph at reduced power settings and have found the fuel burn to be around 22 gallons per hour, total. Push everything to the wall, lean it out, and 25-28 gallons is typical at about 200mph. Wow! I wish I got that. I'm more like 32 GPH then. (I'm still working on the art of leaning a turbo'd plane.) Most of our partners and our family members are small people so filling the seats, the tanks and the baggage isn't a problem, so we typically load and go. Yeah, it's a luxury not to be understated. We're looking at replacing the bench seat in the rear with two captains chairs, then extending the rear baggage compartment into the tail section. This will make a cavernous rear baggage area with the rear seats removed. I want to hear more about this. I have been interested in this for years and a need for it appeared again recently. I'd especially like to be able to replace the bench seat with a single seat so that I can seat five and still have access to the rear baggage. Thanks for the info! --kyler |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow! I wish I got that. I'm more like 32 GPH then. (I'm still working
on the art of leaning a turbo'd plane.) Ours isn't turboed. .. I want to hear more about this. I have been interested in this for years and a need for it appeared again recently. I'd especially like to be able to replace the bench seat with a single seat so that I can seat five and still have access to the rear baggage. I think the middle seats are interchangeable for the rear bench, the tracks go all the way to the back. All you need is an extra middle seat. Our AI friend did this to his and got a field approval. If you remove the rear bulkhead from the rear baggage compartment, you can see how much room is in the tail. My friend fabricated the sides, bottom, end and top then upholstered them and mounted them to the interior support braces of the tail. It's a bit "funnel" shaped and doesn't add to the 150 lbs max, but it's great for long or light stuff. A new arm for this part of the baggage compartment was also computed and posted. One concern if you live where it's cold is how to seal off the rear baggage when the weather get's cold. I'm thinking of an upholsterd and insulated panel that will velcro or snap into place behind the rear seats. Or maybe some kind of an insulated roll up curtain that you could roll up and fasten to the head liner or drop down and snap at the bottom like the rear bench seat back does. Something to keep the cold air in the back and the warm air in the front but removeable. There is also a bulk head in the nose that the center can be cut out of. Great for stuffing hats, gloves, and light stuff. Also, if you have any radios mounted in the nose, you may be able to move them to one side to add more useable space like a hat rack. Jim --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.756 / Virus Database: 506 - Release Date: 9/8/2004 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know I'm responding to my own post, but a few more things about Aztecs
have popped into my head. The cowlings are extremely tight and hold a lot of heat inside. Be sure to open the cowl flaps as part of your pre landing check list and keep them full open during take offs and any ground operations. You may consider removeing the heat shroud from the front of the exhaust system. This directs heat into the alternate air system and seems to be a left over from the non fuel injected engines as carb heat air source. It traps a lot of heat up front near the inside of the fiberglass nose bowl. Those nose bowls are expensive, be sure to inspect the interior of the lower section for burned and cracked fiberglass. You may contemplate lining the bottom of the bowl with heat reflective aluminum tape or paint. You may also consider installing the cowling louvers that came standard on turbo charged models. See what your AI will let you get away with. As a result of the tight cowling and the heat, make sure everything rubber inside the cowling has been inspected and replaced if necessary.... hoses, gaskets, air baffles, seals, etc. There is also an STC to have additional ram air routed to the vacuum pump to allow it to run cooler, a good idea if you're looking at an Aztec with de-ice boots. If the exhaust system needs replacement, talk to your shop about shortening it or raising it up away from the cowling. The further away from the cowling those hot pipes are, the better. There are a lot of Aztecs without shoulder harnesses. If you find one that has them, consider them worth a couple hundred bucks each. Direct from Piper they are big bucks and even from junk yards, they ain't cheap. This is a great safety feature and would most likely save a few lives. Smashing your face into the instrument panel may be bad enough, but to have one or two rear seat passengers pile onto your back besides would most likely ruin your day. The landing gear is built like it belongs on a tank. Fairly simple and very rugged. Grass strips are no problem, just pay attention to the prop clearance, it's not a lot. Check for any binding or pinching, the gear should work freely. Loose is better than too tight. Most older Aztecs only have brakes on the pilots side, co-pilot brakes were optional or an add on. You may find one that doesn't have a landing light in the tip of the nose. There was a differant nose for Aztecs that had radar, thus the radome. Most have a landing light in the nose, and a taxi light mounted to the nose gear that makes it steerable. Turn off the taxi light before take off. With two baggage compartments, one in the nose, one in the tail, you must give consideration to how you load the airplane. Generally speaking, you load the front 4 passengers and the rear baggage compartment first, to move the CG aft, then load the nose baggage compartment to move the CG forward slightly, then the rear seat passengers last. The POH has specific instructions. The C model had a gross weight increase from 4800 to 5200 lbs, but there is a zero fuel weight of 4500 lbs. Some Aztecs, includeing ours, have thermo-pain windows. Yes I spelled that pain. They rub together and get crazed and scratched. If all other things are equal, avoid the thermo-pains and go with regular or 1/4" glass. One piece windshields are available so you can get rid of the center post, move the outside air temp prob to the side, and train the compass to hang from the head liner, all for better visability. Jim --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.756 / Virus Database: 506 - Release Date: 9/8/2004 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thank you very much Jim for your very valuable info. I have much to digest
and will be looking for quite a while. I'm not in a hurry to buy just yet but, now atleast I have some great info to make a informed purchase. Again I thank you very much for your posts and maybe someday I'll meet you at a flyin with my Aztec. ![]() Gary "Jim Burns" wrote in message ... I know I'm responding to my own post, but a few more things about Aztecs have popped into my head. The cowlings are extremely tight and hold a lot of heat inside. Be sure to open the cowl flaps as part of your pre landing check list and keep them full open during take offs and any ground operations. You may consider removeing the heat shroud from the front of the exhaust system. This directs heat into the alternate air system and seems to be a left over from the non fuel injected engines as carb heat air source. It traps a lot of heat up front near the inside of the fiberglass nose bowl. Those nose bowls are expensive, be sure to inspect the interior of the lower section for burned and cracked fiberglass. You may contemplate lining the bottom of the bowl with heat reflective aluminum tape or paint. You may also consider installing the cowling louvers that came standard on turbo charged models. See what your AI will let you get away with. As a result of the tight cowling and the heat, make sure everything rubber inside the cowling has been inspected and replaced if necessary.... hoses, gaskets, air baffles, seals, etc. There is also an STC to have additional ram air routed to the vacuum pump to allow it to run cooler, a good idea if you're looking at an Aztec with de-ice boots. If the exhaust system needs replacement, talk to your shop about shortening it or raising it up away from the cowling. The further away from the cowling those hot pipes are, the better. There are a lot of Aztecs without shoulder harnesses. If you find one that has them, consider them worth a couple hundred bucks each. Direct from Piper they are big bucks and even from junk yards, they ain't cheap. This is a great safety feature and would most likely save a few lives. Smashing your face into the instrument panel may be bad enough, but to have one or two rear seat passengers pile onto your back besides would most likely ruin your day. The landing gear is built like it belongs on a tank. Fairly simple and very rugged. Grass strips are no problem, just pay attention to the prop clearance, it's not a lot. Check for any binding or pinching, the gear should work freely. Loose is better than too tight. Most older Aztecs only have brakes on the pilots side, co-pilot brakes were optional or an add on. You may find one that doesn't have a landing light in the tip of the nose. There was a differant nose for Aztecs that had radar, thus the radome. Most have a landing light in the nose, and a taxi light mounted to the nose gear that makes it steerable. Turn off the taxi light before take off. With two baggage compartments, one in the nose, one in the tail, you must give consideration to how you load the airplane. Generally speaking, you load the front 4 passengers and the rear baggage compartment first, to move the CG aft, then load the nose baggage compartment to move the CG forward slightly, then the rear seat passengers last. The POH has specific instructions. The C model had a gross weight increase from 4800 to 5200 lbs, but there is a zero fuel weight of 4500 lbs. Some Aztecs, includeing ours, have thermo-pain windows. Yes I spelled that pain. They rub together and get crazed and scratched. If all other things are equal, avoid the thermo-pains and go with regular or 1/4" glass. One piece windshields are available so you can get rid of the center post, move the outside air temp prob to the side, and train the compass to hang from the head liner, all for better visability. Jim --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.756 / Virus Database: 506 - Release Date: 9/8/2004 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Burns" writes:
There are a lot of Aztecs without shoulder harnesses. If you find one that has them, consider them worth a couple hundred bucks each. Direct from Piper they are big bucks and even from junk yards, they ain't cheap. Ah! Yet another topic of interest to me. I don't have harnesses and I want them. Are retractables available as add-ons? I've looked a few times but have not found them. The landing gear is built like it belongs on a tank. Fairly simple and very rugged. Mine was installed incorrectly (and passed a couple mechanics' inspections over the years) and still handled my abusive landings with grace. Turn off the taxi light before take off. Do we agree that the taxi light *should* extinguish itself when it's retracted? Some Aztecs, includeing ours, have thermo-pain windows. Yes I spelled that pain. They rub together and get crazed and scratched. If all other things are equal, avoid the thermo-pains and go with regular or 1/4" glass. I've gone with .25" glass. I like it. One piece windshields are available so you can get rid of the center post, move the outside air temp prob to the side, and train the compass to hang from the head liner, all for better visability. Or get an electronic temp. probe (as part of an engine monitor) and put a card compass on the glareshield. --kyler |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"onsitewelding" wrote in message
I would use it for personal use only, kinda like a family air wagon so I don't want to be spending oodles of money just to use it. Does anyone have any suggestions as to the cost of using a aircraft such as this? Or would I be better off looking at a good 6 place single? I've owned Aztecs. They are wonderful for personal and commercial use. I ran mine at 24 gallons/hour for 150 KIAS. Maintenance costs weren't excessive. When doing a pre-buy, have your inspector give attention to the steel tubing in the airframe. I've seen a few that were badly rusted below the floorboards. Repairing the tubing is expensive. Fortunately it isn't common. The aluminum part of the airframe was zinc-chromated by the factory. D. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aztec Curtains and curtain sliders | Jim Burns | Owning | 0 | January 24th 05 05:27 PM |
Gear problem in an Aztec PA23-250 | Robert Borucki | General Aviation | 3 | December 17th 04 07:08 PM |
Any Aztec owners/flyers in the group? | Jim Burns | Owning | 6 | July 21st 04 03:47 PM |
WTB: Piper Aztec C | Jim Burns | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 20th 04 07:38 PM |
HELP! To buy or not...rough 63 aztec for $25,000 | david | Owning | 27 | January 15th 04 01:06 AM |