![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Schempp-Hirth has issued a tech note 396-8 for Duo Discus serial numbers 165
through 389, and Duo Discus T serial numbers 1 through 78. These Duo Discus must not be flown until the inspection and repair (if necessary) is accomplished. Further details of these tech notes can be found on their web site. http://www.schempp-hirth.com or, we can email you copies of the tech note. Essentially, the bond between the spar and skin of the glider must be inspected for voids. The inspection will take 3 to 5 hours. We are contacting USA repair shops to find out if they have the necessary tools for the inspection and repair. Please call or email us with your questions. Tom Knauff Knauff & Grove Soaring Supplies (814) 355 2483 fax (814) 355 2633 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Schempp-Hirth has issued a tech note 396-8 for Duo Discus serial numbers 165
through 389, and Duo Discus T serial numbers 1 through 78. These Duo Discus must not be flown until the inspection and repair (if necessary) is accomplished. Tom Knauff Neither the LBA nor the manufacturer has the authority to ground gliders operating with U.S. Standard Airwothiness Certificates. As of today, the FAA has not issued an AD requiring compliance with the Spar inspection technical note issued by Schempp-Hirth on the Duo Discus. There is every likelihood that the FAA will issue an AD regarding this. However the factory's own web page states that, "For security reasons a larger number of Duo Discus and Duo Discus T have been grounded, as the exact serial numbers of potentially affected gliders could not be determined in the short time given." We may find that the FAA pushes the factory to determine the exact serial numbers of potentially affected gliders, so that a more accurate set of glider serial numbers can be included in any U.S. AD. So for now at least, for U.S. owners, compliance with the inspection is at their own discretion. Interestingly, someone said to me the other day that if the potential for faulty construction goes back at least 5 years with the DUO and it includes CS DUOs manufactured in a different country, maybe the LBA should consider requiring inspections on other Schempp-Hirth models as well? I would think that the factory would at least put up a page on their Web site so that the DUO owners can see what the statistical results of the inspections are as this debacle unfolds. In the meantime, maybe the DUO owners can post to the news group with the results of their gliders inspection and the degree of repairs required. I'm sure the DUO owners would greatly appreciate the information. M Eiler |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While it is correct that only the local Aviation Authority has the power
to ground aircraft it would be extremely unwise to ignore a safety warning from the manufacturer. The tech note and advice from Schemmp Hirth was correctly represented - the factory say these aircraft must not be flown until inspected. If you are affected by a factory defect, you might get some credit when it comes to repair. If you (or your bereaved spouse) are the proud owner of a pile of composite confetti, you may find the factory and your insurance company less helpful. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Legally quite true, I guess.
However, if a manufacturer comes forward and says that serial no's x to y are potentially not airworthy, common sense requires those aircrafts to be grounded even if local authorities are not up to the news. -- Bert Willing ASW20 "TW" "Caracole" a écrit dans le message de om... Schempp-Hirth has issued a tech note 396-8 for Duo Discus serial numbers 165 through 389, and Duo Discus T serial numbers 1 through 78. These Duo Discus must not be flown until the inspection and repair (if necessary) is accomplished. Tom Knauff Neither the LBA nor the manufacturer has the authority to ground gliders operating with U.S. Standard Airwothiness Certificates. As of today, the FAA has not issued an AD requiring compliance with the Spar inspection technical note issued by Schempp-Hirth on the Duo Discus. There is every likelihood that the FAA will issue an AD regarding this. However the factory's own web page states that, "For security reasons a larger number of Duo Discus and Duo Discus T have been grounded, as the exact serial numbers of potentially affected gliders could not be determined in the short time given." We may find that the FAA pushes the factory to determine the exact serial numbers of potentially affected gliders, so that a more accurate set of glider serial numbers can be included in any U.S. AD. So for now at least, for U.S. owners, compliance with the inspection is at their own discretion. Interestingly, someone said to me the other day that if the potential for faulty construction goes back at least 5 years with the DUO and it includes CS DUOs manufactured in a different country, maybe the LBA should consider requiring inspections on other Schempp-Hirth models as well? I would think that the factory would at least put up a page on their Web site so that the DUO owners can see what the statistical results of the inspections are as this debacle unfolds. In the meantime, maybe the DUO owners can post to the news group with the results of their gliders inspection and the degree of repairs required. I'm sure the DUO owners would greatly appreciate the information. M Eiler |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone see a first person account of the accident? It sounds like it
might be some good reading. I wonder exactly how the pilots were able to regain control after the failure? I'm assuming the accident occurred in Germany. Is there a German equivalent to www.ntsb.gov where we can read about the accident report? -bob |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And of course although quick, a posting on RAS or an
update on a manufacturers web site does not mean that everyone affected will find out... At 07:42 05 August 2003, Bert Willing wrote: Legally quite true, I guess. However, if a manufacturer comes forward and says that serial no's x to y are potentially not airworthy, common sense requires those aircrafts to be grounded even if local authorities are not up to the news. -- Bert Willing ASW20 'TW' 'Caracole' a écrit dans le message de . com... Schempp-Hirth has issued a tech note 396-8 for Duo Discus serial numbers 165 through 389, and Duo Discus T serial numbers 1 through 78. These Duo Discus must not be flown until the inspection and repair (if necessary) is accomplished. Tom Knauff Neither the LBA nor the manufacturer has the authority to ground gliders operating with U.S. Standard Airwothiness Certificates. As of today, the FAA has not issued an AD requiring compliance with the Spar inspection technical note issued by Schempp-Hirth on the Duo Discus. There is every likelihood that the FAA will issue an AD regarding this. However the factory's own web page states that, 'For security reasons a larger number of Duo Discus and Duo Discus T have been grounded, as the exact serial numbers of potentially affected gliders could not be determined in the short time given.' We may find that the FAA pushes the factory to determine the exact serial numbers of potentially affected gliders, so that a more accurate set of glider serial numbers can be included in any U.S. AD. So for now at least, for U.S. owners, compliance with the inspection is at their own discretion. Interestingly, someone said to me the other day that if the potential for faulty construction goes back at least 5 years with the DUO and it includes CS DUOs manufactured in a different country, maybe the LBA should consider requiring inspections on other Schempp-Hirth models as well? I would think that the factory would at least put up a page on their Web site so that the DUO owners can see what the statistical results of the inspections are as this debacle unfolds. In the meantime, maybe the DUO owners can post to the news group with the results of their gliders inspection and the degree of repairs required. I'm sure the DUO owners would greatly appreciate the information. M Eiler |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Stevens" wrote...
And of course although quick, a posting on RAS or an update on a manufacturers web site does not mean that everyone affected will find out... You shouldn't assume those were the only ways those affected were notified. I received a phone call from Rex Mayes at Williams Soaring Center a full 24 hours before anything appeared on RAS or the web site. Schempp-Hirth apparently asked him to contact all Duo owners on the west coast of the US. BTW, Rex now has an endoscope, and is in the midst of his first inspection... Marc |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I spoke to a friend and Duo owner today who visited
Southern Sailplanes (the UK agents and repairers) yesterday where 3 Duos were examined using a small video camera on a long pole. Apparently the inspections could be done in 'about 10 minutes' per wing without inspection holes being drilled in the wing skins. He tells me that 2 Duos passed and one newish Duo failed. John Galloway |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Bob,that would be www.bfu-web.de, which is the web page
of the 'investigation office for aviation in/accidents' in germany. But don´t expect any up-to-date information there, in that respect it is not comparable to the NTSB web page...Best regards,MarkusAt 15:12 05 August 2003, Bob Mowry wrote:Anyone see a first person account of the accident? It sounds like itmight be some good reading. I wonder exactly how the pilots were ableto regain control after the failure?I'm assuming the accident occurred in Germany. Is there a Germanequivalent to www.ntsb.gov where we can read about the accidentreport?-bob |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SSA's contact at the FAA's Small Airplane Directorate
reports receiving copies of the Duo Discus TN and German-issued AD yesterday. These documents and further information requested of LBA/Schempp Hirth will be reviewed prior to issuance of a US AD. No estimate on when a US AD may be issued, but an 'airworthiness concern sheet' (preliminary to actual AD issuance) is expected this week. In terms of what lies ahead, please note that when a US AD is issued on the basis of a foreign country's findings, it often adopts the same inspection procedures and remedies. (So owners who comply with the LBA-issued AD now stand a good chance of being in compliance with the US AD whenever it is issued.) Judy |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experienced avionics tech needed | Skypilot | General Aviation | 0 | January 5th 05 06:07 AM |
Experienced avionics tech needed | Skypilot | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 5th 05 06:06 AM |
24/7 computer tech support | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | May 5th 04 03:32 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
anybody recognize this page from a Mil tech manual? | George R. Gonzalez | Military Aviation | 1 | October 9th 03 04:00 PM |