|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
January 23rd 16, 11:19 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
Back to the drawing board
Odd. It worked just fine on dry land a few weeks ago
|
|
#2
January 24th 16, 10:20 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back to the drawing board
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:19:02 -0600, "Byker" wrote:
Odd. It worked just fine on dry land a few weeks ago "Well, at least the pieces were bigger this time" - Elon Musk
|
|
#3
January 24th 16, 01:37 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back to the drawing board
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:19:02 -0600, "Byker" wrote:
Odd. It worked just fine on dry land a few weeks ago Hang on.. it has only 3 legs? That's a dangerously unstable configuration...
|
|
#4
January 25th 16, 07:08 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back to the drawing board
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:37:38 +0000, R2D2 wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:19:02 -0600, "Byker" wrote: Odd. It worked just fine on dry land a few weeks ago Hang on.. it has only 3 legs? That's a dangerously unstable configuration... Four legs, but it appears that as it tips on two, they collapse. http://www.space.com/29770-spacex-ca...cket-test.html
|
|
#5
January 26th 16, 12:24 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back to the drawing board
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:08:08 -0800, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)"
wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:37:38 +0000, R2D2 wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:19:02 -0600, "Byker" wrote: Odd. It worked just fine on dry land a few weeks ago Hang on.. it has only 3 legs? That's a dangerously unstable configuration... Four legs, but it appears that as it tips on two, they collapse. http://www.space.com/29770-spacex-ca...cket-test.html They really should put 5 or 6. It would make it a lot easier to compensate for any tiny movement...
|
|
#6
January 26th 16, 01:51 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back to the drawing board
"R2D2" wrote in message ...
They really should put 5 or 6. It would make it a lot easier to compensate for any tiny movement... It would mean more weight, which is probably why they stuck to four
|
|
#7
January 26th 16, 12:15 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back to the drawing board
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:24:39 +0000, R2D2 wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:08:08 -0800, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)" wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:37:38 +0000, R2D2 wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:19:02 -0600, "Byker" wrote: Odd. It worked just fine on dry land a few weeks ago Hang on.. it has only 3 legs? That's a dangerously unstable configuration... Four legs, but it appears that as it tips on two, they collapse. http://www.space.com/29770-spacex-ca...cket-test.html They really should put 5 or 6. It would make it a lot easier to compensate for any tiny movement... I wonder how much cargo capacity is alrteady sacrificed with the extra hardware and fuel to allow it to soft land?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Blue Angels back in Pensacola - practice session - Diamond heading back to the hangar | Pensacola Beachcomber | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 23rd 08 05:28 PM |
| Drawing of an A-4 9801811.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 9th 07 02:35 PM |
| From Popular Mechanics: "Flying Off The Drawing Board" | AJ | Piloting | 1 | July 4th 06 11:08 PM |
| Smyth Sidewinder drawing 302-2 | Juan Jimenez | Home Built | 0 | November 20th 05 10:42 PM |
| I am in the air force, being medically separted/board. However, I owe the air force $109,978. I would like to pay it back. | wanglu | Military Aviation | 7 | September 25th 03 08:14 AM |
Hybrid Mode
