Public ADS-B Performance Report Request

If you have installed ADS-B out or TABS, you will be interested in this

https://adsbperformance.faa.gov/PAPRRequest.aspx

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 3:21:10 PM UTC-8, son_of_flubber wrote:
If you have installed ADS-B out or TABS, you will be interested in this

https://adsbperformance.faa.gov/PAPRRequest.aspx

Thanks Flub,

It was on my list to track that down.

Cheers,
Craig
7Q

Got a report yesterday on my new ADS-B Out/In in our Skywagon. Perfect
performance!

On 3/6/2018 5:59 PM, Craig Funston wrote:
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 3:21:10 PM UTC-8, son_of_flubber wrote:
If you have installed ADS-B out or TABS, you will be interested in this

https://adsbperformance.faa.gov/PAPRRequest.aspx
Thanks Flub,

It was on my list to track that down.

Cheers,
Craig
7Q

--
Dan, 5J

No Trig TT21? Isn’t that a valid TABS device?

Andy

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:11:59 PM UTC-8, Andy Blackburn wrote:
No Trig TT21? Isn’t that a valid TABS device?

Andy

These reports were not designed for TABS devices, they are for 2020 CompliantADS-B Out devices which the TT21 is *not*.

But if you have a TT21 and doing a check yourself on your TABS system I just say it's a TT22 and then in the comments section say its really a TT21 configured for TABS/TCO-C199 and that this install is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

Even if its a TT22 but configured for TABS in a type certified glider I would also make a note that this is a TABS/TCO-C199 and is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

These reports will likely eventually noticed by FSDO staff and they might not understand TABS, if they do reach out to you use that as a chance to educate them/point them at TSO-C199. Or just point them at me, I'm happy to help.

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:29:56 PM UTC-8, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:11:59 PM UTC-8, Andy Blackburn wrote:
No Trig TT21? Isn’t that a valid TABS device?

Andy

These reports were not designed for TABS devices, they are for 2020 CompliantADS-B Out devices which the TT21 is *not*.

But if you have a TT21 and doing a check yourself on your TABS system I just say it's a TT22 and then in the comments section say its really a TT21 configured for TABS/TCO-C199 and that this install is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

Even if its a TT22 but configured for TABS in a type certified glider I would also make a note that this is a TABS/TCO-C199 and is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

These reports will likely eventually noticed by FSDO staff and they might not understand TABS, if they do reach out to you use that as a chance to educate them/point them at TSO-C199. Or just point them at me, I'm happy to help.

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:29:56 PM UTC-8, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:11:59 PM UTC-8, Andy Blackburn wrote:
No Trig TT21? Isn’t that a valid TABS device?

Andy

These reports were not designed for TABS devices, they are for 2020 CompliantADS-B Out devices which the TT21 is *not*.

But if you have a TT21 and doing a check yourself on your TABS system I just say it's a TT22 and then in the comments section say its really a TT21 configured for TABS/TCO-C199 and that this install is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

Even if its a TT22 but configured for TABS in a type certified glider I would also make a note that this is a TABS/TCO-C199 and is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

These reports will likely eventually noticed by FSDO staff and they might not understand TABS, if they do reach out to you use that as a chance to educate them/point them at TSO-C199. Or just point them at me, I'm happy to help.

Grr I meant 91.225/227 not 21.blah.

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 6:02:43 PM UTC-8, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:29:56 PM UTC-8, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 5:11:59 PM UTC-8, Andy Blackburn wrote:
No Trig TT21? Isn’t that a valid TABS device?

Andy

These reports were not designed for TABS devices, they are for 2020 CompliantADS-B Out devices which the TT21 is *not*.

But if you have a TT21 and doing a check yourself on your TABS system I just say it's a TT22 and then in the comments section say its really a TT21 configured for TABS/TCO-C199 and that this install is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

Even if its a TT22 but configured for TABS in a type certified glider I would also make a note that this is a TABS/TCO-C199 and is not seeking to comply with 14 CFR 21.225/227.

These reports will likely eventually noticed by FSDO staff and they might not understand TABS, if they do reach out to you use that as a chance to educate them/point them at TSO-C199. Or just point them at me, I'm happy to help.

Grr I meant 91.225/227 not 21.blah.

220, 221... Whatever it takes.
Jim

On 3/6/2018 6:29 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
if they do reach out to you use that as a chance to educate them/point them at TSO-C199. Or just point them at me, I'm happy to help.
Who are you Darryl?

We've gotten a lot of good advice and information from you, and that's
much appreciated.Â* So is this a hobby for you or are you with the FAA,
an avionics supplier, consultant on the program, etc.? Your knowledge on
the subject seems vast.

Best,
--
Dan, 5J

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 10:03:49 AM UTC-5, Dan Marotta wrote:
On 3/6/2018 6:29 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
if they do reach out to you use that as a chance to educate them/point them at TSO-C199. Or just point them at me, I'm happy to help.
Who are you Darryl?


http://ssaconvention.org/speakers/darryl-ramm/