![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking at today's forecast for Moriarty, NM, USA for 1300 local time
brings up a question.Â* I've always considered the thermal height, cloud base, etc., to be MSL altitudes.Â* Indeed, looking directly at Moriarty shows 11,500' which is reasonable given the time and date. Moving a bit west, however, to the area of Edgewood, shows a blue blob with an indicated altitude of 2,500'.Â* Now I know Edgewood's elevation to be somewhat above 6,000' MSL.Â* So is there a big hole in the ground that I haven't seen, is the height of thermals in AGL, is there an error in the program, or am I missing something? Inquiring minds and all... -- Dan, 5J |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, 14 September 2019 11:21:50 UTC-3, Dan Marotta wrote:
Looking at today's forecast for Moriarty, NM, USA for 1300 local time brings up a question.Â* I've always considered the thermal height, cloud base, etc., to be MSL altitudes.Â* Indeed, looking directly at Moriarty shows 11,500' which is reasonable given the time and date. Moving a bit west, however, to the area of Edgewood, shows a blue blob with an indicated altitude of 2,500'.Â* Now I know Edgewood's elevation to be somewhat above 6,000' MSL.Â* So is there a big hole in the ground that I haven't seen, is the height of thermals in AGL, is there an error in the program, or am I missing something? Inquiring minds and all... -- Dan, 5J I would suggest directing these types of inquiries to us directly at , preferably with a screenshot. In this case though, I think what you are seeing is an unintended consequence of Height of Thermals being set to 0 rather than terrain height when there are no thermals in a given location. This is intentional so you get nice clear/unfilled holes demarcating areas of no thermals rather than a potentially misleading colour value in areas of high topography. But then in the final stage of rendering there's a small degree of smoothing which is 'smearing' that zero value back to a positive, but below ground value. It probably should know to not smooth zero value areas, that will get fixed at some point. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Skysight Color | Dan Marotta | Soaring | 6 | June 29th 19 02:48 PM |
Skysight Question | Dan Marotta | Soaring | 3 | August 12th 18 01:21 AM |
SeeYou V.9.0 and SkySight | Dan[_6_] | Soaring | 6 | November 8th 17 03:21 PM |
SkySight forecast available for SW USA | JS | Soaring | 16 | April 22nd 17 12:33 PM |
Skysight | Tom Kelley #711 | Soaring | 0 | April 5th 17 07:09 PM |