![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
I am now the owner of a lovely 1973 Grob built Standard Cirrus - a thing of beauty. What intrigues me is that the the glider has no water ballast in the wings and looks as if it came straight from the factory like this. No connector in the wing root and nothing in the cockpit to indicate there was ever water ballast functionality. I always assumed that a run of manufactured gliders such as Std Cirrus would have water ballast in the wings across the whole range, but obviously not. Has anyone else come across this? Very curious. Thanks for any info. All the best Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wikipedia says water ballast came to standard class in '72. Maybe this one was commissioned before the rule was adopted. Alternatively a previous owner may have removed it.
DT |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to my copy of "Segelflugzeuge vom Wolf zum Discus" by Peter Selinger, water ballast tanks were offered as an option by Schempp-Hirth since July 4th 1971. I suppose Grob followed the same policy.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, September 29, 2019 at 5:34:08 PM UTC+2, wrote:
According to my copy of "Segelflugzeuge vom Wolf zum Discus" by Peter Selinger, water ballast tanks were offered as an option by Schempp-Hirth since July 4th 1971. I suppose Grob followed the same policy. My father used to own Std Cirrus #11 - 1969. It was fitted with water ballast. Clinton |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The earli Cirri did not come from the factory with ballast. Many were retrofitted in the field with bags.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:43:16 -0700, Tony wrote:
The earli Cirri did not come from the factory with ballast. Many were retrofitted in the field with bags. Yep. Initial Standard class rules said no water ballast and no retractable landing gear. I don't know whether the rule changes to allow water ballast and retractable gear were simultaneous or not. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, September 30, 2019 at 5:19:18 PM UTC+1, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:43:16 -0700, Tony wrote: The earli Cirri did not come from the factory with ballast. Many were retrofitted in the field with bags. Yep. Initial Standard class rules said no water ballast and no retractable landing gear. I don't know whether the rule changes to allow water ballast and retractable gear were simultaneous or not. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org Many thanks for all your replies. I have contacted Schemp Hirth as well to see if they can shed any information on it. I will post here if I find out any more nuggets of information. All the best Ian |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Cirrus is one of the early ones (1969, s/n 9) and it originally did not have water ballast when delivered. It was added at a later date per a factory supplied mod kit according to the records. This consisted of bags in the wings and dump valve in the lower fuselage. The maximum gross weight was increased from 728 to 860lbs (wet). Unfortunately, the mod was removed long before I acquired the sailplane. It would have been nice to have flown it with water ballast but it does very well without.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jantar Standard 3 water ballast tank repair | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | June 5th 17 12:25 PM |
ASK-21 and Grob 103 cockpit ballast weights | kirk.stant | Soaring | 12 | September 2nd 15 08:57 PM |
water ballast | 6PK | Soaring | 16 | July 15th 15 01:43 PM |
Grob 103 Ballast Weights | Roger Fowler[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | January 16th 12 12:18 PM |
Who first used water ballast and when? | John McCullagh | Soaring | 9 | October 18th 06 09:36 AM |