![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the Aero-News Propwash newsletter this morning:
AOPA Lobbies Congress For Cell Phones In GA Cockpits Aviation Advocacy Group Says The Time Is Now General aviation pilots should be able to use cell phones in the cockpit while they're airborne. And they should be able to do it now. That's what AOPA is telling the Federal Communications Commission. "It's a safety issue," said Randy Kenagy, AOPA senior director of advanced technology. "Cell phones and other wireless technologies are invaluable tools for obtaining updated weather and other information in flight. And the risk of interference with aircraft avionics for the typical general aviation flight is very slight." The FCC is considering changing its rules to allow cell phones (and other wireless devices such as pagers and Blackberries) to be used in the air. Despite the concern in some quarters that cell phones might cause interference with aircraft radios and navigation equipment, the FAA has never prohibited their use. The aviation agency always has given pilots the final authority on what portable electronic devices could be used in the flight. And AOPA talked with several major cell phone service providers and found no restrictions on using their services in GA cockpits. And for GA pilots, the safety and convenience benefits of the wireless devices far outweigh any minimal interference risk. "The majority of general aviation flights are flown under VFR, so there is seldom exclusive reliance on electronic navigation," said Kenagy. "Plus, the pilot isn't isolated from the passengers and has the immediate ability and responsibility to terminate the use of any device at any time if it is interfering with flight-critical electronics." AOPA told the FCC that it strongly supports the rule change and urged the agency to take the regulatory steps to allow the immediate use of cell phones and other wireless devices in airborne aircraft. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know about anyone else, but I can never get a [usable] signal above
2,500 feet agl. Anyone else have a different experience? I have Verizon. Marco Leon "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... From the Aero-News Propwash newsletter this morning: AOPA Lobbies Congress For Cell Phones In GA Cockpits Aviation Advocacy Group Says The Time Is Now General aviation pilots should be able to use cell phones in the cockpit while they're airborne. And they should be able to do it now. That's what AOPA is telling the Federal Communications Commission. "It's a safety issue," said Randy Kenagy, AOPA senior director of advanced technology. "Cell phones and other wireless technologies are invaluable tools for obtaining updated weather and other information in flight. And the risk of interference with aircraft avionics for the typical general aviation flight is very slight." The FCC is considering changing its rules to allow cell phones (and other wireless devices such as pagers and Blackberries) to be used in the air. Despite the concern in some quarters that cell phones might cause interference with aircraft radios and navigation equipment, the FAA has never prohibited their use. The aviation agency always has given pilots the final authority on what portable electronic devices could be used in the flight. And AOPA talked with several major cell phone service providers and found no restrictions on using their services in GA cockpits. And for GA pilots, the safety and convenience benefits of the wireless devices far outweigh any minimal interference risk. "The majority of general aviation flights are flown under VFR, so there is seldom exclusive reliance on electronic navigation," said Kenagy. "Plus, the pilot isn't isolated from the passengers and has the immediate ability and responsibility to terminate the use of any device at any time if it is interfering with flight-critical electronics." AOPA told the FCC that it strongly supports the rule change and urged the agency to take the regulatory steps to allow the immediate use of cell phones and other wireless devices in airborne aircraft. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marco Leon" mmleon(at)yahoo.com wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but I can never get a [usable] signal above 2,500 feet agl. Anyone else have a different experience? I have Verizon. Generally, cell phone towers have the antenna pattern pointing toward the ground, where most of the cell phones are to be found. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marco Leon" wrote in message ...
I don't know about anyone else, but I can never get a [usable] signal above 2,500 feet agl. Anyone else have a different experience? I have Verizon. I've got Verizon also and I usually don't get a usable signal above 400 ft AGL... At 1000 ft, it'll look like I'm getting a signal, but I'll lose it before I've even finished dialing (even with speed dial)... I suspect that the cell tower antennas are oriented more for surface signals instead of ones above them... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Grumman-581" writes:
I've got Verizon also and I usually don't get a usable signal above 400 ft AGL... At 1000 ft, it'll look like I'm getting a signal, but I'll lose it before I've even finished dialing (even with speed dial)... This is what happens with my cell phone (Cingular). The only time it works is when I'm over a fairly remote area but line-of-sight back to civilization or a freeway. I figure that the phone is getting only 1-2 towers and it works....flying over cities it gets too many towers and gives up. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:39:53 GMT, "Grumman-581"
wrote: "Marco Leon" wrote in message ... I don't know about anyone else, but I can never get a [usable] signal above 2,500 feet agl. Anyone else have a different experience? I have Verizon. I've got Verizon also and I usually don't get a usable signal above 400 ft AGL... At 1000 ft, it'll look like I'm getting a signal, but I'll lose it before I've even finished dialing (even with speed dial)... I suspect that the cell tower antennas are oriented more for surface signals instead of ones above them... I once called my wife to tell her that I was feet wet over Great Bay and that she could see me tour the bay if she looked out the window. It was not a great success, but not because the connection failed. I just took off my headset and dialed up, not realizing that all she would hear was the roar of the engine and me shouting in the background. She made the natural conclusion that the plane was going down and I was making my last, 9/11-style call. I was 600-700 feet, I suppose. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have Verizon and always get a signal. In remote areas sometimes I
have to be at 1000 AGL to get a reliable signal. Marco Leon wrote: I don't know about anyone else, but I can never get a [usable] signal above 2,500 feet agl. Anyone else have a different experience? I have Verizon. Marco Leon "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... From the Aero-News Propwash newsletter this morning: AOPA Lobbies Congress For Cell Phones In GA Cockpits Aviation Advocacy Group Says The Time Is Now General aviation pilots should be able to use cell phones in the cockpit while they're airborne. And they should be able to do it now. That's what AOPA is telling the Federal Communications Commission. "It's a safety issue," said Randy Kenagy, AOPA senior director of advanced technology. "Cell phones and other wireless technologies are invaluable tools for obtaining updated weather and other information in flight. And the risk of interference with aircraft avionics for the typical general aviation flight is very slight." The FCC is considering changing its rules to allow cell phones (and other wireless devices such as pagers and Blackberries) to be used in the air. Despite the concern in some quarters that cell phones might cause interference with aircraft radios and navigation equipment, the FAA has never prohibited their use. The aviation agency always has given pilots the final authority on what portable electronic devices could be used in the flight. And AOPA talked with several major cell phone service providers and found no restrictions on using their services in GA cockpits. And for GA pilots, the safety and convenience benefits of the wireless devices far outweigh any minimal interference risk. "The majority of general aviation flights are flown under VFR, so there is seldom exclusive reliance on electronic navigation," said Kenagy. "Plus, the pilot isn't isolated from the passengers and has the immediate ability and responsibility to terminate the use of any device at any time if it is interfering with flight-critical electronics." AOPA told the FCC that it strongly supports the rule change and urged the agency to take the regulatory steps to allow the immediate use of cell phones and other wireless devices in airborne aircraft. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back in the old days with the analog bag phones, I seem to remember
being able to get a signal while in the air. These days, with the digital phones, that doesn't seem to be the case. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver reported:
From the Aero-News Propwash newsletter this morning: General aviation pilots should be able to use cell phones in the cockpit while they're airborne. And they should be able to do it now. That's what AOPA is telling the Federal Communications Commission. I can imagine the FCC reply. "We *know* you want to use cell phones in the air. That's why we wrote a law against it." George Patterson Whosoever bloweth not his own horn, the same shall remain unblown. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:49:56 GMT, George Patterson
wrote: I can imagine the FCC reply. "We *know* you want to use cell phones in the air. That's why we wrote a law against it." Well, I suppose the FCC can write a law if it wants to, but only Congress can pass one. I don't believe there is any law against using a cell phone in the air, though there may indeed be an FCC regulation. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |