![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The regs say you must communicate, have permission, a clearance, have a
transponder, etc to fly in any Class B/C/D Airspace. The airspace is generally defined by the airport reference point altitude and location on the field. For example the definitions state "from the surface to..." What requirements are there for flying BELOW the airport surface? I know several airports with the requisite airspace that are located above surrounding terrain where it would be possible to fly below the airport surface. What say the group? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What requirements are there for flying BELOW the airport surface?
A propeller strong enough to dig through the asphalt? "john smith" wrote in message ... The regs say you must communicate, have permission, a clearance, have a transponder, etc to fly in any Class B/C/D Airspace. The airspace is generally defined by the airport reference point altitude and location on the field. For example the definitions state "from the surface to..." What requirements are there for flying BELOW the airport surface? I know several airports with the requisite airspace that are located above surrounding terrain where it would be possible to fly below the airport surface. What say the group? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message ... The regs say you must communicate, have permission, a clearance, have a transponder, etc to fly in any Class B/C/D Airspace. What requirements are there for flying BELOW the airport surface? What say the group? To fly BELOW the airport surface is never recommended. Cumulo granite could ruin your day ![]() I fly out of an airport that is near a Class C with a bottom of 1400....just stay below that and there's not a problem. Further down the road is a conglomeration of airspace, but if I stay above 1100, but below 1800.....you get the picture. This technique is probably more trouble than would be worth to plan if you were just passing through, but for the local folks it works well. Later, Stephen Foley, Alabama |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:27:47 -0500, "Hotel 179"
wrote: To fly BELOW the airport surface is never recommended. Cumulo granite could ruin your day ![]() Lebanon NH airport is located on a ridge or butte. It would indeed be possible to fly below the RUNWAY surface, but of course that's not what the Class D requirement suggests. It extends from the surface of the ground at any point to 2,500 feet (whatever) above that surface. So I reckon that in the case of Lebanon, the top of the Class D tuna can would be rippled: higher where the airport itself is situatated. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:27:47 -0500, "Hotel 179" wrote: To fly BELOW the airport surface is never recommended. Cumulo granite could ruin your day ![]() Lebanon NH airport is located on a ridge or butte. It would indeed be possible to fly below the RUNWAY surface, Or at least below the altitude of the runway surface.g You can also fly below the altitude of the Leadville runway surface. The only question is how close a proximity you are to said runway. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cub Driver" wrote in message
... [...] So I reckon that in the case of Lebanon, the top of the Class D tuna can would be rippled: higher where the airport itself is situatated. The airspace is not "rippled". The maximum elevation is generally 2500 feet above the *airport*, even as the airspace itself extends to the surface, wherever that surface may lie. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:24:21 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: The airspace is not "rippled". The maximum elevation is generally 2500 feet above the *airport*, even as the airspace itself extends to the surface, wherever that surface may lie. Point taken. I will remember that, the next time I am coasting over the Delta airspace. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have just the situation you describe at Seattle-Tacoma Airport...it sits
on high ground adjacent to Puget Sound. On the sectional, just west of the "all the way to the ground" portion of the Class B, there is a blue square with "-30" in it, and the legend says "Minus ceiling value indicates surface up to but not including that value." The surface it refers to is the water. Ergo, the Class B goes all the way to the water, and you can't fly past SEA at 500 feet above the water without a Class B clearance. Paine Field's Class D does not have a similar graphic, but its airspace extends over Puget Sound and I'm guessing that the same reasoning applies. Note that AIM 3-2-5 says that Class D "generally extends from the surface to 2500 feet above airport elevation," thus making a distinction between the surface and field elevation. Bob Gardner "john smith" wrote in message ... The regs say you must communicate, have permission, a clearance, have a transponder, etc to fly in any Class B/C/D Airspace. The airspace is generally defined by the airport reference point altitude and location on the field. For example the definitions state "from the surface to..." What requirements are there for flying BELOW the airport surface? I know several airports with the requisite airspace that are located above surrounding terrain where it would be possible to fly below the airport surface. What say the group? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:51:59 -0700, "Bob Gardner"
wrote: Note that AIM 3-2-5 says that Class D "generally extends from the surface to 2500 feet above airport elevation," thus making a distinction between the surface and field elevation. Ah! Okay, scratch my presumption that the roof of the Delta airspace might be rippled ![]() -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming you mean 'below the airspace'
Well, for one... there's the mode C veil. 30 miles from the primary airport located in class bravo, mode C transponders are required and must be transmitting altitude data. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does USA need a Club Class? | MC | Soaring | 42 | April 7th 05 08:07 PM |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Meigs Class D Airspace | Defly | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | July 19th 04 02:53 PM |
Tower with only Class G Airspace | Jeff Saylor | Piloting | 8 | May 10th 04 09:53 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |