![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've read several reports online re the Air France crash at Toronto
that there were thunderstorms in the vicinity (one account said "right over the airport") If so I'm curious why the captain didn't divert or hold away from the storm until it passed (fuel status?). If there was a storm nearby that could have caused massive wind shear and been the reason for the jet going off the runway(?) It'll probably take Transport Canada a while to investigate, but I wonder what consequences this may have for the crew. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He reportedly aborted one landing attempt due to winds, then went
around for another try. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If so I'm curious why the captain didn't divert or
hold away from the storm until it passed (fuel status?). If there was a storm nearby that could have caused massive wind shear and been the reason for the jet going off the runway(?) It'll probably take Transport Canada a while to investigate, but I wonder what consequences this may have for the crew. I think it's pretty unlikely that the crew will be sanctioned for deciding to attempt a landing. If you listen to the liveATC feed of the Toronto approach control - http://www.liveatc.net/.archive/cyyz...02-05-1530.mp3 (start at the 23 minute mark) you'll see that the weather appeared to be letting up. At one point the controller tells another pilot that people have been landing at Toronto "for the last hour or so," and also there are aircraft cleared for the ILS approach directly before and after the Air France flight. To me it sounds like by the time the accident occured an almost normal flow of traffic into the airport had resumed. - Ray |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... I've read several reports online re the Air France crash at Toronto that there were thunderstorms in the vicinity (one account said "right over the airport") If so I'm curious why the captain didn't divert or hold away from the storm until it passed (fuel status?). If there was a storm nearby that could have caused massive wind shear and been the reason for the jet going off the runway(?) It'll probably take Transport Canada a while to investigate, but I wonder what consequences this may have for the crew. According to the BBC, the President of Air France stated in a press statement that "Flight 358 was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to poor weather conditions". This is a false statement. I have heard the recording the of the Toronto ATC at the time, and there were no plans to close the airport before the crash of AF 358. In fact, two aircraft had been cleared to land behind AF 358, and their clearance was cancelled due to the crash of AF358. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Epstein wrote:
According to the BBC, the President of Air France stated in a press statement that "Flight 358 was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to poor weather conditions". The Airbus was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to rescue operations on and near the runway. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ye
"Peter R." wrote in message ... Tim Epstein wrote: According to the BBC, the President of Air France stated in a press statement that "Flight 358 was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to poor weather conditions". The Airbus was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to rescue operations on and near the runway. Yep, but that's not what the Air France cheif said. His implication was that this accident was really bad luck, and that the airport was about to be closed anyway, and that the accident flight just happend to be the last flight in before the airport was closed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Epstein wrote:
"Peter R." wrote in message ... Tim Epstein wrote: According to the BBC, the President of Air France stated in a press statement that "Flight 358 was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to poor weather conditions". The Airbus was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to rescue operations on and near the runway. Yep, but that's not what the Air France cheif said. His implication was that this accident was really bad luck, and that the airport was about to be closed anyway, and that the accident flight just happend to be the last flight in before the airport was closed. Sorry, I was attempting to make a joke. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sorry Peter - one of my humor magnetos failed...
"Peter R." wrote in message ... Tim Epstein wrote: "Peter R." wrote in message ... Tim Epstein wrote: According to the BBC, the President of Air France stated in a press statement that "Flight 358 was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to poor weather conditions". The Airbus was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to rescue operations on and near the runway. Yep, but that's not what the Air France cheif said. His implication was that this accident was really bad luck, and that the airport was about to be closed anyway, and that the accident flight just happend to be the last flight in before the airport was closed. Sorry, I was attempting to make a joke. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Epstein wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... I've read several reports online re the Air France crash at Toronto that there were thunderstorms in the vicinity (one account said "right over the airport") If so I'm curious why the captain didn't divert or hold away from the storm until it passed (fuel status?). If there was a storm nearby that could have caused massive wind shear and been the reason for the jet going off the runway(?) It'll probably take Transport Canada a while to investigate, but I wonder what consequences this may have for the crew. According to the BBC, the President of Air France stated in a press statement that "Flight 358 was the last aircraft to land before the airport was closed due to poor weather conditions". This is a false statement. I have heard the recording the of the Toronto ATC at the time, and there were no plans to close the airport before the crash of AF 358. In fact, two aircraft had been cleared to land behind AF 358, and their clearance was cancelled due to the crash of AF358. Well, if you consider the smoke from the fire as weather... :-) Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soaring near Paris, France (Not Texas :-) | [email protected] | Soaring | 17 | November 13th 04 06:39 PM |
News from France | HECTOP | Piloting | 12 | April 1st 04 01:16 AM |
Russia joins France and Germany | captain! | Military Aviation | 12 | September 9th 03 09:56 AM |
France Bans the Term 'E-Mail' | bsh | Military Aviation | 38 | July 26th 03 03:18 PM |
"France downplays jet swap with Russia" | Mike | Military Aviation | 8 | July 21st 03 05:46 AM |