![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well, the numbers are starting to rub off my pretty new airplane
drivers license. anyone know if it's ok if i just make a nice copy and carry that or do i have to have the original card in my possession on a ramp check. dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see some of mine are getting rubbed off too...guess my wallet's gonna get
thicker... photocopy the plastic ones, laminate both the plastic and the photo copies. Jim "houstondan" wrote in message oups.com... well, the numbers are starting to rub off my pretty new airplane drivers license. anyone know if it's ok if i just make a nice copy and carry that or do i have to have the original card in my possession on a ramp check. dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"houstondan" wrote in message
oups.com... well, the numbers are starting to rub off my pretty new airplane drivers license. anyone know if it's ok if i just make a nice copy and carry that or do i have to have the original card in my possession on a ramp check. FAR 61.3a1 requires you to have the certificate itself in your physical possession. The print began rubbing off mine, too, after just a few months (whereas my driver's license is still perfectly legible after five years). The name and number on mine are still intact, though. You can request a replacement certificate online at http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certific...e_replacement/. They charge $2, but I would refuse to pay the fee if the original license is defective. --Gary |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
gary...thanks for the useful info. i'm in the fed site so i'll get
registered, get the new card, copy it, have it laminated, hide the old one just in case since they say they will not issue more than one replacment. i guess if your wallet gets stolen twice you're not a pilot anymore? as to standing on the principle and protesting the 2$ by standing outside crawford...no, holdit...that's another protest...i think i'll pass. the federal government is pretty immune to protests on principle. dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"houstondan" wrote in message
oups.com... gary...thanks for the useful info. i'm in the fed site so i'll get registered, get the new card, copy it, have it laminated, hide the old one just in case since they say they will not issue more than one replacment. i guess if your wallet gets stolen twice you're not a pilot anymore? Do you mean the part where they say "We can only issue one copy of each certificate"? I assumed they just meant one at a time. --Gary |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gary Drescher wrote: "houstondan" wrote in message oups.com... gary...thanks for the useful info. i'm in the fed site so i'll get registered, get the new card, copy it, have it laminated, hide the old one just in case since they say they will not issue more than one replacment. i guess if your wallet gets stolen twice you're not a pilot anymore? Do you mean the part where they say "We can only issue one copy of each certificate"? I assumed they just meant one at a time. --Gary the writer of that sentence probably meant that but do you think a federal beaurocrat would make that assumption or would they more likely just read the literal reg and refuse to issue another copy if the file/computer shows you've already gotten one? dan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"houstondan" wrote in message
oups.com... Gary Drescher wrote: "houstondan" wrote in message oups.com... gary...thanks for the useful info. i'm in the fed site so i'll get registered, get the new card, copy it, have it laminated, hide the old one just in case since they say they will not issue more than one replacment. i guess if your wallet gets stolen twice you're not a pilot anymore? Do you mean the part where they say "We can only issue one copy of each certificate"? I assumed they just meant one at a time. --Gary the writer of that sentence probably meant that but do you think a federal beaurocrat would make that assumption or would they more likely just read the literal reg and refuse to issue another copy if the file/computer shows you've already gotten one? The web page in question is directed at the general public. The bureaucrat who issues the certificates probably sees a much different document. In any case, out of 600,000 US pilots, there have surely been some who lost their physical certificates multiple times. If they'd been denied replacements, we'd probably have heard about it. --Gary |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A copy is fine.
houstondan wrote: well, the numbers are starting to rub off my pretty new airplane drivers license. anyone know if it's ok if i just make a nice copy and carry that or do i have to have the original card in my possession on a ramp check. dan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps" wrote in message
... houstondan wrote: well, the numbers are starting to rub off my pretty new airplane drivers license. anyone know if it's ok if i just make a nice copy and carry that or do i have to have the original card in my possession on a ramp check. A copy is fine. How do you reconcile that claim with 61.3a1? --Gary |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The hell you say. Spend the $3, get a fresh copy, and have it laminated at
an insty-print store. A copy is fine. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted: copy of Flying Buyers' Guide 1983 or older | Ren? | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 14th 05 06:06 AM |
The Vanishing Honorable Discharge | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 29th 04 02:58 AM |
WTB: Copy of book "Sailplanes by Schweizer" | Stan Amyett | Soaring | 2 | June 16th 04 09:00 PM |
Soft copy of CAR 3 and Part 23 wanted | dave | Owning | 3 | April 16th 04 04:54 AM |
FS: Aviation History Books | Neil Cournoyer | Military Aviation | 0 | August 26th 03 08:32 PM |