A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Turbo Lance II opinions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 05, 10:39 PM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Turbo Lance II opinions

Hello,

I'm looking to talk with someone who's owned a Turbo Lance for their
opinions on ownership and maintenance.

Thanks.



  #2  
Old August 21st 05, 01:55 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin for
my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility. It was
a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo airplanes. I
found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my expectations. Mine had
most of the availible speed mods and an intercooler which I recommend. I
only had if for about 16 months so I can't tell you what the long term cost
of ownership would be.

Mike
MU-2


"John Doe" wrote in message
k.net...
Hello,

I'm looking to talk with someone who's owned a Turbo Lance for their
opinions on ownership and maintenance.

Thanks.





  #3  
Old August 21st 05, 03:30 PM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin
for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility.
It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo
airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my
expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an
intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I
can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be.

Mike
MU-2



With all that being said, why did you sell it so fast?



  #4  
Old August 22nd 05, 02:14 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Doe" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin
for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility.
It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo
airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my
expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an
intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I
can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be.

Mike
MU-2



With all that being said, why did you sell it so fast?


I needed an airplane that could cross the Sierra in virtually any weather so
I needed deice and radar. I was making flights where I had to be at the
destination.

Mike
MU-2


  #5  
Old August 21st 05, 03:38 PM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin
for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility.
It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo
airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my
expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an
intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I
can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be.

Mike
MU-2


I must admit that I'm not very smart on the turbo options. This would be my
first turbo engine.

I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that
specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate
options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at
just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler.

Thanks.


  #6  
Old August 21st 05, 03:38 PM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin
for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility.
It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo
airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my
expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an
intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I
can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be.

Mike
MU-2


I must admit that I'm not very smart on the turbo options. This would be my
first turbo engine.

I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that
specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate
options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at
just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler.

Thanks.



  #7  
Old August 22nd 05, 02:17 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Doe" wrote in message
news

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin
for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility.
It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo
airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my
expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an
intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I
can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be.

Mike
MU-2


I must admit that I'm not very smart on the turbo options. This would be
my
first turbo engine.

I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that
specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate
options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at
just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler.

Thanks.



The intercooler is a aftermarket STC'd modification. Without it, the
airplane will not be able to maintain high power settings above about
16,000' without overheating.

Mike
MU-2


  #8  
Old August 22nd 05, 03:39 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that
specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate
options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at
just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler.


The intercooler is a aftermarket STC'd modification. Without it, the
airplane will not be able to maintain high power settings above about
16,000' without overheating.


An intercooler is a radiator that cools a gas (air) instead of a liquid.
When air is compressed (what a turbocharger does) it heats up. When a
gas is heated it wants to expand (return to an uncompressed state), so
you place an intercooler (or two) inline following the turbocharger and
before the engine air intake, to cool the heated, compressed air before
it enters the engine, providing cooler, more dense air to the engine.
Cooler dense air can absorb more heat than hotter dense air and provide
greater expansion and therefore more power.
  #9  
Old August 22nd 05, 04:55 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"john smith" wrote in message
.. .
I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that
specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate
options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at
just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler.


The intercooler is a aftermarket STC'd modification. Without it, the
airplane will not be able to maintain high power settings above about
16,000' without overheating.


An intercooler is a radiator that cools a gas (air) instead of a liquid.
When air is compressed (what a turbocharger does) it heats up. When a gas
is heated it wants to expand (return to an uncompressed state), so you
place an intercooler (or two) inline following the turbocharger and before
the engine air intake, to cool the heated, compressed air before it enters
the engine, providing cooler, more dense air to the engine.
Cooler dense air can absorb more heat than hotter dense air and provide
greater expansion and therefore more power.


Or it can provide the same power with all the temperatures being lower
(inlet, combustion, EGT, TIT).

Mike
MU-2


  #10  
Old August 22nd 05, 11:59 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:39:32 GMT, john smith wrote:

snip

An intercooler is a radiator that cools a gas (air) instead of a liquid.
When air is compressed (what a turbocharger does) it heats up. When a
gas is heated it wants to expand (return to an uncompressed state), so
you place an intercooler (or two) inline following the turbocharger and
before the engine air intake, to cool the heated, compressed air before
it enters the engine, providing cooler, more dense air to the engine.
Cooler dense air can absorb more heat than hotter dense air and provide
greater expansion and therefore more power.


Technically, an intercooler is a "radiator" placed between a
exhaust-driven turbine compressor and a mechanically-driven turbine
compressor (a la B-17). Your description of an aftercooler is spot-on.

You may not be familiar with the Turbo Lance/'Toga "intercooler"
installation. It is a relatively inefficient aftercooler installation
that has other very important benefits.

It changes the existing lower cowl design from a single common air
inlet which is shared between updraft cylinder cooling, induction air
supply, and oil cooling air cupply. The new lower cowl has separate
inlets for updraft cylinder cooling, induction air, and oil cooling,
as well as the aftercooler inlet.

Unfortunately, the outlet of the aftercooler heat exchanger is
exhausted into the pressure area for the updraft cylinder cooling.

The installation will drop operating CHT by approximately 40-60
degrees F, and operating oil temp by 20-40 degrees. Considering that
CHT can run 450 F and oil temp 220+F this is a very good thing.

I honestly cannot recall the typical induction air temp drop, but the
overall package works quite well. IMHO this is as much a result of
improved engine/oil cooling air flow as actual induction air cooling.

Personally, I would not consider operating a Turbo 'Toga/Lance without
this modification.

Regards;

TC
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why turbo normalizer? Robert M. Gary Piloting 61 May 20th 05 04:33 PM
Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? frank may Military Aviation 11 September 5th 04 02:51 PM
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 john szpara Owning 55 April 2nd 04 09:08 PM
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION ArtKramr Military Aviation 4 January 7th 04 10:43 PM
Piper Lance Renee Purner Owning 22 November 4th 03 07:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.