![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I'm looking to talk with someone who's owned a Turbo Lance for their opinions on ownership and maintenance. Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin for
my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility. It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be. Mike MU-2 "John Doe" wrote in message k.net... Hello, I'm looking to talk with someone who's owned a Turbo Lance for their opinions on ownership and maintenance. Thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility. It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be. Mike MU-2 With all that being said, why did you sell it so fast? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Doe" wrote in message ink.net... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility. It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be. Mike MU-2 With all that being said, why did you sell it so fast? I needed an airplane that could cross the Sierra in virtually any weather so I needed deice and radar. I was making flights where I had to be at the destination. Mike MU-2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility. It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be. Mike MU-2 I must admit that I'm not very smart on the turbo options. This would be my first turbo engine. I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler. Thanks. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility. It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be. Mike MU-2 I must admit that I'm not very smart on the turbo options. This would be my first turbo engine. I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler. Thanks. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Doe" wrote in message news ![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... My first airplane was a 79 Turbo Lance. I bought it for the roomy cabin for my dogs, reasonably fast cruise and fairly good altitude capibility. It was a releative bargin compared to other six place, 170+kt, turbo airplanes. I found it to be a good airplane for me and it met my expectations. Mine had most of the availible speed mods and an intercooler which I recommend. I only had if for about 16 months so I can't tell you what the long term cost of ownership would be. Mike MU-2 I must admit that I'm not very smart on the turbo options. This would be my first turbo engine. I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler. Thanks. The intercooler is a aftermarket STC'd modification. Without it, the airplane will not be able to maintain high power settings above about 16,000' without overheating. Mike MU-2 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that
specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler. The intercooler is a aftermarket STC'd modification. Without it, the airplane will not be able to maintain high power settings above about 16,000' without overheating. An intercooler is a radiator that cools a gas (air) instead of a liquid. When air is compressed (what a turbocharger does) it heats up. When a gas is heated it wants to expand (return to an uncompressed state), so you place an intercooler (or two) inline following the turbocharger and before the engine air intake, to cool the heated, compressed air before it enters the engine, providing cooler, more dense air to the engine. Cooler dense air can absorb more heat than hotter dense air and provide greater expansion and therefore more power. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message .. . I've seen some Lance's advertised with Turbo and then there are some that specifically advertise Turbo with Intercooler. Are these two seperate options available or are they one in the same? The Lance I'm looking at just says Turbo in the ad and doesn't mention any intercooler. The intercooler is a aftermarket STC'd modification. Without it, the airplane will not be able to maintain high power settings above about 16,000' without overheating. An intercooler is a radiator that cools a gas (air) instead of a liquid. When air is compressed (what a turbocharger does) it heats up. When a gas is heated it wants to expand (return to an uncompressed state), so you place an intercooler (or two) inline following the turbocharger and before the engine air intake, to cool the heated, compressed air before it enters the engine, providing cooler, more dense air to the engine. Cooler dense air can absorb more heat than hotter dense air and provide greater expansion and therefore more power. Or it can provide the same power with all the temperatures being lower (inlet, combustion, EGT, TIT). Mike MU-2 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:39:32 GMT, john smith wrote:
snip An intercooler is a radiator that cools a gas (air) instead of a liquid. When air is compressed (what a turbocharger does) it heats up. When a gas is heated it wants to expand (return to an uncompressed state), so you place an intercooler (or two) inline following the turbocharger and before the engine air intake, to cool the heated, compressed air before it enters the engine, providing cooler, more dense air to the engine. Cooler dense air can absorb more heat than hotter dense air and provide greater expansion and therefore more power. Technically, an intercooler is a "radiator" placed between a exhaust-driven turbine compressor and a mechanically-driven turbine compressor (a la B-17). Your description of an aftercooler is spot-on. You may not be familiar with the Turbo Lance/'Toga "intercooler" installation. It is a relatively inefficient aftercooler installation that has other very important benefits. It changes the existing lower cowl design from a single common air inlet which is shared between updraft cylinder cooling, induction air supply, and oil cooling air cupply. The new lower cowl has separate inlets for updraft cylinder cooling, induction air, and oil cooling, as well as the aftercooler inlet. Unfortunately, the outlet of the aftercooler heat exchanger is exhausted into the pressure area for the updraft cylinder cooling. The installation will drop operating CHT by approximately 40-60 degrees F, and operating oil temp by 20-40 degrees. Considering that CHT can run 450 F and oil temp 220+F this is a very good thing. I honestly cannot recall the typical induction air temp drop, but the overall package works quite well. IMHO this is as much a result of improved engine/oil cooling air flow as actual induction air cooling. Personally, I would not consider operating a Turbo 'Toga/Lance without this modification. Regards; TC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why turbo normalizer? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 61 | May 20th 05 04:33 PM |
Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? | frank may | Military Aviation | 11 | September 5th 04 02:51 PM |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Piper Lance | Renee Purner | Owning | 22 | November 4th 03 07:47 PM |