![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings,
The subject pretty much says it all. I'm looking to hear from those who are flying a 3300 Jabiru engine. I've heard that there were some problems in the early days, but I was told that since about 2002, the engines have been working very well, with no problems. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Again, I'm most interested in first hand info, from people who are actually flying the engine. Thanks, Rusty |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know, but what does it do a Corvair doesn't, at a far more
rational price? If it were ATC'd and STC'd to replace say an O-200 or similar it would be worth looking at.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let's please stick to the original question.
Rusty "Bret Ludwig" wrote in message oups.com... I don't know, but what does it do a Corvair doesn't, at a far more rational price? If it were ATC'd and STC'd to replace say an O-200 or similar it would be worth looking at.... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Russell Duffy" wrote in message . .. Let's please stick to the original question. Getting an attitude is sure to get you more answers. Not. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Getting an attitude is sure to get you more answers. Not.
Obviously you don't have any relevant info. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not first hand........But one of the local guys converted his Q-2 from
the VW to the Jabiru 3300 and just loves it. Had a problem with one of the exhaust valves at around 50 hours - IIRC - fixed under warranty and reported to be nearing 500 hours. I think they look a bit fragile, but "cute". His results seem to be proving my impression wrong. His reported performance numbers are better than some O-200 powered versions. ============== Leon McAtee |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Leon,
Not first hand, but full credit nevertheless :-) To have 500 hours, it's likely to be one of the older engines. I never heard what the problems used to be, but knew were were some. Great to hear it's working well now. Rusty wrote in message oups.com... Not first hand........But one of the local guys converted his Q-2 from the VW to the Jabiru 3300 and just loves it. Had a problem with one of the exhaust valves at around 50 hours - IIRC - fixed under warranty and reported to be nearing 500 hours. I think they look a bit fragile, but "cute". His results seem to be proving my impression wrong. His reported performance numbers are better than some O-200 powered versions. ============== Leon McAtee |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Russell Duffy" wrote in message .. . Greetings, The subject pretty much says it all. I'm looking to hear from those who are flying a 3300 Jabiru engine. I've heard that there were some problems in the early days, but I was told that since about 2002, the engines have been working very well, with no problems. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Again, I'm most interested in first hand info, from people who are actually flying the engine. Thanks, Rusty I have an acquaintance who has the 3300 on his Sonex. He has approximately 100 trouble-free hours on it. On the other hand, he installed an Aero-Carb on it, and had lots 'o problems with it before he repaced it with the stock carb... You might try googling the Sonex board. I'd guess it probably has the easiest to corral group of 3300 flyers. You may have to join to browse the messages. KB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Kyle,
I've looked all through the Sonex archives, and just can't find anyone complaining. By all accounts, the more recent engines are just dandy, but I wanted to ask here to see if there was something I was missing. I actually like the AeroCarb, but know they had some sticking problems with them. Thanks, Rusty "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... I have an acquaintance who has the 3300 on his Sonex. He has approximately 100 trouble-free hours on it. On the other hand, he installed an Aero-Carb on it, and had lots 'o problems with it before he repaced it with the stock carb... You might try googling the Sonex board. I'd guess it probably has the easiest to corral group of 3300 flyers. You may have to join to browse the messages. KB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Russell Duffy" wrote in message .. . Hi Kyle, I've looked all through the Sonex archives, and just can't find anyone complaining. By all accounts, the more recent engines are just dandy, but I wanted to ask here to see if there was something I was missing. I actually like the AeroCarb, but know they had some sticking problems with them. Thanks, Rusty Yep, there is a sticking problem. My buddy, who worked in aerospace, and presumably knows what he's doing, couldn't get it to work reliably. Reliability is the name of the game in aviation, so the AeroCarb became a doorstop. KB |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 04:15 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Piloting | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |