![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings,
I looking at a Lancair ES kit plane. I know the plane is high performance (210 or 310 hp engines) but is it also complex? The plane has fixed landing gear, standard or slotted flaps and a constant speed prop.. The real question boils down to this, does a plane have to have all three elements (flaps, retractable landing gear AND a constant speed prop.) or if it has just one (retractable langing gear OR a constant speed prop.), does that make it complex? I searched the group(s) and everyone has an opinion but nobody seems to have a definition for "complex" that gives a yes or no answer to the question of "is this a complex aircraft" Hopefully I'm not looking for a simplex answer to an infinitely difficult question. Thanks in advance, David. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
does a plane have to have
all three elements (flaps, retractable landing gear AND a constant speed prop.) or if it has just one (retractable langing gear OR a constant speed prop.), does that make it complex? 61.31 (e) (1) ....and... You need all three for it to be complex. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:19:40 GMT, Jose
wrote: does a plane have to have all three elements (flaps, retractable landing gear AND a constant speed prop.) or if it has just one (retractable langing gear OR a constant speed prop.), does that make it complex? 61.31 (e) (1) ...and... You need all three for it to be complex. Wasn't that changed in the not too distant past? Seems like when I started flying it only took two of the three. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Jose |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need all three for it to be complex.
Wasn't that changed in the not too distant past? I meant three wheels. Not three wiggles. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I meant three wheels. Not three wiggles.
That is to say (sheesh, doesn't Jose snip properly!)... You need all three wiggles, but only one wheel needs to wiggle. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:42:01 GMT, Jose
wrote: You need all three for it to be complex. Wasn't that changed in the not too distant past? I meant three wheels. Not three wiggles. I meant Constant speed prop, Electric flaps, and retract.:-)) Didn't it used to be only two of the three required for complex? Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Jose |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I meant Constant speed prop, Electric flaps, and retract.:-))
Didn't it used to be only two of the three required for complex? For seaplanes, retractable gear is not necessary. However as long as I remember it was all three wiggles for land planes. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvain
Comment???? If you just retracted the nose gear like a Vari-eze would that meet the requirements for a retractable gear? Big John `````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````` On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:41:45 -0800, Sylvain wrote: wrote: I searched the group(s) and everyone has an opinion but nobody seems to have a definition for "complex" that gives a yes or no answer to the question of "is this a complex aircraft" don't search the newsgroups, but look at the regulations; in particular 14 CFR 61.31(e)(1); it has to have a retractable landing gear, flaps and controllable pitch propeller except in the case of a seaplane (where only flaps and a controllable pitch propeller); so the aircraft you described is not complex. to tie this one into other discussions in this newsgroup, always refer to the scriptures! --Sylvain |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you just retracted the nose gear like a Vari-eze would that meet
the requirements for a retractable gear? I would say yes. The requirements say retractable gear; they do not say the absence of fixed gear. And as for "things that wiggle that the pilot has to keep track of", one is as good as three. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
Navy sues man for plane he recovered in swamp | marc | Owning | 6 | March 29th 04 12:06 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |