A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 18th 05, 05:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX

In the summer taking off from LAX for JFK a sign at the end of the
runway or thereabouts read no turns until over the water. Why is this
sign necessary for pilots? Don't they know that already?
An interested passenger

  #2  
Old December 18th 05, 05:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX

Just a guess, a local noise abatement rule.



wrote in message
ups.com...
| In the summer taking off from LAX for JFK a sign at the
end of the
| runway or thereabouts read no turns until over the water.
Why is this
| sign necessary for pilots? Don't they know that already?
| An interested passenger
|


  #3  
Old December 18th 05, 06:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX

Google for "LAX noise abatement" returned this
http://www.lawa.org/airops/pdf/Secti..._Abatement.pdf

c. Unless specifically instructed otherwise by ATC, pilots
of all aircraft

departing toward the west shall, in accordance with
Subsection 4,

maintain runway heading until past the shoreline before

commencing any turns.



Good guess




--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P


"Jim Macklin" wrote
in message news:8jhpf.29494$QW2.4566@dukeread08...
| Just a guess, a local noise abatement rule.
|
|
|
| wrote in message
|
ups.com...
|| In the summer taking off from LAX for JFK a sign at the
| end of the
|| runway or thereabouts read no turns until over the water.
| Why is this
|| sign necessary for pilots? Don't they know that already?
|| An interested passenger
||
|
|


  #4  
Old December 18th 05, 05:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX

In article . com,
" wrote:

In the summer taking off from LAX for JFK a sign at the end of the
runway or thereabouts read no turns until over the water. Why is this
sign necessary for pilots? Don't they know that already?


Apparently not.

rg
  #5  
Old December 18th 05, 06:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX


wrote in message

In the summer taking off from LAX for JFK a sign at the end of the
runway or thereabouts read no turns until over the water. Why is this
sign necessary for pilots? Don't they know that already?


Probably, but it is just a reminder about procedure. You're not supposed to
take off with flaps up, or with slush on the wings, either, but there are
reminders about those things too.


  #6  
Old December 18th 05, 06:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
. ..

wrote in message

In the summer taking off from LAX for JFK a sign at the end of the
runway or thereabouts read no turns until over the water. Why is this
sign necessary for pilots? Don't they know that already?


Probably, but it is just a reminder about procedure. You're not supposed
to take off with flaps up, or with slush on the wings, either, but there
are reminders about those things too.


You are not supposed to take off with flaps up? Thats news to me.


  #7  
Old December 18th 05, 08:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX


"Nasir" wrote in message news:8Yhpf.42998

You are not supposed to take off with flaps up? Thats news to me.


Sorry, I left the statement incomplete. I presumed understanding of the
conversation in context on the part of readers. My mistake, apparently. To
be totally accurate, politically correct, and free of liability, I suppose
my statement should have read "You're not supposed to take off with flaps
up in most large turbojet or turboprop powered transport aircraft, or in
many transport or non-transport aircraft of any power type, or in any other
size or type of aircraft where trailing edge flaps are installed and where a
prohibition against such operating configuration is contained in the POH,
Operating Certificate, or other applicable documentation." Does that help
to clarify things?


  #8  
Old December 19th 05, 04:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Nasir" wrote in message news:8Yhpf.42998

You are not supposed to take off with flaps up? Thats news to me.


Sorry, I left the statement incomplete. I presumed understanding of the
conversation in context on the part of readers. My mistake, apparently.
To be totally accurate, politically correct, and free of liability, I
suppose my statement should have read "You're not supposed to take off
with flaps up in most large turbojet or turboprop powered transport
aircraft, or in many transport or non-transport aircraft of any power
type, or in any other size or type of aircraft where trailing edge flaps
are installed and where a prohibition against such operating configuration
is contained in the POH, Operating Certificate, or other applicable
documentation." Does that help to clarify things?


Don't typically find a lot of need for flaps on the ol' 172 on TO.

----------------------------------------------
DW


  #9  
Old December 19th 05, 04:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX


"Darkwing" theducksmailATyahoo.com wrote in message


Don't typically find a lot of need for flaps on the ol' 172 on TO.


Very true, but you also don't find many of "the ol' 172s" departing LAX for
JFK, either. The context of the OP was clearly a transport aircraft, and
that's the context I kept in my response. I apologize to any light plane
pilots who may have felt demeaned or left out by the construction of my
reply. In future, I suggest you check context, and don't read anything not
pertaining to light aircraft, thus avoiding these horrible feelings.
Sheesh.


  #10  
Old December 19th 05, 10:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Meaning of sign at end of runway at LAX

Darkwing theducksmailATyahoo.com wrote:

Don't typically find a lot of need for flaps on the ol' 172 on TO.


Especially in "high altitude" operations. REF: C172N, 1978 POH,
page 4-11. Where it says to lean when operating in high altitudes
above 3000 MSL. Then in the flap operations paragraph it says that
it is OK to use 10 degrees of flaps for takeoff, but not during high
altitude operations, because the aircraft "may" not be able to
climb. Remember, the POH is written by lawyers, for lawyers, and
specifically states that one of the performance conditions is "at
maximum gross weight". So, since I was taught to always use 10
degrees of flaps for takeoff in the C172... I loaded her up to max
gross weight and tested this. They are right! I will NEVER use any
flaps for takeoff in a C172 (160hp or less) when above 3000' MSL or
density altitude.

Remember, that I (now) regularily operate 145hp, 150hp and 160hp
C172s for training from Leadville, CO (LXV, 9927 MSL, 6400' length)
and Glenwood Springs, CO (GWS, 5916 MSL, 3300' length). I am well
pre-disposed to fly by the POH!

Best regards,

Jer/ "Flight instruction/mountain flying are my vocation!" Eberhard

--
Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO
CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jeratfrii.com http://users.frii.com/jer/
C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor
CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot BM218 HAM N0FZD 235 Young Eagles!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Southern California airports have worst runway safety records Larry Dighera Piloting 0 November 26th 05 04:48 PM
Pilots Slick Piloting 4 November 20th 04 11:21 AM
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters John Cook Military Aviation 193 April 11th 04 03:33 AM
Rwy incursions Hankal Piloting 10 November 16th 03 02:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.