A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 12th 06, 03:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

Salutations All,

I've been reading on aircraft ownership lately, and had a few
questions.

In general, how do aircraft partnerships work? Do partnerships exist
for singles? Are they a good idea vs. purchasing a used aircraft
outright? What about flying clubs - do they typically offer good
multi-day rental rates or have aircraft available for scheduled use?

I'm trying to get my head around all this - I'm no where near joining a
partnership or purchasing an aircraft (gotta get my PP first), but I've
noticed some websites devoted to these topics and it's piqued my
interest. I'm looking for people who have first hand knowledge of these
topics.

Thanks for the help!

Regards,
Bryan Porter

  #2  
Old January 12th 06, 03:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

wrote:

In general, how do aircraft partnerships work? Do partnerships exist
for singles? Are they a good idea vs. purchasing a used aircraft
outright? What about flying clubs - do they typically offer good
multi-day rental rates or have aircraft available for scheduled use?


Simplistically, you can get a feel for it by understanding this:

1 = low 10= high

Operating costs (hourly and monthly)
==================
Owning: 10
Partnership: 7
Flying Club: 3


Aircraft Availability:
======================
Owning: 10
Partnership: 6
Flying Club: 3


Difficulty in reaching consensus in upgrading aircraft (avionics, interior,
etc):
=============================================
Owning: 2 (depending on wife)
Partnership: 6
Flying Club: 10


Politics:
=================
Owning: 1
Partnership: 5
Flying Club: 8

--
Peter
  #3  
Old January 12th 06, 08:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

Peter R. wrote:

Aircraft Availability:
======================
Owning: 10
Partnership: 6
Flying Club: 3


This isn't quite true, depending upon what you mean by "availability". One
of the major advantages of a multi-plane club (of any sort) is the ability
to keep flying even if a plane is "down".

I actually experienced this a week or so ago. For a silly reason, the plane
I was planning to take wasn't available. Another club plane *was*
available. A quick dialog with our scheduling system via my Treo
(schedulemaster.com, which is also available via phone), a walk a few steps
down the ramp, and off I went in "the other" airplane.

If I were an owner or partner of a lone plane, I'd have had to cancel the
flight.

- Andrew

  #4  
Old January 12th 06, 11:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

I started training by renting. Shortly after the first rate hike, I joined a
local flying club to finish. I still belong to the club (172 & 182). About
1/4 way into my IFR training, I partnered with a couple other guys in the
club & we bought a Cherokee 180C.

We hardly ever have a schedule conflict, and if we do, the club planes are
usually available. I've debated staying in the club. But, our 180 is in the
shop right now for some engine work. It's nice to have access to the club
planes. The dues are probably less than what renters insurance is (guess, i
haven't researched that).

I kinda like flying different planes from time to time. The club gives me
that. 70% of my flying is in my partnership plane.

For someone starting out, I would suggest a flying club. You can avoid some
of the hassles of owning (maintaining/fixing) & focus on learning. Now, if
you plan to fly/train 3+ times a week, you'll need a club with several
planes or very understanding members while you book the heck out of the
thing. :-D

"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com...
Peter R. wrote:

Aircraft Availability:
======================
Owning: 10
Partnership: 6
Flying Club: 3


This isn't quite true, depending upon what you mean by "availability".

One
of the major advantages of a multi-plane club (of any sort) is the ability
to keep flying even if a plane is "down".

I actually experienced this a week or so ago. For a silly reason, the

plane
I was planning to take wasn't available. Another club plane *was*
available. A quick dialog with our scheduling system via my Treo
(schedulemaster.com, which is also available via phone), a walk a few

steps
down the ramp, and off I went in "the other" airplane.

If I were an owner or partner of a lone plane, I'd have had to cancel the
flight.

- Andrew



  #5  
Old January 13th 06, 05:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

Andrew Gideon wrote:

If I were an owner or partner of a lone plane, I'd have had to cancel the
flight.


But then again, if you were a single owner or partner you wound probably
not cause some of the incidents that have landed a few of the local flying
club's aircraft in the shop.

For example, a pilot in the club or a passenger didn't hold onto the door
one windy day and it sprung open with such a force that it ripped a few of
the screws from its hinges and bent the door. Two weeks down.

Another time a flying club pilot buried the nose of the club's C172 into
the runway during a single moment of inattention while landing on a clear,
VFR day. Several months of down time to repair the bent firewall and
damaged nosewheel, and perform all tasks related to a propstrike.

Or how about the time a new flying club pilot back-taxied down a single
strip and decided to turn around on the grass adjacent to the asphalt,
sinking the nosewheel into a gopher's hole and causing a prop strike. At
least one month down time. Ok, so maybe the gopher's hole could happen to
anyone but if it were your bird, you might think twice before leaving
perfectly wide asphalt for the unknown of the moderate rough.



--
Peter
  #6  
Old January 13th 06, 08:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

"Peter R." wrote in message
...
Andrew Gideon wrote:

If I were an owner or partner of a lone plane, I'd have had to cancel the
flight.


But then again, if you were a single owner or partner you wound probably
not cause some of the incidents that have landed a few of the local flying
club's aircraft in the shop.

For example, a pilot in the club or a passenger didn't hold onto the door
one windy day and it sprung open with such a force that it ripped a few of
the screws from its hinges and bent the door. Two weeks down.

Another time a flying club pilot buried the nose of the club's C172 into
the runway during a single moment of inattention while landing on a clear,
VFR day. Several months of down time to repair the bent firewall and
damaged nosewheel, and perform all tasks related to a propstrike.

Or how about the time a new flying club pilot back-taxied down a single
strip and decided to turn around on the grass adjacent to the asphalt,
sinking the nosewheel into a gopher's hole and causing a prop strike. At
least one month down time. Ok, so maybe the gopher's hole could happen to
anyone but if it were your bird, you might think twice before leaving
perfectly wide asphalt for the unknown of the moderate rough.


Rediculous...

The above "stupid pilot tricks" are just at do-able by a single owner and/or
one member of a partnership.

In fact, the thought that 38 other pilots might want to tear me a new one if
I do something that downs a plane makes me more cautious and not less.

Jay Beckman
PP-ASEL
AZ Cloudbusters
Chandler, AZ


  #7  
Old January 13th 06, 01:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

Jay Beckman wrote:

Rediculous...


But true, Jay. Those anecdotes were not a figment of my imagination. All
of those examples actually happened to the local flying club at my airport
and all within the last three years.

My A&P is also the club's A&P, so every time I see one of the club's
aircraft in the maintenance hangar, I ask about him it.

The above "stupid pilot tricks" are just at do-able by a single owner
and/or one member of a partnership.


Perhaps.

--
Peter
  #8  
Old January 13th 06, 03:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

Peter R. wrote:
Andrew Gideon wrote:

If I were an owner or partner of a lone plane, I'd have had to cancel the
flight.


But then again, if you were a single owner or partner you wound probably
not cause some of the incidents that have landed a few of the local flying
club's aircraft in the shop.
[stupid club pilots tricks deleted]


I belong to a flying club with 3 virtually identical C172s for IFR
training and cross country flying, 3 virtually identical 152's for
primary training, and 2 Mooneys for advanced training and serious
cross-country flying. When our planes go into the shop it's seldom
because of stupid pilot tricks (though of course it has happened).
Usually it's avionics squawks, annuals, routine maint, or things just
breaking. Over the years I have experienced a vaccuum failure (luckily
in CAVU conditions) and an autopilot failure in club planes, neither of
which could be attributed to stupid pilot tricks. In both cases I
squawked it upon landing and flew other club planes until they were
fixed. My wallet didn't hurt at the cost, and I didn't stress over how
to schedule and pay for the repairs.

I would put stupid pilot tricks at less than 10% of the downtime of our
planes. In the remaining 90% of the cases, the problems would not have
been preventable by a single owner who never makes a mistake (heh), but
that single owner would still be out of luck, both finiancially and
schedule-wise, if it happened to his plane. In the club, you can
schedule another one ... if it's available. But if a plane is down,
the others will be scheduled so tightly that backup availability may be
more theoretical than actual. Our club's planes are pretty tightly
scheduled but they do work with people, for example, some local
training flights may get bumped if someone needs to take a checkride
and his scheduled plane is down, next priority is overnight trips which
may bump local flights if that happens, etc. Our manager is good at
working proactively to resolve these situations.

It's all a matter of a club's philosophy of availability vs. cost.
Tight availability means higher utilization and lower cost per hour for
members, and of course the reverse is also true.

Ideally one would own a plane and belong to a club for backup. Best of
both worlds, but not exactly economical Until I hit the lottery or
something like that, club is the way to go as far as I am concerned.

  #9  
Old January 13th 06, 05:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

I teach at a flying club and own my Mooney with a partner. The
difference with ownership is that you can often time maintenance items
so they do not interfere with planned trips. Although flying clubs say
they try to do this, it rarely works out that way. I can't think of a
single time I've had to cancel a trip in my Mooney due to mechanical
issues. However, I've had to cancel checkrides and cross countries with
students at the flying club for the same.
Also, no mater how much a flying club claims to have perfect
maintenance, a flying club plane just isn't maintained as well as an
owned plane. Its a mater of economics. It costs a damn **** load of
money to make the difference between ok and great maintenance. Members
of a flying club join because they think its cheaper than renting at an
FBO and expect it to be cheaper. Aircraft owners know that owning is
more expensive.
-Robert

  #10  
Old January 13th 06, 02:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Single-Engine Partnership vs. Used vs. Flying Clubs

Andrew Gideon wrote:

If I were an owner or partner of a lone plane, I'd have had to cancel the
flight.

- Andrew


Not really. As an owner I do a post flight inspection after each flight
and make sure any problems are taken care of right away. No one else
flies the airplane so you shouldn't have many surprises. Large tasks
such as annuals can be scheduled when you're not going anywhere for
a few days.

OW
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Gyrocopter Speed Mark Rotorcraft 36 August 16th 05 11:28 PM
100hr insp + non profit flying clubs DanH Owning 2 April 29th 04 11:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.