![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is my first post to this rec.aviation.piloting so forgive me if this
has been discussed before. A friend of mine who is IFR rated said there used to be a term called tower to tower to allow for an IFR clearance from one towered airport to another. This type of clearance wasn't as complicated as a full blown clearance. He thought that the name had been changed or that it was now called something else. I googled some but could not find any reference and not being IFR myself have no clue. Any comments are appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("keepitrunning" wrote)
A friend of mine who is IFR rated said there used to be a term called tower to tower to allow for an IFR clearance from one towered airport to another. This type of clearance wasn't as complicated as a full blown clearance. He thought that the name had been changed or that it was now called something else. I googled some but could not find any reference and not being IFR myself have no clue. Not IFR but how about ...Special VFR Clearance? When normal VFR flight wouldn't be advised, a tower can give you Special VFR Clearance to get over to another field, next door. That's how it was explained to me. Is this what you're thinking about? Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SVFR does not allow flight into IMC , just VFR as though the
Class B-E was G airspace. SVFR would interfere with IFR and is only allowed when there is no IFR traffic conflict. IFR clearances that stay within the airspace controlled by the tower [including TRACON] are available for such purposes as local IFR training and may be issued for enroute if the airspace letters of agreement between adjoining towers does not require Center airspace. To learn about your local IFR options, visit the tower and ask. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Montblack" wrote in message ... | ("keepitrunning" wrote) | A friend of mine who is IFR rated said there used to be a term called | tower to tower to allow for an IFR clearance from one towered airport to | another. This type of clearance wasn't as complicated as a full blown | clearance. He thought that the name had been changed or that it was now | called something else. I googled some but could not find any reference | and not being IFR myself have no clue. | | | Not IFR but how about ...Special VFR Clearance? | | When normal VFR flight wouldn't be advised, a tower can give you Special VFR | Clearance to get over to another field, next door. That's how it was | explained to me. | | Is this what you're thinking about? | | | Montblack | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:w8zNf.108917$QW2.10563@dukeread08... SVFR does not allow flight into IMC , just VFR as though the Class B-E was G airspace. SVFR would interfere with IFR and is only allowed when there is no IFR traffic conflict. SVFR operations are not prohibited when IFR aircraft are present. If the SVFR and IFR aircraft can be provided with approved separation and if arriving and departing IFR aircraft are not delayed then SVFR operations may be conducted. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
see the word "conflict" in the dictionary.
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:w8zNf.108917$QW2.10563@dukeread08... | | SVFR does not allow flight into IMC , just VFR as though the | Class B-E was G airspace. SVFR would interfere with IFR and | is only allowed when there is no IFR traffic conflict. | | | SVFR operations are not prohibited when IFR aircraft are present. If the | SVFR and IFR aircraft can be provided with approved separation and if | arriving and departing IFR aircraft are not delayed then SVFR operations may | be conducted. | | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:HOlPf.116146$QW2.52213@dukeread08... see the word "conflict" in the dictionary. You're welcome. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to the Pilot/Controller Glossary,
TOWER EN ROUTE CONTROL SERVICE - The control of IFR en route traffic within delegated airspace between two or more adjacent approach control facilities. This service is designed to expedite traffic and reduce control and pilot communication requirements. TOWER TO TOWER- (See TOWER EN ROUTE CONTROL SERVICE.) "keepitrunning" wrote in message . com... This is my first post to this rec.aviation.piloting so forgive me if this has been discussed before. A friend of mine who is IFR rated said there used to be a term called tower to tower to allow for an IFR clearance from one towered airport to another. This type of clearance wasn't as complicated as a full blown clearance. He thought that the name had been changed or that it was now called something else. I googled some but could not find any reference and not being IFR myself have no clue. Any comments are appreciated. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon Woellhaf" wrote in message . .. According to the Pilot/Controller Glossary, TOWER EN ROUTE CONTROL SERVICE - The control of IFR en route traffic within delegated airspace between two or more adjacent approach control facilities. This service is designed to expedite traffic and reduce control and pilot communication requirements. TOWER TO TOWER- (See TOWER EN ROUTE CONTROL SERVICE.) Also see AIM 4-1-18 /excerpt 4-1-18. Tower En Route Control (TEC) a. TEC is an ATC program to provide a service to aircraft proceeding to and from metropolitan areas. It links designated Approach Control Areas by a network of identified routes made up of the existing airway structure of the National Airspace System. The FAA initiated an expanded TEC program to include as many facilities as possible. The program’s intent is to provide an overflow resource in the low altitude system which would enhance ATC services. A few facilities have historically allowed turbojets to proceed between certain city pairs, such as Milwaukee and Chicago, via tower en route and these locations may continue this service. However, the expanded TEC program will be applied, generally, for nonturbojet aircraft operating at and below 10,000 feet. The program is entirely within the approach control airspace of multiple terminal facilities. Essentially, it is for relatively short flights. Participating pilots are encouraged to use TEC for flights of two hours duration or less. If longer flights are planned, extensive coordination may be required within the multiple complex which could result in unanticipated delays. b. Pilots requesting TEC are subject to the same delay factor at the destination airport as other aircraft in the ATC system. In addition, departure and en route delays may occur depending upon individual facility workload. When a major metropolitan airport is incurring significant delays, pilots in the TEC program may want to consider an alternative airport experiencing no delay. c. There are no unique requirements upon pilots to use the TEC program. Normal flight plan filing procedures will ensure proper flight plan processing. Pilots should include the acronym “TEC” in the remarks section of the flight plan when requesting tower en route control. d. All approach controls in the system may not operate up to the maximum TEC altitude of 10,000 feet. IFR flight may be planned to any satellite airport in proximity to the major primary airport via the same routing. /end -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We still have it. Its a prearranged agreement between local airports
how they will route IFR traffic. The cool part for a pilot is you don't need to prefile an IFR flight plan. When you call ground you just ask for a "tower enroute" to your destination. Works great for local IFR trips. -Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone know if this is avaliable in the Phoenix area?
--Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Los Angeles radio tower crash kills 2 | Paul Hirose | Piloting | 178 | August 6th 05 03:46 PM |
some funny (but scary) stuff... | Mike W. | Piloting | 18 | February 4th 05 09:55 AM |
Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
Tower with only Class G Airspace | Jeff Saylor | Piloting | 8 | May 10th 04 09:53 PM |
New Oshkosh Tower | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 03 05:35 PM |