![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi there
I am a '78 Grumman Tiger owner here who is toying with trading up to a Mooney. Not sure which one, perhaps a 201 for starters or maybe a 231. My question to the group is "have you ever flown or own a Mooney?" What are your thoughts about its reputation for being a "cozy" fit and its performance? What year model was it and what was the cost of insurance? Any insight into these speed demons greatly appreciated. Thanks, Lou |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Search r.a.o via google groups for Jon Kraus. You should find a ton of
good stuff to read from his purchase experience -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL-Instrument Airplane Arrow N2104T "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return" - Leonardo Da Vinci (Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I own a Mooney and love it. A couple things I would note...
1) The Mooney is not for short pilots. I'm 6'4" and cannot use the rear couple sit positions. A friend of mine is 5'10" and has very limited in flight visibility over the glareshield and must fly with the seat all the way forward. You can get rudder extensions and cushions but as is, its for tall pilots. 2) The Mooney baggage door is awesome if you like to load em high. I travel with my wife and kids and there have been times when the taxi driver had trouble loading all the luggage in the taxi, but we can always get it in the Mooney. When I had the Debonair I had to load the first few bags through the little side door and the rest over the top of the back seat. With the Mooney you load it from the top and you can easily load it all the way to the top. For guys that only bring one or two bags, its probably more work but for those of us that need to stack em high, it works great. 3) It has great range. When you go down to southern Baja you'll find that over half the planes down there are Mooneys. Most Mooneys come stock with about 6.5 hours of fuel till the engine quits. I added the fuel computer to better manager and I've flown close to 8 hours w/o being able to find gas. 4) Good high/low performance. I've landed one some pretty small strips in Mexico and can come in pretty slow, but I can also keep up with the 737's on final if necessary. 5) Simple gear. I have the electric gear but even that is probably the simpilest gear system you'll find out there. We always had trouble with leaks in the Arrow. In the Mooney its just one motor and one transmission that works all 3 gear at once. 6) Not hard to fly. I've tought people to fly Mooneys that haven't flown in decads and have even trained student pilots to fly the Mooney. If you can control your airspeed you probably won't find the Mooney to be difficult to fly at all. 7) Because it sits low, getting in and out is more difficult. In a Bonanza you sit up, like in a truck, in the Mooney you sit low, like in a sports car with your legs in front of you. It is more difficult to get in/out of than a C182 but you're going faster on less gas. If you want to carry people in the back, the models F and beyond have an extra 10' in the back (just like the Arrow did in 71). I've sat in the back seat with another full size male before and its doable. No more tight than the 182. 8) The best part may be the bullet proof IO-360 motor. Its only 200 hp but it probably the most reliable engine ever made. I don't have to replace cylinders every 1000 hours as the C182's and Bonanzas tend to lean towards. Anyway, not to be a sales person but I enjoy my Mooney. -Robert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've flown a Mooney once, a M20K if I remember correctly... it's been a
while. Damn thing would climb like a banshee and wouldn't want to come down, except for the cool speed brakes (Precise Flight?). I could not get used to the tight confines of its cabin, though. I prefer a little more shoulder room. When we returned to home field the right tire blew (had a bald spot and the owner had forgotten to change the tire), but with plenty of left rudder and some careful braking and I was able to keep it on the runway. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to work for a Mooney dealer, and got to fly the M20J & K. I liked
them both. I'm 6'2", 190, and fit comfortably. Strong point: Speed & Miles per gallon. They are fun to fly, and I have had both in and out of small strips(1500'), off of grass & dirt. Climbs well, cross country is a blast, and descent just requires a little planning. Start down early with a slow descent, trade altitude for extra speed with the same fuel burn. The added speed in the early part of the descent, will "pre-cool" the engine so that later power reductions can be done without "shocking" the engine. Although the circumstances were a little unusual, I've flown a 231 literally "cross country", non-stop, SFO - DCA in 8hrs. Al "Juan Jimenez" wrote in message m... I've flown a Mooney once, a M20K if I remember correctly... it's been a while. Damn thing would climb like a banshee and wouldn't want to come down, except for the cool speed brakes (Precise Flight?). I could not get used to the tight confines of its cabin, though. I prefer a little more shoulder room. When we returned to home field the right tire blew (had a bald spot and the owner had forgotten to change the tire), but with plenty of left rudder and some careful braking and I was able to keep it on the runway. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Hi there I am a '78 Grumman Tiger owner here who is toying with trading up to a Mooney. Not sure which one, perhaps a 201 for starters or maybe a 231. My question to the group is "have you ever flown or own a Mooney?" What are your thoughts about its reputation for being a "cozy" fit and its performance? What year model was it and what was the cost of insurance? Any insight into these speed demons greatly appreciated. Thanks, Lou It's been almost 20 years since I owned a Mooney. I put about 300-400 hours on it and then we sold it for a twin. Here's what I remember. Small cabin. Big guys over 200 lbs are going to be shoulder to shoulder. Great flying plane. I remember loving to fly this plane. It was fun. It did what you want and didn't complain. It was fast enough at the time and I think they've even made them faster. Didn't drink alot of gas. Didn't want to slow down during the descents. I commonly found myself fast on final because I started down late. It was just a blast to fly. It sits pretty low to the ground, so I never took it to a grass strip, but for everything else, you could put it down where you wanted it. If I needed another small 4 seater, I'd look at them again. I think of them like a fast little porshe. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I flew an early M20 with the Johnson bar gear - 10+ hours for my
commercial. Tight? My Maule MX7 is tighter but easier to mount, dismount and load. The plane is optimized towards cross country performance. Nice wing for cruising but you are definitely aware when it is in the 'laminar mode'. Not particularly fun to take off and climb out on an aged 200hp lycoming. Once it gets up on the step, it performs. Same on landing except once you get it slowed down past a certain point, you can do some really nice obstructed short field stuff. I can more easily land short over a 50ft obstacle than my Maule! (Easier, not shorter). Hard to say it's fun to manuever but it's a satisfying cruiser. Point A to B efficiently. I'm sure it does fine on turf but not it's favorite place. God, I'd love to have one but I'm on turf and I like to go in all conditions. So I'm flying it's complete opposite and loving it too. So it takes me 20 mins longer. wrote: Hi there I am a '78 Grumman Tiger owner here who is toying with trading up to a Mooney. Not sure which one, perhaps a 201 for starters or maybe a 231. My question to the group is "have you ever flown or own a Mooney?" What are your thoughts about its reputation for being a "cozy" fit and its performance? What year model was it and what was the cost of insurance? Any insight into these speed demons greatly appreciated. Thanks, Lou |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mooney is a great airplane.
The laminar flow wing likes to go fast and not slow down. Too many pilots land the Mooney too fast because they do not plan their approach. There is a company at the San Antonio airport that installs speed brakes in the wing. These things are great! You can leave your power in and desend without shock cooling the engine. They will help you get slowed down to a good approach speed. I was doing some hood work with a doctor in their 231 Mooney, practicing unusual attitude recovery. He had not flown the 231 since the speed brakes were installed. The 231 was in getting into the yellow arc and he had not yet recovered. I told him to push the red button and he would gain a few more seconds before he was in real trouble. He pushed the button and the brakes deployed. This gave him time to correct his situation. I am 6'4" and weigh 225 lbs. I have no problem fitting in the or getting out of a Mooney. The person sitting in the rear seat is not a problem as long as they are in a child seat or had their legs amputated. The rear seat of a Mooney is like any sports car. The down part of a Mooney has to do with line boys and tugs. Mooney has a serious turning limit on the nose wheel. ALWAYS check the nose gear carefully during preflight. Going past the limits can cause damage to this structure. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Clay" wrote in message ups.com... Mooney is a great airplane. The laminar flow wing likes to go fast and not slow down. Too many pilots land the Mooney too fast because they do not plan their approach. There is a company at the San Antonio airport that installs speed brakes in the wing. These things are great! You can leave your power in and desend without shock cooling the engine. Not that speed brakes aren't useful, but: http://www.avweb.com/news/maint/182883-1.html (Reprint from Kas Thomas' TBO Advisor) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing a Mooney | Jon Kraus | Piloting | 42 | November 9th 04 07:53 PM |
Landing a Mooney | iain_hutchison | Piloting | 0 | November 4th 04 02:38 PM |
Mooney M20 K on Grass ? | Andrew Boyd | Owning | 0 | August 13th 04 03:00 PM |
Loading luggage in other than Mooney | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 21 | June 28th 04 06:23 PM |
Cirrus vs Mooney | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 6 | July 8th 03 11:35 PM |