![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How often do you spot traffic without guidance from ATC when you are out
flying" How often do you spot traffic called out to you by ATC? On a recent trip, while flying a PA32-300, I never saw traffic that ATC called out to me that passed within two miles and 1000 feet vertical separation. This was a flight of two T-38's. On my last trip in a C182S with Garmin330 transponder and MX-20 display, I watch as the display showed traffic passing 1500 feet directly overhead, but never was able to eyeball the traffic. Earlier in the flight, I did locate an aircraft 700 feet below and inside a mile. All of the above occurred during daylight, clear VFR. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T38's are small and hard to see. Clear skies are harder
because there is no background, just bright sky. Remember, ATC calls traffic in relation to your track, not heading, so if they say 2 O'clock it can be anywhere to your right front. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "john smith" wrote in message ... | How often do you spot traffic without guidance from ATC when you are out | flying" | | How often do you spot traffic called out to you by ATC? | | On a recent trip, while flying a PA32-300, I never saw traffic that ATC | called out to me that passed within two miles and 1000 feet vertical | separation. This was a flight of two T-38's. | | On my last trip in a C182S with Garmin330 transponder and MX-20 display, | I watch as the display showed traffic passing 1500 feet directly | overhead, but never was able to eyeball the traffic. Earlier in the | flight, I did locate an aircraft 700 feet below and inside a mile. | | All of the above occurred during daylight, clear VFR. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
john smith wrote: How often do you spot traffic without guidance from ATC when you are out flying? Fairly often, but I don't know how many I missed, obviously. I've had three near collisions, all away from airports, and two requiring evasive action. I've had close calls in the pattern when position reports where horribly wrong, but all of those were resolved before they got too close for comfort. The first near collision was at 10,500ft. A bizjet crossed 90degrees to my path so fast that I didn't have time to react. Range was less then half a mile. I don't think the bizjet crew even saw me. The second was at 6,500ft. A Bonanza was off the left side, 90degrees to my path, and wasn't moving in the window. I turned a few degrees to the left to get off the collision course, and passed behind the Bo. We got a little bump from the Bonanza's wake turbulence. The third was down low, heading eastbound through the pass between Half Moon Bay and Crystal Springs under the SFO Class B. A Bonanza was heading westbound on a reciprocal heading at my altitude. With a closing speed of ~250kts, the Bonanza 'appeared' out of nowhere. I had to yank hard to avoid the collision. How often do you spot traffic called out to you by ATC? For traffic at 5miles, I spot the traffic ~50% of the time. Alot of times, I get 'traffic no factor' before I can find it. Small stuff like us is hard to spot, unfortunately. All of the above occurred during daylight, clear VFR. Ditto. See and avoid works pretty well in the pattern, where the close traffic (1/2mile away) is moving in basically the same direction as you. Unless someone is flying the opposite pattern or doing other unfriendly behaviors, the closing rate should be low enough to see the traffic. And yes, I know most midairs happen at airports, but I think that is more a factor of the fact that airports attract lots of airplanes. Away from an airport, traffic can be moving in any random direction. Head on, even two spam cans can have a frighteningly high closing speed. In my head on encounter with the Bonanza, I was a second away from a fireball. John -- John Clear - http://www.clear-prop.org/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Less than half the time. Even with a callout it is not easy.
Bob Gardner "john smith" wrote in message ... How often do you spot traffic without guidance from ATC when you are out flying" How often do you spot traffic called out to you by ATC? On a recent trip, while flying a PA32-300, I never saw traffic that ATC called out to me that passed within two miles and 1000 feet vertical separation. This was a flight of two T-38's. On my last trip in a C182S with Garmin330 transponder and MX-20 display, I watch as the display showed traffic passing 1500 feet directly overhead, but never was able to eyeball the traffic. Earlier in the flight, I did locate an aircraft 700 feet below and inside a mile. All of the above occurred during daylight, clear VFR. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"john smith" wrote in message ...
How often do you spot traffic without guidance from ATC when you are out flying" A few years back, before the New Smyrna Beach Airport (KEVB) had a control tower we made all our call outs on the CTAF and while on short final we noticed something odd. The image before us was hard to make out but as we got closer to the runway we realized that it was a twin on takeoff from runway 20. The problem with that was the fact that we were on the reciprocal end landing on runway 02. The twin was hard to make out because of how low he was to the trees after he had done a downwind takeoff without making any calls to anyone (yes we were on the correct frequency, we could here everyone else make their calls). The wind that day was 030 @ 11kts. so that made runway of choice was 02. That head-on collision was avoided by adding full power and banking hard right. But that isn't the end of this story. We were there to test fly a plane that I was interested in buying. The owner took us up in the pattern to demonstrate the plane to us but the first problem was that he also tried to take off from the wrong runway and was yelled at by everyone on the frequency. Since then the New Smyrna Beach Airport (KEVB) now has a working control tower. David. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "FLAV8R" wrote in message ... A few years back, before the New Smyrna Beach Airport (KEVB) had a control tower we made all our call outs on the CTAF and while on short final we noticed something odd. The image before us was hard to make out but as we got closer to the runway we realized that it was a twin on takeoff from runway 20. The problem with that was the fact that we were on the reciprocal end landing on runway 02. The reciprocal end of runway 20 is not runway 02, it's runway 2. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 May 2006 01:22:53 GMT, john smith wrote in
:: I never saw traffic that ATC called out to me that passed within two miles and 1000 feet vertical separation. I agree. It's difficult to spot conflicting air traffic even when it's only a mile or two away. No doubt, that's the reasoning behind the FAA's 250 knot speed limit below 10,000'. As Mr. Macklin indicates: Remember, ATC calls traffic in relation to your track, not heading, so if they say 2 O'clock it can be anywhere to your right front. There is another insidious inaccuracy in ATC's traffic advisory information. Termed 'latency' it is caused by the radar antenna's rotation rate. Targets are updated on the 'scope' once every six seconds, so the baring provided by ATC is not real-time, but historical by up to six seconds. (This rate may vary by facility.) If one assumes a worst case scenario of 250 knot traffic, six seconds works out to 4,167'/second, or 25,000' (greater than 4 nautical miles). Additionally, radar information is remotely relayed to TRACONs, and then processed by ATC computers. Surely this induces additional latency, but I have no information on the magnitude of its significance. So, with all this in mind, it helps to look along the flight path of the traffic (corrected for wind) up to 4 NM out ahead of where ATC reported it. If you still don't spot the traffic, request a vector from ATC. And what ever you do, NEVER rely on ATC to keep you separated in VMC; separation in VMC is ALWAYS airmens' responsibility even if you're on an IFR flight plan. As a wise, old airman once opined: For instance, a pilot who has no fear of a mid-air is an idiot. A pilot who flies without being constantly aware that he/she is the main aspect of the mid-air avoidance equation is misguided. --Dudley Henriques |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If one assumes a worst case scenario of 250 knot traffic, six seconds
works out to 4,167'/second, or 25,000' (greater than 4 nautical miles). This sounds like orbital speed. 250 knots is 250 (nautical) miles per HOUR, about 250*6000 feet per hour, or about 250*100 feet per minute. 25000 feet every sixty seconds, or 2500 feet every six seconds. Half a mile in six seconds. Opposite direction traffic at the same speed and your relative change is a mile in six seconds. Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 May 2006 16:10:37 GMT, Jose
wrote in :: If one assumes a worst case scenario of 250 knot traffic, six seconds works out to 4,167'/second, or 25,000' (greater than 4 nautical miles). This sounds like orbital speed. 250 knots is 250 (nautical) miles per HOUR, about 250*6000 feet per hour, or about 250*100 feet per minute. 25000 feet every sixty seconds, or 2500 feet every six seconds. Half a mile in six seconds. Opposite direction traffic at the same speed and your relative change is a mile in six seconds. Jose Damn decimal places.... :-) I appreciate the correction. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Larry Dighera said:
If one assumes a worst case scenario of 250 knot traffic, six seconds works out to 4,167'/second, or 25,000' (greater than 4 nautical miles). This sounds like orbital speed. 250 knots is 250 (nautical) miles per HOUR, about 250*6000 feet per hour, or about 250*100 feet per minute. 25000 feet every sixty seconds, or 2500 feet every six seconds. Half a mile in six seconds. Opposite direction traffic at the same speed and your relative change is a mile in six seconds. Jose Damn decimal places.... :-) You non-Unix/non-Mac users don't know what you're missing: [tomblin@chicago ~]$ units 2084 units, 71 prefixes, 32 nonlinear units You have: 250 knots You want: feet per 6 seconds * 2531.7148 / 0.0003949892 You have: ^D [tomblin@chicago ~]$ 250 knots is 2531.7 feet in 6 seconds. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "You must be smarter than this stick ---- to put a machine on the Internet." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |