![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Bay Area is plagued by small plane noise. I can't go outside
without hearing the droneing sound. From afar, it is like some sort of low frequency noise, as the plane gets closer, it is very irritating. The FAA should regulate the noise levels of these planes before they become a real nusance, and private aircraft will be completly banned. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pilots are already regulated by the FAA. See 91.303 for acrobatic
operation, and other sections that set altitude minimums. There are also areas where flight is restricted. So you might try to get the altitudes raised or a restricted zone put around your house. Lots of luck. daffy wrote: The Bay Area is plagued by small plane noise. I can't go outside without hearing the droneing sound. From afar, it is like some sort of low frequency noise, as the plane gets closer, it is very irritating. The FAA should regulate the noise levels of these planes before they become a real nusance, and private aircraft will be completly banned. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are noise abatement regulations in effect right now where they are
warranted. Motorcycles make more noise than prop airplanes, and they are far more numerous and travel much nearer to people on the ground. Bob Gardner "daffy" wrote in message oups.com... The Bay Area is plagued by small plane noise. I can't go outside without hearing the droneing sound. From afar, it is like some sort of low frequency noise, as the plane gets closer, it is very irritating. The FAA should regulate the noise levels of these planes before they become a real nusance, and private aircraft will be completly banned. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did this person post the same message a few months ago?
personally, I consider this trolling. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
by "Bob Gardner" Aug 10, 2006 at 01:50 PM
There are noise abatement regulations in effect right now where they are warranted. Motorcycles make more noise than prop airplanes, and they are far more numerous and travel much nearer to people on the ground. Bob Gardner Daffy: Don't be deterred by the same bs, canned, nonsense. Noise statutes exist in most communities, except for small planes. For GA, there is no enforcement whatsoever. Go to the press, the politicians, and ORGANIZE other victims. Get the pilots to be socially responsible, since they don't care and think (incorrectly) that the FAA (unenforced) regs protect them. Check state and local statutes. You may be able to file a nuisance suit. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Isn't this how Skylune started?
"daffy" wrote in message oups.com... The Bay Area is plagued by small plane noise. I can't go outside without hearing the droneing sound. From afar, it is like some sort of low frequency noise, as the plane gets closer, it is very irritating. The FAA should regulate the noise levels of these planes before they become a real nusance, and private aircraft will be completly banned. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Noise is only one of the issues that i have with the current state of GA.
But, times they are a changin... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Aug 2006 13:28:39 -0700, "daffy"
wrote in .com: The Bay Area is plagued by small plane noise. Here's the answer you got to the same question last January: From: Don Tuite Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Subject: Planes drone out MLK celebration Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:51:33 GMT On 17 Jan 2006 10:18:20 -0800, "daffy" wrote: First, the city we are talking about is Newark, not Norwalk. Second, the small plane (GA) traffic is NON-STOP, where a new plane passes overhead every 60 seconds or so everyday, so this plane noise was not done delibertly during the ML King celebration. It was hard to hear the speaker while planes flew above the event. Yes, the noise lasts only 20 seconds, and if only a few planes per hour were out, it wouldn't be an issue, but the airspace above Newark is a pilots fancy. This complaint makes sense. Planes heading for San Carlos, Palo Alto, Reid Hillview, Hayward, and to some extent, Oakland tend to exit the Livermore valley via the Sunol gap. The gravel ponds at Niles are sort of a waypoint, and Lake Elizabeth marks a step transition in the base of the San Francisco class B, so it's another airplane magnet. Going west or north, the reporting point for San Carlos is the Coyote Hills, which is a little north of the Dumbarton Bridge tollboth. Inbound Palo Alto pilots report the Nummi plant or the salt pile, a little to the south. I'm not sure where the Hayward reporting point is from the south, but it's got to be right around there. A little further south and you're in San Jose's airspace. That actually protects Milpitas because flying east of 680 puts you out of San Jose airspace. The result is that Newark and Fremont take it in the shorts. I don't have a solution, but the poster is by no means talking through his hat. Well, I do know one thing that makes logistical sense. Move Palo Alto GA and San Jose freight to Moffet. Don |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought it was time to complain again.
Larry Dighera wrote: On 10 Aug 2006 13:28:39 -0700, "daffy" wrote in .com: The Bay Area is plagued by small plane noise. Here's the answer you got to the same question last January: From: Don Tuite Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Subject: Planes drone out MLK celebration Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:51:33 GMT On 17 Jan 2006 10:18:20 -0800, "daffy" wrote: First, the city we are talking about is Newark, not Norwalk. Second, the small plane (GA) traffic is NON-STOP, where a new plane passes overhead every 60 seconds or so everyday, so this plane noise was not done delibertly during the ML King celebration. It was hard to hear the speaker while planes flew above the event. Yes, the noise lasts only 20 seconds, and if only a few planes per hour were out, it wouldn't be an issue, but the airspace above Newark is a pilots fancy. This complaint makes sense. Planes heading for San Carlos, Palo Alto, Reid Hillview, Hayward, and to some extent, Oakland tend to exit the Livermore valley via the Sunol gap. The gravel ponds at Niles are sort of a waypoint, and Lake Elizabeth marks a step transition in the base of the San Francisco class B, so it's another airplane magnet. Going west or north, the reporting point for San Carlos is the Coyote Hills, which is a little north of the Dumbarton Bridge tollboth. Inbound Palo Alto pilots report the Nummi plant or the salt pile, a little to the south. I'm not sure where the Hayward reporting point is from the south, but it's got to be right around there. A little further south and you're in San Jose's airspace. That actually protects Milpitas because flying east of 680 puts you out of San Jose airspace. The result is that Newark and Fremont take it in the shorts. I don't have a solution, but the poster is by no means talking through his hat. Well, I do know one thing that makes logistical sense. Move Palo Alto GA and San Jose freight to Moffet. Don |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please, go to your nearest small airport and get to know some people
there, pilots and people in the various businesses supporting general aviation. Learn from them about what they do and why, and about their attitudes towards you and about what they do. Then tell us what you learned. TIA for being truly interested in subjects you wish to discuss. george |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Can a Plane on a Treadmill Take Off? | cjcampbell | Piloting | 286 | February 17th 06 10:02 PM |
Cirrus chute deployment -- an incredible story | Michael182/G | Instrument Flight Rules | 48 | July 14th 05 03:52 PM |
My first lesson | Marco Rispoli | Aerobatics | 3 | May 17th 05 08:23 AM |