![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All I have to say about user fees is that if they are implemented and
I am going to be nickeled and dimed to death by a bureaucratic nightmare that adds overhead and significantly more per hour cost to an already expensive per hour rate for flying time, I am going to hang up my wings... Just imagine what the per pilot cost of the FAA will be when about 200,000 pilots are driven out of the system by user fees. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... All I have to say about user fees is that if they are implemented and I am going to be nickeled and dimed to death by a bureaucratic nightmare that adds overhead and significantly more per hour cost to an already expensive per hour rate for flying time, I am going to hang up my wings... Just imagine what the per pilot cost of the FAA will be when about 200,000 pilots are driven out of the system by user fees. It all depends on what they call a user. If they consider 'ATC contact' to be 'use', then it won't cost me any more. I rarely contact ATC, and when I do, it's optional. I won't call for flight following, and I'll avoid airports with towers. By the time I get near class C airspace, I'm usually high enough to go over. The local class B normally tells me to remain clear, so I won't bother them either. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 9:56 am, "Steve Foley" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... All I have to say about user fees is that if they are implemented and I am going to be nickeled and dimed to death by a bureaucratic nightmare that adds overhead and significantly more per hour cost to an already expensive per hour rate for flying time, I am going to hang up my wings... Just imagine what the per pilot cost of the FAA will be when about 200,000 pilots are driven out of the system by user fees. It all depends on what they call a user. If they consider 'ATC contact' to be 'use', then it won't cost me any more. I rarely contact ATC, and when I do, it's optional. I won't call for flight following, and I'll avoid airports with towers. By the time I get near class C airspace, I'm usually high enough to go over. The local class B normally tells me to remain clear, so I won't bother them either. That's fine for you, but my club is based at a towered airport in the center of a class C... Can you say u$er fee$? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve Foley" wrote:
It all depends on what they call a user. Anyone who fuels their aircraft with avgas or mogas may see a four-fold increase in fuel tax: "a nearly four-fold increase in the fuel tax paid by general aviation operators (avgas and autogas)" From: http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?C...3-d6e3d27524b1 Wait - you say you fly between non-towered private-use airfields and generally don't use ATC when you do? Tough. You have no idea how expensive it is for the federal government to maintain the atmosphere! You think it just grows on trees!? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote:
You have no idea how expensive it is for the federal government to maintain the atmosphere! You think it just grows on trees!? Didn't Algore invent the atmosphere? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ktbr" wrote in message ... Jim Logajan wrote: You have no idea how expensive it is for the federal government to maintain the atmosphere! You think it just grows on trees!? Didn't Algore invent the atmosphere? ....and the Democrats taxed it. -------------------------------------- DW |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-02-09, Jim Logajan wrote:
generally don't use ATC when you do? Tough. You have no idea how expensive it is for the federal government to maintain the atmosphere! You think it just grows on trees!? On a point of pedantry, some of the atmosphere does grow on trees :-)§ -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Foley wrote:
I won't call for flight following, and I'll avoid airports with towers. I wonder what it'll be like for ATC if all of the VFR aircraft that currently use flight following become 1200 blips on the radar? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, B A R R Y posted:
Steve Foley wrote: I won't call for flight following, and I'll avoid airports with towers. I wonder what it'll be like for ATC if all of the VFR aircraft that currently use flight following become 1200 blips on the radar? I imagine that any difficulties that might cause would be shortly followed by a mandate to use flight following in most areas. Neil |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Gould wrote:
I imagine that any difficulties that might cause would be shortly followed by a mandate to use flight following in most areas. Followed by a bunch of blips with no transponder return? G |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS User Fees Loom Larger! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | December 19th 06 11:33 PM |
Trouble ahead over small plane fees | AJ | Piloting | 90 | April 15th 06 01:19 PM |
What will user fees do to small towered airports | Steve Foley | Piloting | 10 | March 8th 06 03:13 PM |
GA User fees | Jose | Piloting | 48 | December 24th 05 02:12 AM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |